H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Slava Dosedel vs Gianluca Pozzi H2H: 1-0

Slava Dosedel holds a 1–0 lead over Gianluca Pozzi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Slava Dosedel leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Slava Dosedel won the 1992 Bologna round of 32 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Slava Dosedel
CZE Age 56 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Gianluca Pozzi
ITA Age 61 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Slava Dosedel #283 7-5 6-3 Gianluca Pozzi #54 Match data May 21, 1992* R32 Bologna ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Slava Dosedel #1,027 #26 1,122 1,826 190 185 50.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Gianluca Pozzi #1,466 #40 864 1,783 173 258 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Slava Dosedel Gianluca Pozzi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1989 0–2 0.0% #265 1,468 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1990 1–3 25.0% #146 1,467 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1991 4–13 23.5% #201 1,444 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1992 3–3 50.0% #159 1,497 0 0 1986 0–2 0.0% #277 1,480 0 0
22 1993 16–15 51.6% #68 1,608 0 0 1987 1–2 33.3% #153 1,501 0 0
23 1994 36–23 61.0% #29 1,733 0 0 1988 4–8 33.3% #165 1,507 0 0
24 1995 27–25 51.9% #60 1,696 0 1 1989 7–11 38.9% #179 1,531 0 0
25 1996 21–13 61.8% #66 1,768 0 2 1990 1–8 11.1% #185 1,459 0 0
26 1997 24–18 57.1% #43 1,763 0 3 1991 16–13 55.2% #76 1,696 0 1
27 1998 21–21 50.0% #64 1,690 0 3 1992 28–28 50.0% #68 1,708 0 1
28 1999 15–12 55.6% #63 1,740 0 3 1993 13–26 33.3% #107 1,560 0 1
29 2000 17–21 44.7% #64 1,704 0 3 1994 11–18 37.9% #93 1,608 0 1
30 2001 5–16 23.8% #152 1,568 0 3 1995 10–22 31.2% #138 1,555 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 1996 7–14 33.3% #107 1,531 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 1997 3–7 30.0% #101 1,508 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 1998 22–27 44.9% #61 1,653 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 1999 16–26 38.1% #94 1,602 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 2000 27–23 54.0% #43 1,724 0 1
36 — — — — — — — 2001 7–23 23.3% #155 1,494 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Slava Dosedel Gianluca Pozzi
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1989 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1991 2 6 8 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1993 2 2 4 50.0% 14 12 26 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1987 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1994 — — — — 35 20 55 63.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1988 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1995 — — — — 21 18 39 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1989 7 10 17 41.2% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 1996 1 1 2 50.0% 20 11 31 64.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 1997 8 8 16 50.0% 16 7 23 69.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 11 8 19 57.9% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
27 1998 5 8 13 38.5% 15 11 26 57.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1992 17 18 35 48.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
28 1999 8 6 14 57.1% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1993 8 15 23 34.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
29 2000 11 12 23 47.8% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1994 7 11 18 38.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
30 2001 1 7 8 12.5% 3 7 10 30.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 3 11 14 21.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 12 13 25 48.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 5 9 44.4%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 11 14 25 44.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 12 14 26 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 6 12 18 33.3% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career — 38 51 89 42.7% 141 110 251 56.2% 5 10 15 33.3% 6 14 20 30.0% — 105 149 254 41.3% 6 34 40 15.0% 32 36 68 47.1% 30 39 69 43.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Slava Dosedel Gianluca Pozzi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1989 1469 96.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–2 — — +0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 1467 113.7 — — — — — +37 — 33.3% -0.89 0–1 1–0 — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1991 1445 114.9 -2.50 -2.28 0.827 46.2% +54 +61 — 31.1% -0.98 2–4 (33%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1992 1497 106.4 -0.76 -0.97 0.911 48.6% — +42 — 33.3% -1.42 1–0 0–1 — -0.15 1986 1480 97.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — +0.06
22 1993 1608 124.0 -3.61 +2.59 0.988 49.7% -110 +72 — 52.8% +0.04 3–2 (60%) 3–2 (60%) — +2.06 1987 1501 105.9 — — — — — — — 37.5% -1.25 — — — -0.04
23 1994 1734 143.4 -1.39 +4.58 1.062 51.3% — +97 — 56.7% +0.38 13–5 (72%) 8–7 (53%) — +0.20 1988 1508 113.8 — — — — +65 — — 33.3% -1.00 1–3 (25%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.72
24 1995 1697 126.8 -1.34 +1.49 1.022 50.5% -185 +56 — 52.0% +0.22 7–9 (44%) 8–5 (62%) — +2.45 1989 1532 111.7 — — — — +42 — — 41.7% -0.56 3–4 (43%) 2–2 (50%) — +1.01
25 1996 1769 147.2 -0.26 +4.43 1.131 52.5% -253 +59 — 61.8% +0.87 4–5 (44%) 5–9 (36%) — -1.58 1990 1460 99.5 — — — — +55 — — 22.7% -2.14 0–2 3–0 (100%) — +0.74
26 1997 1763 139.2 -0.53 +2.85 1.080 51.3% -158 +141 — 51.8% +0.17 11–6 (65%) 13–6 (68%) — -0.78 1991 1697 135.0 — — — — +11 — -143 52.8% +0.04 6–6 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.02
27 1998 1690 137.3 -1.23 +2.78 1.030 50.6% -78 +130 -150 47.5% -0.19 5–6 (45%) 10–11 (48%) — -1.69 1992 1709 135.4 — — — — +34 -217 -129 46.6% -0.12 17–7 (71%) 6–10 (38%) — +0.05
28 1999 1741 128.9 +0.19 +2.72 1.065 50.9% -31 +30 — 59.5% +0.30 2–7 (22%) 7–4 (64%) — +1.11 1993 1560 119.9 — — — — +30 — +12 35.1% -1.37 7–7 (50%) 11–4 (73%) — -1.02
29 2000 1705 136.5 -0.65 +3.11 1.046 50.6% -5 +2 — 49.0% +0.08 2–8 (20%) 6–6 (50%) — -1.55 1994 1608 117.5 — — — — +43 — -94 40.5% -0.71 6–6 (50%) 5–6 (45%) — +1.46
30 2001 1569 123.5 -4.55 -0.10 0.823 46.3% +38 +58 — 29.8% -1.35 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) — -0.94 1995 1555 119.8 — — — — +23 — +2 35.1% -1.13 1–4 (20%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.52
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1531 114.7 — — — — +18 — +61 37.3% -0.82 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.29
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1509 109.9 — — — — +20 — — 31.8% -1.36 1–1 2–0 — +0.87
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1654 134.1 — — — — +15 -252 -36 46.2% -0.16 6–6 (50%) 8–9 (47%) — +0.09
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1602 130.9 — — — — +37 -205 +16 41.8% -0.45 6–11 (35%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.01
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1725 134.1 — — — — -41 -313 +22 50.8% +0.11 12–8 (60%) 12–5 (71%) — -1.12
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1494 121.1 — — — — +82 -133 +119 28.8% -1.23 1–7 (13%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.16
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1486 101.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1826 140.0 -1.41 +2.62 1.023 50.4% -61 +78 -150 50.4% +0.02 52–58 (47%) 64–60 (52%) 99.6 +0.03 — 1784 130.8 — — — — +26 -227 -13 41.5% -0.58 69–75 (48%) 67–61 (52%) 104.3 +0.87

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.