H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Slava Dosedel vs Henri Leconte H2H: 2-0
Slava Dosedel holds a 2–0 lead over Henri Leconte in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Slava Dosedel leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Slava Dosedel won the 1995 Prague third round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 63
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 1995* | Prague | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Slava Dosedel | 6-1 6-3 | Henri Leconte | Match data |
| Feb 28, 1991* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Slava Dosedel | 7-5 5-7 7-6(3) | Henri Leconte | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slava Dosedel | #1,027 | #26 | 1,122 | 1,825 | 190 | 184 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Henri Leconte | #1,355 | #5 | 948 | 2,064 | 344 | 242 | 58.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Slava Dosedel | Henri Leconte | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #440 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #440 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #201 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #29 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 |
| 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #30 | 1,828 | 0 | 1 |
| 1993 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #68 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #27 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 |
| 1994 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #29 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #16 | 1,932 | 0 | 4 |
| 1995 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #6 | 1,972 | 0 | 6 |
| 1996 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #66 | 1,769 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #21 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 |
| 1997 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 47–19 | 71.2% | #9 | 1,936 | 0 | 8 |
| 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #115 | 1,798 | 0 | 8 |
| 1999 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #63 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 8 |
| 2000 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #64 | 1,722 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #161 | 1,716 | 0 | 8 |
| 2001 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #152 | 1,575 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #61 | 1,807 | 0 | 8 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #101 | 1,832 | 0 | 9 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,737 | 0 | 9 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #134 | 1,632 | 0 | 9 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1001 | 1,558 | 0 | 9 |