H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Slava Dosedel vs Patrick Rafter H2H: 1-1
Slava Dosedel and Patrick Rafter are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Patrick Rafter leads 1–0 on grass, while Slava Dosedel leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Patrick Rafter won the 2001 Wimbledon second round 7-5 4-6 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2001* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Patrick Rafter | 7-5 4-6 6-4 6-1 | Slava Dosedel | Match data |
| Jan 8, 1999* | Adelaide | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Slava Dosedel | 7-5 6-4 | Patrick Rafter | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slava Dosedel | #1,027 | #26 | 1,122 | 1,825 | 190 | 184 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Patrick Rafter | #224 | #1 | 3,673 | 2,104 | 332 | 177 | 65.2% | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Slava Dosedel | Patrick Rafter | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #293 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #201 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #20 | 1,803 | 0 | 1 |
| 1993 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #68 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #66 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 |
| 1994 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #29 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #62 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 |
| 1995 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 63–26 | 70.8% | #2 | 2,035 | 1 | 2 |
| 1996 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #66 | 1,769 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 58–20 | 74.4% | #4 | 2,010 | 2 | 8 |
| 1997 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #16 | 1,933 | 2 | 9 |
| 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #15 | 1,889 | 2 | 10 |
| 1999 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #63 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 42–15 | 73.7% | #7 | 1,989 | 2 | 11 |
| 2000 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #64 | 1,722 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #152 | 1,575 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |