H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Stan Wawrinka vs Marcos Baghdatis H2H: 6-0

Stan Wawrinka holds a 6–0 lead over Marcos Baghdatis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Stan Wawrinka leads 5–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Stan Wawrinka won the 2016 Dubai final 6-4 7-6(13).

Switzerland Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
6 0
6 main draw meetings
CYP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 27, 2016* Dubai ATP 500 F Hard Stan Wawrinka #4 6-4 7-6(13) Marcos Baghdatis #57 Match data
Jun 12, 2014* Queen's Club ATP 500 R32 Grass Stan Wawrinka #3 3-2 (ret.) Marcos Baghdatis #118 Match data
Sep 27, 2013* Kuala Lumpur ATP 250 R16 Hard Stan Wawrinka #10 6-1 7-5 Marcos Baghdatis #48 Match data
Sep 1, 2013* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Stan Wawrinka #156 6-3 6-2 6-7(1) 7-6(7) Marcos Baghdatis #53 Match data
Jan 19, 2012* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Stan Wawrinka #22 7-6(3) 6-4 5-7 6-1 Marcos Baghdatis #44 Match data
Mar 18, 2008* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Stan Wawrinka #35 6-3 6-7(1) 6-0 Marcos Baghdatis #18 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Stan Wawrinka #117 #3 6,865 2,268 564 371 60.3% 3 1 0 3 9 16
Marcos Baghdatis #179 #8 2,111 1,952 324 272 54.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Stan Wawrinka Marcos Baghdatis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2003 2–4 33.3% #171 1,483 0 0
19 2004 0–6 0.0% #168 1,421 0 0 2004 1–1 50.0% #159 1,559 0 0
20 2005 14–14 50.0% #54 1,632 0 0 2005 11–12 47.8% #55 1,694 0 0
21 2006 31–23 57.4% #30 1,867 0 1 2006 33–20 62.3% #12 1,842 0 1
22 2007 21–22 48.8% #36 1,865 0 1 2007 44–22 66.7% #16 1,937 0 2
23 2008 33–20 62.3% #13 1,860 0 1 2008 12–12 50.0% #98 1,815 0 2
24 2009 29–19 60.4% #21 1,875 0 1 2009 18–16 52.9% #42 1,810 0 3
25 2010 35–17 67.3% #21 1,991 0 2 2010 41–27 60.3% #20 1,852 0 4
26 2011 33–19 63.5% #17 1,915 0 3 2011 26–27 49.1% #44 1,844 0 4
27 2012 34–18 65.4% #17 2,018 0 3 2012 31–24 56.4% #36 1,897 0 4
28 2013 49–23 68.1% #8 2,113 0 4 2013 14–22 38.9% #87 1,804 0 4
29 2014 38–16 70.4% #4 2,071 1 7 2014 7–11 38.9% #85 1,703 0 4
30 2015 54–19 74.0% #4 2,199 2 11 2015 26–19 57.8% #46 1,869 0 4
31 2016 46–18 71.9% #4 2,129 3 15 2016 26–23 53.1% #36 1,884 0 4
32 2017 26–11 70.3% #9 2,120 3 16 2017 18–16 52.9% #102 1,839 0 4
33 2018 17–17 50.0% #66 1,946 3 16 2018 12–17 41.4% #124 1,723 0 4
34 2019 33–20 62.3% #16 2,021 3 16 2019 4–3 57.1% #179 1,740 0 4
35 2020 15–8 65.2% #18 2,001 3 16
36 2021 3–4 42.9% #82 1,916 3 16
37 2022 8–14 36.4% #148 1,824 3 16
38 2023 24–20 54.5% #49 1,782 3 16
39 2024 9–16 36.0% #161 1,714 3 16
40 2025 4–13 23.5% #157 1,640 3 16
41 2026 6–10 37.5% #117 1,632 3 16