H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Slava Dosedel vs Guillaume Raoux H2H: 0-1
Guillaume Raoux holds a 1–0 lead over Slava Dosedel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Guillaume Raoux leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Guillaume Raoux won the 1996 Rotterdam third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 56
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 1996* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Guillaume Raoux | 6-3 6-3 | Slava Dosedel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slava Dosedel | #1,027 | #26 | 1,122 | 1,825 | 190 | 184 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Guillaume Raoux | #1,033 | #35 | 1,041 | 1,806 | 175 | 222 | 44.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Slava Dosedel | Guillaume Raoux | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #448 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #220 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #201 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #104 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #68 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #93 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 |
| 1994 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #29 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 27–28 | 49.1% | #85 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| 1995 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #115 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #66 | 1,769 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #77 | 1,566 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #47 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #63 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #53 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 2000 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #64 | 1,722 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #137 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 |
| 2001 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #152 | 1,575 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #668 | 1,553 | 0 | 1 |