H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Slava Dosedel vs Todd Martin H2H: 0-4
Todd Martin holds a 4–0 lead over Slava Dosedel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Todd Martin leads 3–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Todd Martin won the 1999 US Open quarterfinal 6-3 5-7 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 56
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 1999* | US Open | Grand Slam | QF | Hard | Todd Martin | 6-3 5-7 6-4 6-4 | Slava Dosedel | Match data |
| Apr 17, 1998* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Todd Martin | 6-3 7-5 | Slava Dosedel | Match data |
| Jun 2, 1995* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Todd Martin | 6-2 2-6 6-3 7-6(5) | Slava Dosedel | Match data |
| Apr 15, 1993* | Charlotte | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Todd Martin | 6-3 6-2 | Slava Dosedel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slava Dosedel | #1,027 | #26 | 1,122 | 1,825 | 190 | 184 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Todd Martin | #145 | #4 | 2,969 | 2,063 | 398 | 222 | 64.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Slava Dosedel | Todd Martin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #269 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #134 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #201 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #87 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #13 | 1,886 | 0 | 1 |
| 1993 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #68 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 50–19 | 72.5% | #10 | 1,943 | 0 | 3 |
| 1994 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #29 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #18 | 1,912 | 0 | 4 |
| 1995 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #12 | 1,926 | 0 | 5 |
| 1996 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #66 | 1,769 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 13–7 | 65.0% | #81 | 1,914 | 0 | 5 |
| 1997 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #16 | 1,998 | 0 | 7 |
| 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 42–17 | 71.2% | #7 | 1,914 | 0 | 8 |
| 1999 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #63 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #55 | 1,887 | 0 | 8 |
| 2000 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #64 | 1,722 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #57 | 1,823 | 0 | 8 |
| 2001 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #152 | 1,575 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #47 | 1,788 | 0 | 8 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #68 | 1,828 | 0 | 8 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #145 | 1,684 | 0 | 8 |