H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Slava Dosedel vs Jim Courier H2H: 3-1
Slava Dosedel holds a 3–1 lead over Jim Courier in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Slava Dosedel leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Slava Dosedel won the 1999 US Open first round 6-4 6-4 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 1999* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Slava Dosedel | 6-4 6-4 7-6(5) | Jim Courier | Match data |
| Jan 7, 1999* | Adelaide | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Slava Dosedel | 7-5 6-3 | Jim Courier | Match data |
| Jan 17, 1997* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Jim Courier | 4-6 6-2 3-6 6-4 6-4 | Slava Dosedel | Match data |
| May 15, 1994* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Clay | Slava Dosedel | 1-6 6-3 6-4 | Jim Courier | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slava Dosedel | #1,027 | #26 | 1,122 | 1,825 | 190 | 184 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Jim Courier | #728 | #1 | 3,973 | 2,218 | 487 | 222 | 68.7% | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 23 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Slava Dosedel | Jim Courier | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #346 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #43 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #201 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #24 | 1,880 | 0 | 1 |
| 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #25 | 1,861 | 0 | 1 |
| 1993 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #68 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 57–17 | 77.0% | #2 | 2,047 | 1 | 4 |
| 1994 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #29 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 66–15 | 81.5% | #1 | 2,086 | 3 | 9 |
| 1995 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 58–17 | 77.3% | #3 | 1,959 | 4 | 14 |
| 1996 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #66 | 1,769 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #13 | 1,888 | 4 | 14 |
| 1997 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 59–20 | 74.7% | #8 | 1,988 | 4 | 18 |
| 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #26 | 1,848 | 4 | 19 |
| 1999 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #63 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #21 | 1,827 | 4 | 22 |
| 2000 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #64 | 1,722 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #77 | 1,738 | 4 | 23 |
| 2001 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #152 | 1,575 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #32 | 1,795 | 4 | 23 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #290 | 1,737 | 4 | 23 |