H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Stan Wawrinka vs John Isner H2H: 2-3

John Isner holds a 3–2 lead over Stan Wawrinka in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Stan Wawrinka leads 2–1 on hard courts, while John Isner leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Stan Wawrinka won the 2020 Australian Open third round 6-4 4-1 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Stan Wawrinka
Switzerland Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
John Isner
USA Age 41 Right-Handed 208 cm / 6'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 26, 2020* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Stan Wawrinka #15 6-4 4-1 (ret.) John Isner #19 Match data
May 19, 2017* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay John Isner #24 7-6(1) 6-4 Stan Wawrinka #3 Match data
Nov 9, 2011* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard John Isner #25 6-7(3) 7-5 7-6(5) Stan Wawrinka #16 Match data
May 8, 2010* Belgrade ATP 250 SF Clay John Isner #21 7-5 7-5 Stan Wawrinka #23 Match data
Oct 8, 2009* Tokyo ATP 500 R32 Hard Stan Wawrinka #23 6-4 6-4 John Isner #43 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Stan Wawrinka #117 #3 6,865 2,268 564 371 60.3% 3 1 0 3 9 16
John Isner #660 #8 3,720 2,053 467 293 61.4% 0 1 0 0 15 16

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Stan Wawrinka John Isner
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2003 2–4 33.3% #171 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2004 0–6 0.0% #168 1,421 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2005 14–14 50.0% #54 1,632 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2006 31–23 57.4% #30 1,867 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 2007 21–22 48.8% #36 1,865 0 1 2007 8–5 61.5% #106 1,656 0 0
23 2008 33–20 62.3% #13 1,860 0 1 2008 11–19 36.7% #144 1,608 0 0
24 2009 29–19 60.4% #21 1,875 0 1 2009 27–18 60.0% #34 1,828 0 0
25 2010 35–17 67.3% #21 1,991 0 2 2010 38–20 65.5% #19 1,882 0 1
26 2011 33–19 63.5% #17 1,915 0 3 2011 34–19 64.2% #18 2,021 0 3
27 2012 34–18 65.4% #17 2,018 0 3 2012 38–18 67.9% #14 1,965 0 5
28 2013 49–23 68.1% #8 2,113 0 4 2013 38–22 63.3% #14 1,983 0 7
29 2014 38–16 70.4% #4 2,071 1 7 2014 37–21 63.8% #19 1,922 0 9
30 2015 54–19 74.0% #4 2,199 2 11 2015 45–23 66.2% #11 2,026 0 10
31 2016 46–18 71.9% #4 2,129 3 15 2016 30–20 60.0% #19 2,019 0 10
32 2017 26–11 70.3% #9 2,120 3 16 2017 36–21 63.2% #17 1,984 0 12
33 2018 17–17 50.0% #66 1,946 3 16 2018 32–22 59.3% #10 1,956 0 14
34 2019 33–20 62.3% #16 2,021 3 16 2019 29–17 63.0% #19 1,921 0 15
35 2020 15–8 65.2% #18 2,001 3 16 2020 10–7 58.8% #25 1,845 0 15
36 2021 3–4 42.9% #82 1,916 3 16 2021 23–11 67.6% #24 1,933 0 16
37 2022 8–14 36.4% #148 1,824 3 16 2022 22–16 57.9% #41 1,891 0 16
38 2023 24–20 54.5% #49 1,782 3 16 2023 9–14 39.1% #172 1,698 0 16
39 2024 9–16 36.0% #161 1,714 3 16 — — — — — — —
40 2025 4–13 23.5% #157 1,640 3 16 — — — — — — —
41 2026 6–10 37.5% #117 1,632 3 16 — — — — — — —