H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Slava Dosedel vs Paul Haarhuis H2H: 2-1

Slava Dosedel holds a 2–1 lead over Paul Haarhuis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Slava Dosedel leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Slava Dosedel won the 1997 Indian Wells Open round of 64 6-7(5) 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Slava Dosedel
CZE Age 56 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Paul Haarhuis
NED Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Slava Dosedel #59 6-7(5) 6-2 6-1 Paul Haarhuis #24 Match data Mar 12, 1997* R64 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Paul Haarhuis #35 0-6 6-2 6-2 Slava Dosedel #26 Match data Apr 12, 1995* R64 Barcelona Open ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Clay
Slava Dosedel #60 6-2 6-0 Paul Haarhuis #23 Match data Apr 21, 1994* R32 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Slava Dosedel #1,027 #26 1,122 1,826 190 185 50.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Paul Haarhuis #623 #18 1,341 1,887 251 247 50.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Slava Dosedel Paul Haarhuis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1989 0–2 0.0% #265 1,468 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1990 1–3 25.0% #146 1,467 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1991 4–13 23.5% #201 1,444 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1992 3–3 50.0% #159 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1993 16–15 51.6% #68 1,608 0 0 1988 0–1 0.0% #462 1,488 0 0
23 1994 36–23 61.0% #29 1,733 0 0 1989 9–7 56.2% #57 1,635 0 0
24 1995 27–25 51.9% #60 1,696 0 1 1990 20–25 44.4% #54 1,670 0 0
25 1996 21–13 61.8% #66 1,768 0 2 1991 25–25 50.0% #37 1,729 0 0
26 1997 24–18 57.1% #43 1,763 0 3 1992 33–29 53.2% #39 1,684 0 0
27 1998 21–21 50.0% #64 1,690 0 3 1993 30–26 53.6% #42 1,764 0 0
28 1999 15–12 55.6% #63 1,740 0 3 1994 26–22 54.2% #37 1,715 0 0
29 2000 17–21 44.7% #64 1,704 0 3 1995 33–24 57.9% #19 1,715 0 1
30 2001 5–16 23.8% #152 1,568 0 3 1996 30–28 51.7% #25 1,735 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 1997 19–25 43.2% #70 1,674 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 1998 20–20 50.0% #74 1,660 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 1999 6–15 28.6% #178 1,620 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Slava Dosedel Paul Haarhuis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1989 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1991 2 6 8 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1993 2 2 4 50.0% 14 12 26 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1988 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1994 — — — — 35 20 55 63.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1989 5 3 8 62.5% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1995 — — — — 21 18 39 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1990 3 6 9 33.3% 8 11 19 42.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
25 1996 1 1 2 50.0% 20 11 31 64.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 14 11 25 56.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 1997 8 8 16 50.0% 16 7 23 69.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 20 12 32 62.5% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9%
27 1998 5 8 13 38.5% 15 11 26 57.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1993 12 10 22 54.5% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 6 14 57.1%
28 1999 8 6 14 57.1% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1994 10 9 19 52.6% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5%
29 2000 11 12 23 47.8% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1995 13 8 21 61.9% 3 7 10 30.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 11 6 17 64.7%
30 2001 1 7 8 12.5% 3 7 10 30.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 13 13 26 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 7 11 18 38.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 5 8 37.5%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 10 8 18 55.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 6 10 40.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 4 7 11 36.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 38 51 89 42.7% 141 110 251 56.2% 5 10 15 33.3% 6 14 20 30.0% — 111 98 209 53.1% 56 70 126 44.4% 28 25 53 52.8% 56 54 110 50.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 320/369 of Slava Dosedel's and 380/436 of Paul Haarhuis's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Slava Dosedel Paul Haarhuis
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 1991 14/17 4.0 5.3 48.4% 67.2% 50.9% 45.0% 32.3% 58.2% 34.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1992 5/6 1.8 2.2 73.6% 55.7% 58.2% 50.3% 42.2% 54.9% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1993 28/31 2.4 2.5 65.2% 60.9% 47.1% 47.5% 46.3% 56.1% 43.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1994 54/59 1.9 2.7 68.8% 63.7% 48.8% 52.1% 49.4% 57.9% 44.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1995 45/52 2.9 2.4 65.2% 65.6% 50.0% 56.9% 47.0% 59.5% 41.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 1996 29/34 2.0 1.4 68.4% 65.5% 51.1% 57.7% 43.7% 60.2% 45.0% 1991 44/50 3.8 2.3 58.4% 68.3% 52.1% 45.9% 48.3% 61.5% 40.2%
26 1997 35/42 3.2 2.4 66.1% 65.9% 52.9% 52.4% 43.1% 61.3% 41.8% 1992 55/62 4.0 1.9 59.8% 70.2% 51.8% 63.1% 41.7% 62.7% 38.0%
27 1998 38/42 3.3 2.7 61.6% 66.7% 48.4% 58.9% 42.4% 59.6% 41.6% 1993 51/56 4.0 2.0 59.5% 69.2% 52.2% 60.9% 43.4% 62.2% 38.2%
28 1999 21/27 3.9 2.4 66.9% 66.1% 50.4% 61.8% 41.9% 60.8% 41.7% 1994 43/48 4.2 2.0 59.7% 68.8% 50.0% 64.0% 48.8% 61.1% 37.1%
29 2000 32/38 1.8 2.3 69.3% 65.2% 52.2% 59.5% 42.1% 60.7% 41.0% 1995 55/57 4.6 2.6 59.8% 68.3% 50.7% 54.3% 40.4% 61.0% 36.3%
30 2001 19/21 2.0 3.8 63.4% 60.5% 43.2% 54.7% 47.2% 54.3% 37.6% 1996 48/58 4.2 1.8 62.5% 68.2% 51.8% 50.8% 44.9% 62.2% 35.8%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 37/44 5.3 2.8 59.7% 71.9% 51.2% 59.4% 46.1% 63.5% 37.4%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 30/40 5.8 3.2 56.4% 71.4% 50.5% 60.7% 45.0% 62.5% 36.0%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 17/21 5.3 2.4 61.5% 68.9% 48.6% 61.8% 29.9% 61.0% 36.2%
Career — 320/375 2.6 2.6 65.6% 64.6% 49.8% 54.9% 44.5% 59.0% 42.0% — 380/498 4.4 2.3 59.7% 69.4% 51.2% 57.5% 43.9% 62.0% 37.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Slava Dosedel Paul Haarhuis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1989 1469 96.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–2 — — +0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 1467 113.7 — — — — — +37 — 33.3% -0.89 0–1 1–0 — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1991 1445 114.9 -2.50 -2.28 0.827 46.2% +54 +61 — 31.1% -0.98 2–4 (33%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1992 1497 106.4 -0.76 -0.97 0.911 48.6% — +42 — 33.3% -1.42 1–0 0–1 — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1993 1608 124.0 -3.61 +2.59 0.988 49.7% -110 +72 — 52.8% +0.04 3–2 (60%) 3–2 (60%) — +2.06 1988 1489 98.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.04
23 1994 1734 143.4 -1.39 +4.58 1.062 51.3% — +97 — 56.7% +0.38 13–5 (72%) 8–7 (53%) — +0.20 1989 1636 132.2 — — — — -19 -43 — 54.3% +0.30 1–2 (33%) 5–2 (71%) — +0.52
24 1995 1697 126.8 -1.34 +1.49 1.022 50.5% -185 +56 — 52.0% +0.22 7–9 (44%) 8–5 (62%) — +2.45 1990 1670 140.9 — — — — -4 -37 -64 46.9% -0.14 6–8 (43%) 9–12 (43%) — -1.33
25 1996 1769 147.2 -0.26 +4.43 1.131 52.5% -253 +59 — 61.8% +0.87 4–5 (44%) 5–9 (36%) — -1.58 1991 1730 144.8 +0.85 +1.66 1.042 50.8% +15 -61 -171 51.1% +0.31 7–6 (54%) 6–5 (55%) — -2.69
26 1997 1763 139.2 -0.53 +2.85 1.080 51.3% -158 +141 — 51.8% +0.17 11–6 (65%) 13–6 (68%) — -0.78 1992 1685 143.9 +1.01 +0.37 1.019 50.2% +33 -24 — 50.3% +0.07 9–8 (53%) 12–15 (44%) — -0.46
27 1998 1690 137.3 -1.23 +2.78 1.030 50.6% -78 +130 -150 47.5% -0.19 5–6 (45%) 10–11 (48%) — -1.69 1993 1764 141.2 +1.06 +0.08 1.010 50.5% -19 +4 -232 53.5% +0.17 8–9 (47%) 11–11 (50%) — -0.40
28 1999 1741 128.9 +0.19 +2.72 1.065 50.9% -31 +30 — 59.5% +0.30 2–7 (22%) 7–4 (64%) — +1.11 1994 1715 147.9 +0.13 -0.29 0.953 49.4% +46 +62 — 50.8% -0.08 10–4 (71%) 8–9 (47%) — -1.32
29 2000 1705 136.5 -0.65 +3.11 1.046 50.6% -5 +2 — 49.0% +0.08 2–8 (20%) 6–6 (50%) — -1.55 1995 1716 137.5 -0.59 -0.36 0.931 48.7% +46 -19 -93 50.0% -0.17 18–5 (78%) 11–12 (48%) — +0.15
30 2001 1569 123.5 -4.55 -0.10 0.823 46.3% +38 +58 — 29.8% -1.35 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) — -0.94 1996 1736 139.0 +0.20 -0.84 0.946 49.0% +10 -47 -15 46.6% -0.19 12–5 (71%) 13–16 (45%) — +0.88
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1675 138.9 +1.41 -0.41 1.025 50.4% -16 -7 +99 48.7% +0.13 5–13 (28%) 14–12 (54%) — -0.68
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1660 132.7 +0.38 -1.61 0.960 49.6% +19 -37 +79 48.4% +0.07 8–5 (62%) 6–7 (46%) — +1.10
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1620 127.7 -0.68 -0.73 0.928 48.6% +35 -73 +103 42.4% -0.44 0–6 (0%) 2–7 (22%) — -1.04
Career — 1826 140.0 -1.41 +2.62 1.023 50.4% -61 +78 -150 50.4% +0.02 52–58 (47%) 64–60 (52%) 99.6 +0.03 — 1888 146.0 +0.48 -0.13 0.982 49.8% +17 -22 -15 49.4% 0.00 84–71 (54%) 97–108 (47%) 102.8 -1.05

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.