H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Slava Dosedel vs Thomas Muster H2H: 1-3
Thomas Muster holds a 3–1 lead over Slava Dosedel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Thomas Muster leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Slava Dosedel won the 1997 Kitzbuhel fourth round 2-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 58
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 1997* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Slava Dosedel | 2-6 6-3 6-4 | Thomas Muster | Match data |
| Mar 15, 1997* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Thomas Muster | 6-4 6-4 | Slava Dosedel | Match data |
| Aug 14, 1993* | San Marino | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Thomas Muster | 6-2 6-3 | Slava Dosedel | Match data |
| Feb 6, 1993* | Dubai | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Thomas Muster | 6-0 6-3 | Slava Dosedel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slava Dosedel | #1,027 | #26 | 1,122 | 1,825 | 190 | 184 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Thomas Muster | #1,092 | #1 | 4,474 | 2,161 | 590 | 267 | 68.8% | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 44 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Slava Dosedel | Thomas Muster | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #311 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #98 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #201 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #47 | 1,740 | 0 | 1 |
| 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #56 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 |
| 1993 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #68 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 47–16 | 74.6% | #16 | 1,914 | 0 | 5 |
| 1994 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #29 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #21 | 1,877 | 0 | 5 |
| 1995 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #7 | 1,862 | 0 | 8 |
| 1996 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #66 | 1,769 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #35 | 1,835 | 0 | 10 |
| 1997 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 39–22 | 63.9% | #18 | 1,793 | 0 | 13 |
| 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 77–21 | 78.6% | #9 | 1,953 | 0 | 20 |
| 1999 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #63 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 54–26 | 67.5% | #16 | 1,815 | 0 | 23 |
| 2000 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #64 | 1,722 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 84–17 | 83.2% | #3 | 1,990 | 1 | 35 |
| 2001 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #152 | 1,575 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 65–21 | 75.6% | #5 | 1,915 | 1 | 42 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 43–23 | 65.2% | #9 | 1,820 | 1 | 44 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #25 | 1,800 | 1 | 44 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #189 | 1,674 | 1 | 44 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #980 | 1,655 | 1 | 44 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1075 | 1,608 | 1 | 44 |