H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Slava Dosedel vs Nicolas Lapentti H2H: 3-1
Slava Dosedel holds a 3–1 lead over Nicolas Lapentti in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Slava Dosedel leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nicolas Lapentti won the 2001 Roland Garros first round 7-6(3) 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
ECU
Age 49
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2001* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Nicolas Lapentti | 7-6(3) 6-1 6-1 | Slava Dosedel | Match data |
| Jun 28, 2000* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Slava Dosedel | 6-3 6-2 0-6 6-1 | Nicolas Lapentti | Match data |
| May 2, 1998* | Prague | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Slava Dosedel | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | Nicolas Lapentti | Match data |
| Mar 17, 1998* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Slava Dosedel | 3-6 7-6(11) 6-4 | Nicolas Lapentti | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slava Dosedel | #1,027 | #26 | 1,122 | 1,825 | 190 | 184 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Nicolas Lapentti | #885 | #6 | 2,293 | 1,935 | 282 | 280 | 50.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Slava Dosedel | Nicolas Lapentti | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 5–0 | 100.0% | #109 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #121 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 1991 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #201 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #63 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 16–29 | 35.6% | #90 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 1993 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #68 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 52–24 | 68.4% | #8 | 1,883 | 0 | 3 |
| 1994 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #29 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 40–28 | 58.8% | #24 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 |
| 1995 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #23 | 1,837 | 0 | 4 |
| 1996 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #66 | 1,769 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #29 | 1,714 | 0 | 5 |
| 1997 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #57 | 1,697 | 0 | 5 |
| 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #122 | 1,600 | 0 | 5 |
| 1999 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #63 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #95 | 1,579 | 0 | 5 |
| 2000 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #64 | 1,722 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #67 | 1,682 | 0 | 5 |
| 2001 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #152 | 1,575 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #109 | 1,611 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #86 | 1,658 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #97 | 1,668 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #447 | 1,582 | 0 | 5 |