H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Slava Dosedel vs Paul Haarhuis H2H: 2-1
Slava Dosedel holds a 2–1 lead over Paul Haarhuis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Slava Dosedel leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Slava Dosedel won the 1997 Indian Wells Masters second round 6-7(5) 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
NED
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 1997* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Slava Dosedel | 6-7(5) 6-2 6-1 | Paul Haarhuis | Match data |
| Apr 12, 1995* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Paul Haarhuis | 0-6 6-2 6-2 | Slava Dosedel | Match data |
| Apr 21, 1994* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Slava Dosedel | 6-2 6-0 | Paul Haarhuis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slava Dosedel | #1,027 | #26 | 1,122 | 1,825 | 190 | 184 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Paul Haarhuis | #623 | #18 | 1,341 | 1,885 | 250 | 245 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Slava Dosedel | Paul Haarhuis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #462 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #57 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #201 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #54 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #68 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #39 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #29 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #42 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #37 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #66 | 1,769 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #19 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #25 | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #70 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #63 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| 2000 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #64 | 1,722 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #178 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 |
| 2001 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #152 | 1,575 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |