H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC

Stan Wawrinka vs Lleyton Hewitt H2H: 1-2

Lleyton Hewitt holds a 2–1 lead over Stan Wawrinka in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Lleyton Hewitt leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lleyton Hewitt won the 2013 Wimbledon first round 6-4 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Stan Wawrinka
Switzerland Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Lleyton Hewitt
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 26, 2013* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Lleyton Hewitt #70 6-4 7-5 6-3 Stan Wawrinka #10 Match data
Mar 12, 2013* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Stan Wawrinka #18 6-4 7-5 Lleyton Hewitt #98 Match data
Aug 15, 2007* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #20 7-5 3-6 7-6(5) Stan Wawrinka #49 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Stan Wawrinka #117 #3 6,865 2,268 564 371 60.3% 3 1 0 3 9 16
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,159 564 241 70.1% 2 2 2 1 23 30

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Stan Wawrinka Lleyton Hewitt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1997 0–1 0.0% #550 1,492 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,614 0 1
18 2003 2–4 33.3% #171 1,483 0 0 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,853 0 2
19 2004 0–6 0.0% #168 1,421 0 0 2000 53–15 77.9% #7 1,993 0 6
20 2005 14–14 50.0% #54 1,632 0 0 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12
21 2006 31–23 57.4% #30 1,867 0 1 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,062 2 17
22 2007 21–22 48.8% #36 1,865 0 1 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19
23 2008 33–20 62.3% #13 1,860 0 1 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,076 2 23
24 2009 29–19 60.4% #21 1,875 0 1 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,092 2 24
25 2010 35–17 67.3% #21 1,991 0 2 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,964 2 25
26 2011 33–19 63.5% #17 1,915 0 3 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,925 2 26
27 2012 34–18 65.4% #17 2,018 0 3 2008 17–10 63.0% #67 1,936 2 26
28 2013 49–23 68.1% #8 2,113 0 4 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,956 2 27
29 2014 38–16 70.4% #4 2,071 1 7 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,907 2 28
30 2015 54–19 74.0% #4 2,199 2 11 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,817 2 28
31 2016 46–18 71.9% #4 2,129 3 15 2012 13–11 54.2% #83 1,867 2 28
32 2017 26–11 70.3% #9 2,120 3 16 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,884 2 28
33 2018 17–17 50.0% #66 1,946 3 16 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30
34 2019 33–20 62.3% #16 2,021 3 16 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,715 2 30
35 2020 15–8 65.2% #18 2,001 3 16 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30
36 2021 3–4 42.9% #82 1,916 3 16 — — — — — — —
37 2022 8–14 36.4% #148 1,824 3 16 — — — — — — —
38 2023 24–20 54.5% #49 1,782 3 16 — — — — — — —
39 2024 9–16 36.0% #161 1,714 3 16 — — — — — — —
40 2025 4–13 23.5% #157 1,640 3 16 — — — — — — —
41 2026 6–10 37.5% #117 1,632 3 16 — — — — — — —