H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Stan Wawrinka vs Fernando Gonzalez H2H: 0-5

Fernando Gonzalez holds a 5–0 lead over Stan Wawrinka in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Fernando Gonzalez leads 2–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fernando Gonzalez won the 2008 Roland Garros third round 5-7 2-6 6-4 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Stan Wawrinka
Switzerland Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 5
5 main draw meetings
Fernando Gonzalez
CHI Age 45 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 31, 2008* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Fernando Gonzalez #25 5-7 2-6 6-4 6-4 6-4 Stan Wawrinka #10 Match data
Oct 28, 2006* Basel ATP 250 SF Carpet Fernando Gonzalez #7 6-4 6-4 Stan Wawrinka #40 Match data
Aug 19, 2006* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Fernando Gonzalez #13 7-6(2) 7-5 Stan Wawrinka #54 Match data
May 10, 2006* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Fernando Gonzalez #9 6-4 6-4 Stan Wawrinka #58 Match data
Mar 22, 2006* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Fernando Gonzalez #19 3-6 6-2 7-6(1) Stan Wawrinka #58 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Stan Wawrinka #117 #3 6,865 2,268 564 371 60.3% 3 1 0 3 9 16
Fernando Gonzalez #569 #5 3,285 2,088 330 192 63.2% 0 0 0 1 10 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Stan Wawrinka Fernando Gonzalez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2003 2–4 33.3% #171 1,483 0 0 1999 1–1 50.0% #412 1,510 0 0
19 2004 0–6 0.0% #168 1,421 0 0 2000 8–5 61.5% #115 1,622 0 1
20 2005 14–14 50.0% #54 1,632 0 0 2001 5–10 33.3% #139 1,523 0 1
21 2006 31–23 57.4% #30 1,867 0 1 2002 40–21 65.6% #18 1,863 0 3
22 2007 21–22 48.8% #36 1,865 0 1 2003 31–25 55.4% #35 1,733 0 3
23 2008 33–20 62.3% #13 1,860 0 1 2004 29–20 59.2% #23 1,728 0 4
24 2009 29–19 60.4% #21 1,875 0 1 2005 46–21 68.7% #11 1,890 0 7
25 2010 35–17 67.3% #21 1,991 0 2 2006 47–20 70.1% #10 1,982 0 7
26 2011 33–19 63.5% #17 1,915 0 3 2007 33–21 61.1% #7 1,868 0 8
27 2012 34–18 65.4% #17 2,018 0 3 2008 32–15 68.1% #15 1,863 0 10
28 2013 49–23 68.1% #8 2,113 0 4 2009 39–16 70.9% #11 1,988 0 11
29 2014 38–16 70.4% #4 2,071 1 7 2010 13–9 59.1% #68 1,847 0 11
30 2015 54–19 74.0% #4 2,199 2 11 2011 3–4 42.9% #298 1,808 0 11
31 2016 46–18 71.9% #4 2,129 3 15 2012 3–4 42.9% #509 1,780 0 11
32 2017 26–11 70.3% #9 2,120 3 16 — — — — — — —
33 2018 17–17 50.0% #66 1,946 3 16 — — — — — — —
34 2019 33–20 62.3% #16 2,021 3 16 — — — — — — —
35 2020 15–8 65.2% #18 2,001 3 16 — — — — — — —
36 2021 3–4 42.9% #82 1,916 3 16 — — — — — — —
37 2022 8–14 36.4% #148 1,824 3 16 — — — — — — —
38 2023 24–20 54.5% #49 1,782 3 16 — — — — — — —
39 2024 9–16 36.0% #161 1,714 3 16 — — — — — — —
40 2025 4–13 23.5% #157 1,640 3 16 — — — — — — —
41 2026 6–10 37.5% #117 1,632 3 16 — — — — — — —