H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Slava Dosedel vs Tomas Carbonell H2H: 2-3

Tomas Carbonell holds a 3–2 lead over Slava Dosedel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on clay, while Tomas Carbonell leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tomas Carbonell won the 1996 Marseille round of 16 6-1 5-7 7-6(6).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Slava Dosedel
CZE Age 56 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Tomas Carbonell
ESP Age 58 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tomas Carbonell #77 6-1 5-7 7-6(6) Slava Dosedel #65 Match data Feb 16, 1996* R16 Marseille World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Slava Dosedel #31 3-6 7-5 7-6(3) Tomas Carbonell #62 Match data Jul 29, 1994* R16 Dutch Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Tomas Carbonell #66 1-6 6-4 6-1 Slava Dosedel #32 Match data Jun 18, 1994* SF St. Poelten ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Tomas Carbonell #84 6-3 6-1 Slava Dosedel #68 Match data Mar 17, 1994* R32 Casablanca ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Slava Dosedel #283 6-1 4-2 (ret.) Tomas Carbonell #72 Match data May 22, 1992* R16 Bologna ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Slava Dosedel #1,027 #26 1,122 1,826 190 185 50.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Tomas Carbonell #860 #40 900 1,777 193 222 46.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Slava Dosedel Tomas Carbonell
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1986 1–3 25.0% #404 1,480 0 0
18 1989 0–2 0.0% #265 1,468 0 0 1987 4–3 57.1% #242 1,559 0 0
19 1990 1–3 25.0% #146 1,467 0 0 1988 7–7 50.0% #209 1,573 0 0
20 1991 4–13 23.5% #201 1,444 0 0 1989 15–15 50.0% #77 1,624 0 0
21 1992 3–3 50.0% #159 1,497 0 0 1990 25–23 52.1% #76 1,709 0 0
22 1993 16–15 51.6% #68 1,608 0 0 1991 14–26 35.0% #96 1,624 0 0
23 1994 36–23 61.0% #29 1,733 0 0 1992 21–19 52.5% #65 1,659 0 1
24 1995 27–25 51.9% #60 1,696 0 1 1993 18–28 39.1% #89 1,581 0 1
25 1996 21–13 61.8% #66 1,768 0 2 1994 28–27 50.9% #62 1,640 0 1
26 1997 24–18 57.1% #43 1,763 0 3 1995 26–26 50.0% #74 1,679 0 1
27 1998 21–21 50.0% #64 1,690 0 3 1996 21–25 45.7% #75 1,584 0 2
28 1999 15–12 55.6% #63 1,740 0 3 1997 8–13 38.1% #170 1,576 0 2
29 2000 17–21 44.7% #64 1,704 0 3 1998 5–5 50.0% #167 1,618 0 2
30 2001 5–16 23.8% #152 1,568 0 3 1999 0–2 0.0% #826 1,580 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Slava Dosedel Tomas Carbonell
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1989 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1987 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — —
19 1990 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — —
20 1991 2 6 8 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 1989 0 2 2 0.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
21 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1990 7 5 12 58.3% 18 16 34 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1993 2 2 4 50.0% 14 12 26 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1991 9 11 20 45.0% 4 10 14 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
23 1994 — — — — 35 20 55 63.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1992 2 3 5 40.0% 19 13 32 59.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1995 — — — — 21 18 39 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1993 5 10 15 33.3% 13 15 28 46.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1996 1 1 2 50.0% 20 11 31 64.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 3 4 7 42.9% 21 17 38 55.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
26 1997 8 8 16 50.0% 16 7 23 69.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 21 19 40 52.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 5 8 37.5%
27 1998 5 8 13 38.5% 15 11 26 57.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1996 3 5 8 37.5% 14 14 28 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9%
28 1999 8 6 14 57.1% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1997 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
29 2000 11 12 23 47.8% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
30 2001 1 7 8 12.5% 3 7 10 30.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 38 51 89 42.7% 141 110 251 56.2% 5 10 15 33.3% 6 14 20 30.0% — 31 49 80 38.8% 141 133 274 51.5% 5 10 15 33.3% 16 30 46 34.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 320/369 of Slava Dosedel's and 283/312 of Tomas Carbonell's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Slava Dosedel Tomas Carbonell
