H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Slava Dosedel vs Ivo Heuberger H2H: 1-1
Slava Dosedel and Ivo Heuberger are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ivo Heuberger leads 1–0 on carpet, while Slava Dosedel leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ivo Heuberger won the 2001 Milan third round 6-2 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 50
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2001* | Milan | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Ivo Heuberger | 6-2 7-6(4) | Slava Dosedel | Match data |
| Jul 9, 1998* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Slava Dosedel | 7-6(4) 6-3 | Ivo Heuberger | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slava Dosedel | #1,027 | #26 | 1,122 | 1,825 | 190 | 184 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Ivo Heuberger | #1,496 | #102 | 398 | 1,639 | 33 | 72 | 31.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Slava Dosedel | Ivo Heuberger | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #188 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #201 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #221 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #222 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #68 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #112 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #29 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #127 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #155 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #66 | 1,769 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #214 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #63 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #64 | 1,722 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #152 | 1,575 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |