H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Slava Dosedel vs Hicham Arazi H2H: 1-1
Slava Dosedel and Hicham Arazi are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Slava Dosedel leads 1–0 on clay, while Hicham Arazi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Hicham Arazi won the 2000 Indian Wells Masters third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
MAR
Age 52
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2000* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Hicham Arazi | 6-4 6-2 | Slava Dosedel | Match data |
| Aug 1, 1997* | Amsterdam | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Slava Dosedel | 7-5 7-6(7) | Hicham Arazi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slava Dosedel | #1,027 | #26 | 1,122 | 1,825 | 190 | 184 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Hicham Arazi | #793 | #22 | 1,240 | 1,864 | 202 | 213 | 48.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Slava Dosedel | Hicham Arazi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #141 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #201 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #79 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #38 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 |
| 1993 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #68 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #36 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 1994 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #29 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 |
| 1995 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #30 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #66 | 1,769 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #25 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #52 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #63 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #62 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 2000 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #64 | 1,722 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #897 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 2001 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #152 | 1,575 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |