H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Slava Dosedel vs Pete Sampras H2H: 0-2
Pete Sampras holds a 2–0 lead over Slava Dosedel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Pete Sampras leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pete Sampras won the 2000 Australian Open fourth round 6-1 6-2 3-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 54
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2000* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Pete Sampras | 6-1 6-2 3-6 6-1 | Slava Dosedel | Match data |
| May 15, 1994* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | SF | Clay | Pete Sampras | 6-1 6-2 | Slava Dosedel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slava Dosedel | #1,027 | #26 | 1,122 | 1,825 | 190 | 184 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Pete Sampras | #34 | #1 | 5,792 | 2,265 | 737 | 208 | 78.0% | 14 | 11 | 7 | 0 | 32 | 64 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Slava Dosedel | Pete Sampras | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #97 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #81 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #201 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #5 | 2,047 | 1 | 4 |
| 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 52–17 | 75.4% | #6 | 2,091 | 1 | 8 |
| 1993 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #68 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 66–15 | 81.5% | #3 | 2,118 | 1 | 13 |
| 1994 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #29 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 82–15 | 84.5% | #1 | 2,126 | 3 | 21 |
| 1995 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 74–9 | 89.2% | #1 | 2,196 | 5 | 31 |
| 1996 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #66 | 1,769 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 66–17 | 79.5% | #1 | 2,134 | 7 | 36 |
| 1997 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 66–10 | 86.8% | #1 | 2,183 | 8 | 44 |
| 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 55–10 | 84.6% | #1 | 2,187 | 10 | 52 |
| 1999 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #63 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 61–18 | 77.2% | #1 | 2,042 | 11 | 56 |
| 2000 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #64 | 1,722 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 38–9 | 80.9% | #3 | 2,117 | 12 | 61 |
| 2001 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #152 | 1,575 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 40–11 | 78.4% | #3 | 2,068 | 13 | 63 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 33–15 | 68.8% | #10 | 2,003 | 13 | 63 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 25–14 | 64.1% | #13 | 1,977 | 14 | 64 |