H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Slava Dosedel vs Richard Krajicek H2H: 0-2
Richard Krajicek holds a 2–0 lead over Slava Dosedel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Richard Krajicek leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Richard Krajicek won the 1998 S Hertogenbosch fourth round 7-6(3) 6-7(4) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
NED
Age 54
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 1998* | S Hertogenbosch | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Richard Krajicek | 7-6(3) 6-7(4) 6-3 | Slava Dosedel | Match data |
| Feb 23, 1995* | Stuttgart Indoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Richard Krajicek | 6-4 2-6 6-2 | Slava Dosedel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slava Dosedel | #1,027 | #26 | 1,122 | 1,825 | 190 | 184 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Richard Krajicek | #1,044 | #4 | 3,130 | 2,044 | 408 | 207 | 66.3% | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 17 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Slava Dosedel | Richard Krajicek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #45 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #10 | 1,950 | 0 | 3 |
| 1991 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #201 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #15 | 1,888 | 0 | 4 |
| 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #17 | 1,883 | 0 | 7 |
| 1993 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #68 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,832 | 0 | 9 |
| 1994 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #29 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 46–24 | 65.7% | #7 | 1,876 | 1 | 10 |
| 1995 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 50–19 | 72.5% | #11 | 1,969 | 1 | 13 |
| 1996 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #66 | 1,769 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #10 | 1,975 | 1 | 15 |
| 1997 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #10 | 1,879 | 1 | 17 |
| 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #36 | 1,885 | 1 | 17 |
| 1999 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #63 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #112 | 1,839 | 1 | 17 |
| 2000 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #64 | 1,722 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #147 | 1,762 | 1 | 17 |
| 2001 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #152 | 1,575 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |