H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Stan Wawrinka vs Lukas Rosol H2H: 5-0

Stan Wawrinka holds a 5–0 lead over Lukas Rosol in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Stan Wawrinka leads 3–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Stan Wawrinka won the 2016 St. Petersburg fourth round 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Stan Wawrinka
Switzerland Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
5 – 0
5 main draw meetings
Lukas Rosol
CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 23, 2016* St. Petersburg ATP 250 R16 Hard Stan Wawrinka #3 6-3 6-1 Lukas Rosol #85 Match data
May 24, 2016* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Stan Wawrinka #4 4-6 6-1 3-6 6-3 6-4 Lukas Rosol #59 Match data
May 20, 2016* Geneva ATP 250 SF Clay Stan Wawrinka #4 6-2 4-6 6-3 Lukas Rosol #68 Match data
Jan 24, 2016* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Stan Wawrinka #4 6-2 6-3 7-6(3) Lukas Rosol #51 Match data
May 22, 2015* Geneva ATP 250 R16 Clay Stan Wawrinka #9 6-4 3-6 6-3 Lukas Rosol #40 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Stan Wawrinka #117 #3 6,865 2,268 564 371 60.3% 3 1 0 3 9 16
Lukas Rosol #1,777 #26 1,290 1,921 110 148 42.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Stan Wawrinka Lukas Rosol
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2003 2–4 33.3% #171 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2004 0–6 0.0% #168 1,421 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2005 14–14 50.0% #54 1,632 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2006 31–23 57.4% #30 1,867 0 1 2007 0–1 0.0% #271 1,507 0 0
22 2007 21–22 48.8% #36 1,865 0 1 2008 1–2 33.3% #182 1,535 0 0
23 2008 33–20 62.3% #13 1,860 0 1 2009 0–1 0.0% #148 1,562 0 0
24 2009 29–19 60.4% #21 1,875 0 1 2010 0–2 0.0% #164 1,575 0 0
25 2010 35–17 67.3% #21 1,991 0 2 2011 5–13 27.8% #70 1,576 0 0
26 2011 33–19 63.5% #17 1,915 0 3 2012 17–18 48.6% #73 1,748 0 0
27 2012 34–18 65.4% #17 2,018 0 3 2013 21–24 46.7% #47 1,742 0 1
28 2013 49–23 68.1% #8 2,113 0 4 2014 28–26 51.9% #31 1,798 0 2
29 2014 38–16 70.4% #4 2,071 1 7 2015 19–28 40.4% #55 1,846 0 2
30 2015 54–19 74.0% #4 2,199 2 11 2016 14–22 38.9% #113 1,726 0 2
31 2016 46–18 71.9% #4 2,129 3 15 2017 2–3 40.0% #203 1,671 0 2
32 2017 26–11 70.3% #9 2,120 3 16 2018 2–2 50.0% #142 1,703 0 2
33 2018 17–17 50.0% #66 1,946 3 16 2019 1–3 25.0% #180 1,660 0 2
34 2019 33–20 62.3% #16 2,021 3 16 2020 0–1 0.0% #199 1,658 0 2
35 2020 15–8 65.2% #18 2,001 3 16 — — — — — — —
36 2021 3–4 42.9% #82 1,916 3 16 2022 0–2 0.0% #216 1,588 0 2
37 2022 8–14 36.4% #148 1,824 3 16 — — — — — — —
38 2023 24–20 54.5% #49 1,782 3 16 — — — — — — —
39 2024 9–16 36.0% #161 1,714 3 16 — — — — — — —
40 2025 4–13 23.5% #157 1,640 3 16 — — — — — — —
41 2026 6–10 37.5% #117 1,632 3 16 — — — — — — —