H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Slava Dosedel vs Marc Rosset H2H: 3-0
Slava Dosedel holds a 3–0 lead over Marc Rosset in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Slava Dosedel leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Slava Dosedel won the 1998 Stuttgart Outdoor second round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 55
Right-Handed
201 cm / 6'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 1998* | Stuttgart Outdoor | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Slava Dosedel | 6-3 6-4 | Marc Rosset | Match data |
| Mar 19, 1997* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Slava Dosedel | 5-7 6-2 7-5 | Marc Rosset | Match data |
| Apr 20, 1994* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Slava Dosedel | 6-2 6-3 | Marc Rosset | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slava Dosedel | #1,027 | #26 | 1,122 | 1,825 | 190 | 184 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Marc Rosset | #1,490 | #9 | 2,069 | 1,950 | 398 | 334 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 14 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Slava Dosedel | Marc Rosset | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #474 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 7–2 | 77.8% | #45 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 1991 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #201 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #22 | 1,811 | 0 | 2 |
| 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #60 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 |
| 1993 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #68 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #35 | 1,826 | 0 | 3 |
| 1994 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #29 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #16 | 1,922 | 0 | 6 |
| 1995 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #14 | 1,925 | 0 | 8 |
| 1996 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #66 | 1,769 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #15 | 1,814 | 0 | 10 |
| 1997 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #22 | 1,771 | 0 | 10 |
| 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 32–31 | 50.8% | #31 | 1,630 | 0 | 11 |
| 1999 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #63 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,749 | 0 | 11 |
| 2000 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #64 | 1,722 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #45 | 1,658 | 0 | 12 |
| 2001 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #152 | 1,575 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #28 | 1,723 | 0 | 14 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #119 | 1,601 | 0 | 14 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,597 | 0 | 14 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #122 | 1,586 | 0 | 14 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #214 | 1,546 | 0 | 14 |