H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Slava Dosedel vs Nicolas Escude H2H: 1-2
Nicolas Escude holds a 2–1 lead over Slava Dosedel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Escude leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Slava Dosedel leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nicolas Escude won the 2000 Toulouse third round 6-3 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 50
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2000* | Toulouse | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Nicolas Escude | 6-3 7-6(5) | Slava Dosedel | Match data |
| Apr 20, 2000* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Slava Dosedel | 6-0 6-3 | Nicolas Escude | Match data |
| Jan 7, 2000* | Adelaide | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Nicolas Escude | 7-6(5) 6-4 | Slava Dosedel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slava Dosedel | #1,027 | #26 | 1,122 | 1,825 | 190 | 184 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Nicolas Escude | #1,071 | #17 | 1,357 | 1,909 | 157 | 124 | 55.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Slava Dosedel | Nicolas Escude | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #670 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #189 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #201 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #68 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #37 | 1,820 | 0 | 1 |
| 1994 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #29 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #48 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 |
| 1995 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #27 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 |
| 1996 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #66 | 1,769 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 29–15 | 65.9% | #34 | 1,842 | 0 | 3 |
| 1997 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #114 | 1,790 | 0 | 3 |
| 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #64 | 1,829 | 0 | 4 |
| 1999 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #63 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #64 | 1,722 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #152 | 1,575 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |