H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Slava Dosedel vs Tim Henman H2H: 0-1
Tim Henman holds a 1–0 lead over Slava Dosedel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tim Henman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2001 Copenhagen third round 6-4 2-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 51
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2001* | Copenhagen | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Tim Henman | 6-4 2-6 6-1 | Slava Dosedel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slava Dosedel | #1,027 | #26 | 1,122 | 1,825 | 190 | 184 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Tim Henman | #615 | #4 | 2,826 | 2,027 | 468 | 260 | 64.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Slava Dosedel | Tim Henman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #167 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #201 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,821 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #17 | 1,895 | 0 | 2 |
| 1993 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #68 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 55–29 | 65.5% | #7 | 1,960 | 0 | 4 |
| 1994 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #29 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #12 | 1,785 | 0 | 4 |
| 1995 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 55–23 | 70.5% | #10 | 1,953 | 0 | 6 |
| 1996 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #66 | 1,769 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #9 | 1,924 | 0 | 8 |
| 1997 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 45–18 | 71.4% | #8 | 1,867 | 0 | 9 |
| 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #15 | 1,970 | 0 | 11 |
| 1999 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #63 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 41–20 | 67.2% | #6 | 1,926 | 0 | 11 |
| 2000 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #64 | 1,722 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 11 |
| 2001 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #152 | 1,575 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #39 | 1,868 | 0 | 11 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #292 | 1,684 | 0 | 11 |