H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Stan Wawrinka vs Ivan Ljubicic H2H: 3-3

Stan Wawrinka and Ivan Ljubicic are tied 3–3 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Stan Wawrinka leads 3–2 on hard courts, while Ivan Ljubicic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Stan Wawrinka won the 2010 Paris Masters third round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Stan Wawrinka
Switzerland Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Ivan Ljubicic
CRO Age 47 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 10, 2010* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Stan Wawrinka #22 6-4 6-4 Ivan Ljubicic #17 Match data
Nov 5, 2009* Basel ATP 500 R32 Hard Stan Wawrinka #21 6-7(5) 6-3 6-4 Ivan Ljubicic #25 Match data
Jan 5, 2008* Doha ATP 250 SF Hard Stan Wawrinka #36 7-6(1) 6-4 Ivan Ljubicic #18 Match data
May 31, 2007* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Ivan Ljubicic #7 6-4 6-3 6-7(3) 6-3 Stan Wawrinka #44 Match data
Oct 14, 2006* Vienna ATP 250 QF Hard Ivan Ljubicic #3 6-3 6-2 Stan Wawrinka #44 Match data
Jan 6, 2005* Doha ATP 250 R32 Hard Ivan Ljubicic #22 6-3 6-4 Stan Wawrinka #168 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Stan Wawrinka #117 #3 6,865 2,268 564 371 60.3% 3 1 0 3 9 16
Ivan Ljubicic #53 #3 3,315 2,052 400 282 58.7% 0 1 0 0 9 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Stan Wawrinka Ivan Ljubicic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1996 1–1 50.0% #576 1,509 0 0
18 2003 2–4 33.3% #171 1,483 0 0 1997 1–4 20.0% #289 1,489 0 0
19 2004 0–6 0.0% #168 1,421 0 0 1998 0–1 0.0% #293 1,482 0 0
20 2005 14–14 50.0% #54 1,632 0 0 1999 11–12 47.8% #77 1,587 0 0
21 2006 31–23 57.4% #30 1,867 0 1 2000 19–21 47.5% #91 1,654 0 0
22 2007 21–22 48.8% #36 1,865 0 1 2001 27–21 56.2% #37 1,824 0 1
23 2008 33–20 62.3% #13 1,860 0 1 2002 27–27 50.0% #49 1,741 0 1
24 2009 29–19 60.4% #21 1,875 0 1 2003 27–23 54.0% #42 1,791 0 1
25 2010 35–17 67.3% #21 1,991 0 2 2004 33–22 60.0% #22 1,809 0 1
26 2011 33–19 63.5% #17 1,915 0 3 2005 50–23 68.5% #9 1,951 0 3
27 2012 34–18 65.4% #17 2,018 0 3 2006 55–19 74.3% #5 1,944 0 6
28 2013 49–23 68.1% #8 2,113 0 4 2007 43–22 66.2% #18 1,807 0 8
29 2014 38–16 70.4% #4 2,071 1 7 2008 20–19 51.3% #44 1,724 0 8
30 2015 54–19 74.0% #4 2,199 2 11 2009 32–23 58.2% #24 1,894 0 9
31 2016 46–18 71.9% #4 2,129 3 15 2010 26–19 57.8% #17 1,884 0 10
32 2017 26–11 70.3% #9 2,120 3 16 2011 25–19 56.8% #30 1,909 0 10
33 2018 17–17 50.0% #66 1,946 3 16 2012 3–6 33.3% #53 1,794 0 10
34 2019 33–20 62.3% #16 2,021 3 16 — — — — — — —
35 2020 15–8 65.2% #18 2,001 3 16 — — — — — — —
36 2021 3–4 42.9% #82 1,916 3 16 — — — — — — —
37 2022 8–14 36.4% #148 1,824 3 16 — — — — — — —
38 2023 24–20 54.5% #49 1,782 3 16 — — — — — — —
39 2024 9–16 36.0% #161 1,714 3 16 — — — — — — —
40 2025 4–13 23.5% #157 1,640 3 16 — — — — — — —
41 2026 6–10 37.5% #117 1,632 3 16 — — — — — — —