H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Slava Dosedel vs Jakob Hlasek H2H: 0-1
Jakob Hlasek holds a 1–0 lead over Slava Dosedel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jakob Hlasek leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jakob Hlasek won the 1991 Rotterdam fourth round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 61
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 1991* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Jakob Hlasek | 6-3 6-4 | Slava Dosedel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slava Dosedel | #1,027 | #26 | 1,122 | 1,825 | 190 | 184 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Jakob Hlasek | #583 | #7 | 1,308 | 2,062 | 389 | 300 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Slava Dosedel | Jakob Hlasek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #227 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #201 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #91 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #33 | 1,784 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #68 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #32 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #29 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #23 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 44–14 | 75.9% | #8 | 2,050 | 0 | 2 |
| 1996 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #66 | 1,769 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 |
| 1997 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #17 | 1,937 | 0 | 4 |
| 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #20 | 1,869 | 0 | 5 |
| 1999 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #63 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #36 | 1,806 | 0 | 5 |
| 2000 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #64 | 1,722 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #71 | 1,713 | 0 | 5 |
| 2001 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #152 | 1,575 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,676 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #35 | 1,783 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #74 | 1,751 | 0 | 5 |