H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Slava Dosedel vs Tim Henman H2H: 0-1

Tim Henman holds a 1–0 lead over Slava Dosedel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tim Henman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2001 Copenhagen round of 32 6-4 2-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Slava Dosedel
CZE Age 56 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Tim Henman
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tim Henman #10 6-4 2-6 6-1 Slava Dosedel #86 Match data Feb 15, 2001* R32 Copenhagen ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Slava Dosedel #1,027 #26 1,122 1,826 190 185 50.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,026 469 263 64.1% 0 1 0 1 9 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Slava Dosedel Tim Henman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1989 0–2 0.0% #265 1,468 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1990 1–3 25.0% #146 1,467 0 0 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0
20 1991 4–13 23.5% #201 1,444 0 0 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,571 0 0
21 1992 3–3 50.0% #159 1,497 0 0 1996 38–25 60.3% #29 1,811 0 0
22 1993 16–15 51.6% #68 1,608 0 0 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2
23 1994 36–23 61.0% #29 1,733 0 0 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4
24 1995 27–25 51.9% #60 1,696 0 1 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,786 0 4
25 1996 21–13 61.8% #66 1,768 0 2 2000 55–24 69.6% #10 1,939 0 6
26 1997 24–18 57.1% #43 1,763 0 3 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,922 0 8
27 1998 21–21 50.0% #64 1,690 0 3 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,888 0 9
28 1999 15–12 55.6% #63 1,740 0 3 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,971 0 11
29 2000 17–21 44.7% #64 1,704 0 3 2004 41–21 66.1% #6 1,914 0 11
30 2001 5–16 23.8% #152 1,568 0 3 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,867 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,683 0 11

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Slava Dosedel Tim Henman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1989 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 1994 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
20 1991 2 6 8 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 1995 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1996 14 12 26 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 17 9 26 65.4%
22 1993 2 2 4 50.0% 14 12 26 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1997 27 11 38 71.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 11 6 17 64.7%
23 1994 — — — — 35 20 55 63.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1998 40 18 58 69.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 4 9 55.6%
24 1995 — — — — 21 18 39 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1999 16 14 30 53.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 9 4 13 69.2%
25 1996 1 1 2 50.0% 20 11 31 64.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 41 14 55 74.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 1997 8 8 16 50.0% 16 7 23 69.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 28 12 40 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 1 6 83.3%
27 1998 5 8 13 38.5% 15 11 26 57.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2002 27 10 37 73.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 2 5 60.0%
28 1999 8 6 14 57.1% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2003 10 9 19 52.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 8 1 9 88.9%
29 2000 11 12 23 47.8% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2004 23 13 36 63.9% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0%
30 2001 1 7 8 12.5% 3 7 10 30.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 15 11 26 57.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 19 13 32 59.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
Career — 38 51 89 42.7% 141 110 251 56.2% 5 10 15 33.3% 6 14 20 30.0% — 266 147 413 64.4% 56 46 102 54.9% 78 34 112 69.6% 69 36 105 65.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 320/369 of Slava Dosedel's and 644/732 of Tim Henman's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Slava Dosedel Tim Henman
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 5/8 3.0 2.6 62.7% 65.7% 41.8% 48.7% 36.9% 56.9% 33.4%
20 1991 14/17 4.0 5.3 48.4% 67.2% 50.9% 45.0% 32.3% 58.2% 34.6% 1995 11/14 3.7 5.0 55.9% 69.5% 47.7% 53.7% 54.6% 60.1% 34.7%
21 1992 5/6 1.8 2.2 73.6% 55.7% 58.2% 50.3% 42.2% 54.9% 41.0% 1996 50/63 7.1 3.7 56.7% 73.9% 51.4% 58.8% 39.0% 64.4% 36.7%
22 1993 28/31 2.4 2.5 65.2% 60.9% 47.1% 47.5% 46.3% 56.1% 43.4% 1997 63/70 8.3 4.8 51.2% 80.7% 50.4% 61.5% 38.9% 65.8% 38.3%
23 1994 54/59 1.9 2.7 68.8% 63.7% 48.8% 52.1% 49.4% 57.9% 44.8% 1998 71/84 7.2 4.1 52.9% 77.8% 50.0% 54.0% 45.5% 64.6% 39.3%
24 1995 45/52 2.9 2.4 65.2% 65.6% 50.0% 56.9% 47.0% 59.5% 41.4% 1999 57/66 7.0 3.8 54.9% 76.7% 50.5% 62.0% 41.3% 64.8% 40.2%
25 1996 29/34 2.0 1.4 68.4% 65.5% 51.1% 57.7% 43.7% 60.2% 45.0% 2000 62/79 7.0 4.1 55.2% 77.1% 50.9% 68.9% 40.4% 65.4% 41.2%
26 1997 35/42 3.2 2.4 66.1% 65.9% 52.9% 52.4% 43.1% 61.3% 41.8% 2001 58/69 4.7 3.1 60.9% 74.3% 53.1% 61.1% 47.4% 66.2% 42.8%
27 1998 38/42 3.3 2.7 61.6% 66.7% 48.4% 58.9% 42.4% 59.6% 41.6% 2002 54/63 3.4 2.2 64.4% 70.8% 52.9% 63.3% 45.7% 64.3% 40.8%
28 1999 21/27 3.9 2.4 66.9% 66.1% 50.4% 61.8% 41.9% 60.8% 41.7% 2003 45/46 4.8 3.7 58.8% 72.7% 51.8% 59.3% 47.9% 64.1% 39.5%
29 2000 32/38 1.8 2.3 69.3% 65.2% 52.2% 59.5% 42.1% 60.7% 41.0% 2004 60/62 6.1 4.1 58.7% 74.2% 55.5% 59.4% 49.0% 66.6% 39.1%
30 2001 19/21 2.0 3.8 63.4% 60.5% 43.2% 54.7% 47.2% 54.3% 37.6% 2005 41/41 4.4 3.3 61.9% 73.8% 52.4% 62.5% 45.6% 65.7% 38.2%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 51/51 4.7 2.3 61.5% 71.5% 51.9% 59.0% 48.7% 63.8% 38.9%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 16/16 7.6 4.3 62.5% 69.6% 51.9% 65.9% 40.5% 62.9% 34.5%
Career — 320/375 2.6 2.6 65.6% 64.6% 49.8% 54.9% 44.5% 59.0% 42.0% — 644/732 6.0 3.7 57.7% 74.8% 51.7% 60.7% 44.4% 64.9% 39.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Slava Dosedel Tim Henman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1989 1469 96.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–2 — — +0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 1467 113.7 — — — — — +37 — 33.3% -0.89 0–1 1–0 — -0.06 1994 1513 116.8 -1.59 -1.36 0.776 45.4% +47 — +42 40.0% -1.00 1–1 2–0 — -0.33
20 1991 1445 114.9 -2.50 -2.28 0.827 46.2% +54 +61 — 31.1% -0.98 2–4 (33%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.74 1995 1572 115.6 -2.09 -1.97 0.869 47.8% 0 — +26 45.7% -0.43 2–1 (67%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.04
21 1992 1497 106.4 -0.76 -0.97 0.911 48.6% — +42 — 33.3% -1.42 1–0 0–1 — -0.15 1996 1811 143.5 +1.77 -0.36 1.030 50.5% -28 — -52 58.2% +0.39 8–11 (42%) 24–14 (63%) — -0.81
22 1993 1608 124.0 -3.61 +2.59 0.988 49.7% -110 +72 — 52.8% +0.04 3–2 (60%) 3–2 (60%) — +2.06 1997 1896 147.8 +3.33 +0.92 1.120 51.9% 0 -414 -26 59.7% +0.52 17–9 (65%) 18–11 (62%) — +0.85
23 1994 1734 143.4 -1.39 +4.58 1.062 51.3% — +97 — 56.7% +0.38 13–5 (72%) 8–7 (53%) — +0.20 1998 1961 159.5 +2.85 +2.23 1.107 52.0% -1 -493 +17 61.8% +0.65 17–12 (59%) 16–10 (62%) — -1.62
24 1995 1697 126.8 -1.34 +1.49 1.022 50.5% -185 +56 — 52.0% +0.22 7–9 (44%) 8–5 (62%) — +2.45 1999 1787 151.2 +2.50 +2.30 1.142 52.1% -11 -152 +243 58.8% +0.71 13–13 (50%) 14–16 (47%) — +0.72
25 1996 1769 147.2 -0.26 +4.43 1.131 52.5% -253 +59 — 61.8% +0.87 4–5 (44%) 5–9 (36%) — -1.58 2000 1939 155.2 +3.31 +3.56 1.191 53.1% +29 -234 +63 66.7% +1.07 11–12 (48%) 17–10 (63%) — +0.25
26 1997 1763 139.2 -0.53 +2.85 1.080 51.3% -158 +141 — 51.8% +0.17 11–6 (65%) 13–6 (68%) — -0.78 2001 1922 152.8 +3.40 +4.67 1.266 54.3% -2 -179 +132 67.0% +1.29 11–12 (48%) 17–14 (55%) — +2.30
27 1998 1690 137.3 -1.23 +2.78 1.030 50.6% -78 +130 -150 47.5% -0.19 5–6 (45%) 10–11 (48%) — -1.69 2002 1888 153.2 +2.14 +3.42 1.145 52.4% +19 -133 +186 66.3% +1.06 14–8 (64%) 9–15 (38%) — +0.21
28 1999 1741 128.9 +0.19 +2.72 1.065 50.9% -31 +30 — 59.5% +0.30 2–7 (22%) 7–4 (64%) — +1.11 2003 1972 147.0 +1.73 +3.09 1.100 51.8% -9 -200 +151 60.0% +0.66 8–2 (80%) 10–8 (56%) — -2.72
29 2000 1705 136.5 -0.65 +3.11 1.046 50.6% -5 +2 — 49.0% +0.08 2–8 (20%) 6–6 (50%) — -1.55 2004 1914 154.9 +3.57 +2.65 1.174 52.8% +17 -34 +142 60.8% +0.86 11–7 (61%) 12–18 (40%) — +0.11
30 2001 1569 123.5 -4.55 -0.10 0.823 46.3% +38 +58 — 29.8% -1.35 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) — -0.94 2005 1746 146.2 +2.43 +1.53 1.114 51.8% +62 +91 +293 55.6% +0.50 6–8 (43%) 6–8 (43%) — +0.77
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1868 152.1 +1.77 +2.07 1.076 51.4% -18 -56 +205 59.5% +0.54 5–8 (38%) 10–7 (59%) — -2.94
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1684 119.8 -0.80 -0.33 0.931 49.2% +55 +34 +277 40.0% -0.34 1–8 (11%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.06
Career — 1826 140.0 -1.41 +2.62 1.023 50.4% -61 +78 -150 50.4% +0.02 52–58 (47%) 64–60 (52%) 99.6 +0.03 — 2026 155.9 +2.48 +2.23 1.121 52.1% +5 -155 +114 60.6% +0.70 125–112 (53%) 161–141 (53%) 96.1 -0.44

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.