H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Slava Dosedel vs Paolo Cane H2H: 1-0
Slava Dosedel holds a 1–0 lead over Paolo Cane in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Slava Dosedel leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Slava Dosedel won the 1994 Rome Masters third round 7-6(4) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 61
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 1994* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Slava Dosedel | 7-6(4) 6-3 | Paolo Cane | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slava Dosedel | #1,027 | #26 | 1,122 | 1,825 | 190 | 184 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Paolo Cane | #1,381 | #26 | 565 | 1,835 | 121 | 122 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Slava Dosedel | Paolo Cane | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #201 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #199 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #44 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 |
| 1993 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #68 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #51 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 |
| 1994 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #29 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #81 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 1995 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 24–14 | 63.2% | #33 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 |
| 1996 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #66 | 1,769 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #109 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 |
| 1997 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #122 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 |
| 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #163 | 1,654 | 0 | 3 |
| 1999 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #63 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,596 | 0 | 3 |
| 2000 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #64 | 1,722 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #145 | 1,598 | 0 | 3 |
| 2001 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #152 | 1,575 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #635 | 1,581 | 0 | 3 |