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 1991 14/17 4.0 5.3 48.4% 67.2% 50.9% 45.0% 32.3% 58.2% 34.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1992 5/6 1.8 2.2 73.6% 55.7% 58.2% 50.3% 42.2% 54.9% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1993 28/31 2.4 2.5 65.2% 60.9% 47.1% 47.5% 46.3% 56.1% 43.4% 1991 37/40 2.4 2.3 65.9% 62.7% 47.5% 45.4% 50.6% 57.7% 39.2%
23 1994 54/59 1.9 2.7 68.8% 63.7% 48.8% 52.1% 49.4% 57.9% 44.8% 1992 35/40 1.6 5.2 69.1% 63.1% 38.6% 51.2% 47.0% 55.5% 43.3%
24 1995 45/52 2.9 2.4 65.2% 65.6% 50.0% 56.9% 47.0% 59.5% 41.4% 1993 40/46 2.1 5.1 68.3% 63.7% 44.2% 56.1% 43.8% 57.4% 42.4%
25 1996 29/34 2.0 1.4 68.4% 65.5% 51.1% 57.7% 43.7% 60.2% 45.0% 1994 50/55 2.0 4.4 70.1% 63.6% 44.7% 52.9% 47.6% 58.0% 42.8%
26 1997 35/42 3.2 2.4 66.1% 65.9% 52.9% 52.4% 43.1% 61.3% 41.8% 1995 47/52 3.5 3.5 64.2% 66.0% 46.7% 50.6% 43.9% 58.7% 41.6%
27 1998 38/42 3.3 2.7 61.6% 66.7% 48.4% 58.9% 42.4% 59.6% 41.6% 1996 44/46 3.6 3.1 65.8% 65.9% 47.9% 55.4% 46.3% 59.2% 38.4%
28 1999 21/27 3.9 2.4 66.9% 66.1% 50.4% 61.8% 41.9% 60.8% 41.7% 1997 19/21 3.8 4.0 65.4% 66.2% 44.8% 47.9% 57.5% 59.0% 42.0%
29 2000 32/38 1.8 2.3 69.3% 65.2% 52.2% 59.5% 42.1% 60.7% 41.0% 1998 10/10 4.2 3.9 62.4% 66.0% 45.4% 55.0% 38.8% 58.0% 40.4%
30 2001 19/21 2.0 3.8 63.4% 60.5% 43.2% 54.7% 47.2% 54.3% 37.6% 1999 1/2 0.0 4.0 77.3% 51.7% 47.1% 50.0% 50.0% 50.7% 33.3%
Career — 320/375 2.6 2.6 65.6% 64.6% 49.8% 54.9% 44.5% 59.0% 42.0% — 283/415 2.7 3.9 67.0% 64.4% 45.1% 51.9% 46.9% 57.9% 41.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Slava Dosedel Tomas Carbonell
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1481 99.8 — — — — — +28 — 36.4% -0.91 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.40
18 1989 1469 96.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–2 — — +0.32 1987 1559 121.2 — — — — — +30 — 47.4% -0.89 2–0 1–0 — -0.21
19 1990 1467 113.7 — — — — — +37 — 33.3% -0.89 0–1 1–0 — -0.06 1988 1574 120.3 — — — — — +79 — 50.0% 0.00 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.60
20 1991 1445 114.9 -2.50 -2.28 0.827 46.2% +54 +61 — 31.1% -0.98 2–4 (33%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.74 1989 1624 135.5 — — — — -172 +101 -3 50.0% +0.04 3–6 (33%) 4–5 (44%) — +0.46
21 1992 1497 106.4 -0.76 -0.97 0.911 48.6% — +42 — 33.3% -1.42 1–0 0–1 — -0.15 1990 1709 141.7 — — — — -128 +42 — 52.7% +0.34 4–5 (44%) 7–6 (54%) — -0.63
22 1993 1608 124.0 -3.61 +2.59 0.988 49.7% -110 +72 — 52.8% +0.04 3–2 (60%) 3–2 (60%) — +2.06 1991 1624 131.0 -2.01 +0.62 0.927 48.4% -30 +35 — 40.2% -0.52 4–9 (31%) 4–11 (27%) — -2.85
23 1994 1734 143.4 -1.39 +4.58 1.062 51.3% — +97 — 56.7% +0.38 13–5 (72%) 8–7 (53%) — +0.20 1992 1660 134.9 -4.31 +2.88 0.973 49.4% -103 +102 — 45.7% -0.28 12–3 (80%) 4–5 (44%) — +0.61
24 1995 1697 126.8 -1.34 +1.49 1.022 50.5% -185 +56 — 52.0% +0.22 7–9 (44%) 8–5 (62%) — +2.45 1993 1582 138.9 -2.57 +2.91 0.995 49.8% -40 +125 — 43.7% -0.34 7–12 (37%) 5–6 (45%) — -1.48
25 1996 1769 147.2 -0.26 +4.43 1.131 52.5% -253 +59 — 61.8% +0.87 4–5 (44%) 5–9 (36%) — -1.58 1994 1640 136.7 -2.35 +2.94 1.018 50.4% -88 +89 — 52.6% +0.08 11–12 (48%) 8–7 (53%) — +0.63
26 1997 1763 139.2 -0.53 +2.85 1.080 51.3% -158 +141 — 51.8% +0.17 11–6 (65%) 13–6 (68%) — -0.78 1995 1679 133.7 -1.80 +2.24 1.008 50.0% -117 +39 -53 47.0% -0.10 14–6 (70%) 5–9 (36%) — -0.06
27 1998 1690 137.3 -1.23 +2.78 1.030 50.6% -78 +130 -150 47.5% -0.19 5–6 (45%) 10–11 (48%) — -1.69 1996 1584 131.9 -1.67 -0.34 0.941 48.7% -22 +61 +63 43.9% -0.49 11–5 (69%) 9–8 (53%) — -0.23
28 1999 1741 128.9 +0.19 +2.72 1.065 50.9% -31 +30 — 59.5% +0.30 2–7 (22%) 7–4 (64%) — +1.11 1997 1576 125.5 -1.64 +1.61 1.024 50.3% -5 +73 — 45.3% +0.02 2–7 (22%) 5–2 (71%) — +0.37
29 2000 1705 136.5 -0.65 +3.11 1.046 50.6% -5 +2 — 49.0% +0.08 2–8 (20%) 6–6 (50%) — -1.55 1998 1619 127.2 -1.06 +0.30 0.963 49.4% -14 +45 — 48.3% -0.04 5–4 (56%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.26
30 2001 1569 123.5 -4.55 -0.10 0.823 46.3% +38 +58 — 29.8% -1.35 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) — -0.94 1999 1580 98.3 +1.26 -0.69 0.676 43.7% — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — +0.25
Career — 1826 140.0 -1.41 +2.62 1.023 50.4% -61 +78 -150 50.4% +0.02 52–58 (47%) 64–60 (52%) 99.6 +0.03 — 1777 140.3 -2.28 +1.80 0.981 49.6% -61 +72 +2 46.9% -0.17 78–74 (51%) 55–65 (46%) 101.9 -0.58

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.