H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Stan Wawrinka vs Juan Monaco H2H: 4-1

Stan Wawrinka holds a 4–1 lead over Juan Monaco in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Stan Wawrinka leads 3–1 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Juan Monaco won the 2016 Rome Masters fourth round 6-7(5) 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Stan Wawrinka
Switzerland Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Juan Monaco
ARG Age 42 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 13, 2016* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Juan Monaco #114 6-7(5) 6-3 6-4 Stan Wawrinka #4 Match data
May 13, 2015* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Stan Wawrinka #9 4-6 6-3 6-2 Juan Monaco #36 Match data
Apr 15, 2015* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Stan Wawrinka #9 6-1 6-4 Juan Monaco #42 Match data
Oct 11, 2011* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Stan Wawrinka #19 3-6 6-3 6-3 Juan Monaco #27 Match data
Feb 19, 2011* Buenos Aires ATP 250 QF Clay Stan Wawrinka #15 7-5 6-3 Juan Monaco #30 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Stan Wawrinka #117 #3 6,865 2,268 564 371 60.3% 3 1 0 3 9 16
Juan Monaco #226 #10 2,775 2,046 319 256 55.5% 0 0 0 1 7 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Stan Wawrinka Juan Monaco
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2003 2–4 33.3% #171 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2004 0–6 0.0% #168 1,421 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2005 14–14 50.0% #54 1,632 0 0 2004 16–12 57.1% #73 1,661 0 0
21 2006 31–23 57.4% #30 1,867 0 1 2005 18–25 41.9% #85 1,587 0 0
22 2007 21–22 48.8% #36 1,865 0 1 2006 18–23 43.9% #69 1,641 0 0
23 2008 33–20 62.3% #13 1,860 0 1 2007 41–19 68.3% #23 1,864 0 3
24 2009 29–19 60.4% #21 1,875 0 1 2008 27–20 57.4% #46 1,768 0 3
25 2010 35–17 67.3% #21 1,991 0 2 2009 34–24 58.6% #30 1,850 0 3
26 2011 33–19 63.5% #17 1,915 0 3 2010 28–18 60.9% #26 1,838 0 3
27 2012 34–18 65.4% #17 2,018 0 3 2011 26–24 52.0% #26 1,932 0 3
28 2013 49–23 68.1% #8 2,113 0 4 2012 36–17 67.9% #12 1,944 0 7
29 2014 38–16 70.4% #4 2,071 1 7 2013 18–21 46.2% #42 1,809 0 7
30 2015 54–19 74.0% #4 2,199 2 11 2014 20–18 52.6% #62 1,856 0 7
31 2016 46–18 71.9% #4 2,129 3 15 2015 21–19 52.5% #53 1,811 0 7
32 2017 26–11 70.3% #9 2,120 3 16 2016 16–13 55.2% #65 1,864 0 8
33 2018 17–17 50.0% #66 1,946 3 16 2017 0–3 0.0% #226 1,805 0 8
34 2019 33–20 62.3% #16 2,021 3 16 — — — — — — —
35 2020 15–8 65.2% #18 2,001 3 16 — — — — — — —
36 2021 3–4 42.9% #82 1,916 3 16 — — — — — — —
37 2022 8–14 36.4% #148 1,824 3 16 — — — — — — —
38 2023 24–20 54.5% #49 1,782 3 16 — — — — — — —
39 2024 9–16 36.0% #161 1,714 3 16 — — — — — — —
40 2025 4–13 23.5% #157 1,640 3 16 — — — — — — —
41 2026 6–10 37.5% #117 1,632 3 16 — — — — — — —