H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Stan Wawrinka vs David Ferrer H2H: 7-6
Stan Wawrinka holds a 7–6 lead over David Ferrer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 13 main-draw meetings, David Ferrer leads 4–3 on clay, while Stan Wawrinka leads 3–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Stan Wawrinka won the 2015 Tour Finals round-robin match 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Switzerland
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
7
–
6
13 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 44
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2015 | Tour Finals | ATP Finals | RR | Hard | Stan Wawrinka | 7-5 6-2 | David Ferrer | Match data |
| Apr 19, 2014* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | SF | Clay | Stan Wawrinka | 6-1 7-6(3) | David Ferrer | Match data |
| Nov 4, 2013 | Tour Finals | ATP Finals | RR | Hard | Stan Wawrinka | 6-7(3) 6-4 6-1 | David Ferrer | Match data |
| May 5, 2013* | Estoril | ATP 250 | F | Clay | Stan Wawrinka | 6-1 6-4 | David Ferrer | Match data |
| Feb 24, 2013* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | F | Clay | David Ferrer | 6-4 3-6 6-1 | Stan Wawrinka | Match data |
| Nov 2, 2012* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | David Ferrer | 6-2 4-6 6-2 | Stan Wawrinka | Match data |
| Aug 15, 2012* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Stan Wawrinka | 6-4 6-1 | David Ferrer | Match data |
| Aug 18, 2009* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | David Ferrer | 7-5 6-2 | Stan Wawrinka | Match data |
| May 3, 2008* | Barcelona | ATP 500 | SF | Clay | David Ferrer | 7-6(8) 6-3 | Stan Wawrinka | Match data |
| Jul 21, 2006* | Stuttgart | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | David Ferrer | 6-3 6-4 | Stan Wawrinka | Match data |
| Apr 28, 2006* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Stan Wawrinka | 2-6 6-2 6-1 | David Ferrer | Match data |
| Feb 2, 2006* | Zagreb | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Stan Wawrinka | 4-6 6-1 6-3 | David Ferrer | Match data |
| Sep 16, 2004* | Bucharest | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | David Ferrer | 6-4 7-6(4) | Stan Wawrinka | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stan Wawrinka | #117 | #3 | 6,865 | 2,268 | 564 | 371 | 60.3% | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 16 |
| David Ferrer | #224 | #3 | 7,220 | 2,270 | 700 | 368 | 65.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 19 | 27 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Stan Wawrinka | David Ferrer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2003 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #171 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2004 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,421 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2005 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #59 | 1,610 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2006 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #30 | 1,867 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #71 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2007 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #36 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 29–31 | 48.3% | #49 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2008 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #13 | 1,860 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 41–28 | 59.4% | #14 | 1,776 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2009 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #21 | 1,875 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #14 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2010 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #21 | 1,991 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 57–22 | 72.2% | #5 | 2,036 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2011 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #17 | 1,915 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,856 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 2012 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #17 | 2,018 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #17 | 1,853 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 2013 | 49–23 | 68.1% | #8 | 2,113 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 58–23 | 71.6% | #7 | 2,033 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 2014 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #4 | 2,071 | 1 | 7 | 2011 | 55–19 | 74.3% | #5 | 2,108 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | 2015 | 54–19 | 74.0% | #4 | 2,199 | 2 | 11 | 2012 | 68–14 | 82.9% | #5 | 2,241 | 0 | 18 |
| 31 | 2016 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #4 | 2,129 | 3 | 15 | 2013 | 63–24 | 72.4% | #3 | 2,100 | 0 | 20 |
| 32 | 2017 | 26–11 | 70.3% | #9 | 2,120 | 3 | 16 | 2014 | 55–24 | 69.6% | #10 | 2,065 | 0 | 21 |
| 33 | 2018 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,946 | 3 | 16 | 2015 | 53–16 | 76.8% | #7 | 2,126 | 0 | 26 |
| 34 | 2019 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #16 | 2,021 | 3 | 16 | 2016 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,966 | 0 | 26 |
| 35 | 2020 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #18 | 2,001 | 3 | 16 | 2017 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #37 | 1,914 | 0 | 27 |
| 36 | 2021 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,916 | 3 | 16 | 2018 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #125 | 1,710 | 0 | 27 |
| 37 | 2022 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #148 | 1,824 | 3 | 16 | 2019 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #224 | 1,804 | 0 | 27 |
| 38 | 2023 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #49 | 1,782 | 3 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2024 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #161 | 1,714 | 3 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 2025 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #157 | 1,640 | 3 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 41 | 2026 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #117 | 1,632 | 3 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |