H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Slava Dosedel vs Jason Stoltenberg H2H: 1-1
Slava Dosedel and Jason Stoltenberg are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Slava Dosedel leads 1–0 on clay, while Jason Stoltenberg leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Slava Dosedel won the 1995 Rome Masters second round 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 1995* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Slava Dosedel | 6-1 6-0 | Jason Stoltenberg | Match data |
| Oct 2, 1991* | Sydney Indoor | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Jason Stoltenberg | 7-5 6-3 | Slava Dosedel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slava Dosedel | #1,027 | #26 | 1,122 | 1,825 | 190 | 184 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Jason Stoltenberg | #556 | #19 | 1,299 | 1,923 | 294 | 259 | 53.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Slava Dosedel | Jason Stoltenberg | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #413 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #70 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #201 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #84 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #108 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #68 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #29 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #168 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #44 | 1,694 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #66 | 1,769 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 |
| 1997 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #80 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 |
| 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #31 | 1,767 | 0 | 3 |
| 1999 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #63 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #79 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 |
| 2000 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #64 | 1,722 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #27 | 1,789 | 0 | 4 |
| 2001 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #152 | 1,575 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #66 | 1,689 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,681 | 0 | 4 |