H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Slava Dosedel vs Jan Siemerink H2H: 0-4
Jan Siemerink holds a 4–0 lead over Slava Dosedel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jan Siemerink leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jan Siemerink won the 1998 Wimbledon first round 6-1 6-4 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
NED
Age 56
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 1998* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Jan Siemerink | 6-1 6-4 7-6(3) | Slava Dosedel | Match data |
| Jun 30, 1995* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Jan Siemerink | 6-3 6-2 6-2 | Slava Dosedel | Match data |
| Oct 20, 1994* | Vienna | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Jan Siemerink | 7-6(2) 6-2 | Slava Dosedel | Match data |
| Aug 15, 1991* | New Haven | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jan Siemerink | 6-3 6-1 | Slava Dosedel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slava Dosedel | #1,027 | #26 | 1,122 | 1,825 | 190 | 184 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Jan Siemerink | #987 | #14 | 1,863 | 1,908 | 261 | 260 | 50.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Slava Dosedel | Jan Siemerink | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #135 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #26 | 1,756 | 0 | 1 |
| 1991 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #201 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #57 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 |
| 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #53 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 1993 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #68 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #81 | 1,685 | 0 | 1 |
| 1994 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #29 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #21 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| 1995 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #15 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 |
| 1996 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #66 | 1,769 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 18–27 | 40.0% | #78 | 1,738 | 0 | 2 |
| 1997 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 38–24 | 61.3% | #19 | 1,809 | 0 | 4 |
| 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #88 | 1,665 | 0 | 4 |
| 1999 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #63 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #104 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 |
| 2000 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #64 | 1,722 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #127 | 1,564 | 0 | 4 |
| 2001 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #152 | 1,575 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #438 | 1,532 | 0 | 4 |