H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Stan Wawrinka vs Lukasz Kubot H2H: 1-0
Stan Wawrinka holds a 1–0 lead over Lukasz Kubot in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Stan Wawrinka leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Stan Wawrinka won the 2009 Shanghai Masters second round 2-6 7-6(5) 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Switzerland
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2009* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Stan Wawrinka | 2-6 7-6(5) 7-6(3) | Lukasz Kubot | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stan Wawrinka | #117 | #3 | 6,865 | 2,268 | 564 | 371 | 60.3% | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 16 |
| Lukasz Kubot | #1,054 | #41 | 977 | 1,870 | 82 | 118 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Stan Wawrinka | Lukasz Kubot | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2003 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #171 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #219 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,421 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #125 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #30 | 1,867 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #36 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,730 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #13 | 1,860 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #21 | 1,875 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #21 | 1,991 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #74 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #17 | 1,915 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #72 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #17 | 2,018 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #170 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 49–23 | 68.1% | #8 | 2,113 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #471 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #4 | 2,071 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 54–19 | 74.0% | #4 | 2,199 | 2 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #4 | 2,129 | 3 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 26–11 | 70.3% | #9 | 2,120 | 3 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,946 | 3 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #16 | 2,021 | 3 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #18 | 2,001 | 3 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,916 | 3 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #148 | 1,824 | 3 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #49 | 1,782 | 3 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #161 | 1,714 | 3 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #157 | 1,640 | 3 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #117 | 1,632 | 3 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |