H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Stan Wawrinka vs Nicolas Almagro H2H: 6-3

Stan Wawrinka holds a 6–3 lead over Nicolas Almagro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Stan Wawrinka leads 3–2 on hard courts and 3–1 on clay. Most recently, Stan Wawrinka won the 2014 Monte Carlo Masters fourth round W/O.

Switzerland Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
6 3
9 main draw meetings
ESP Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 18, 2014* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Stan Wawrinka #3 (w/o) Nicolas Almagro #20 Match data
Nov 1, 2013* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Stan Wawrinka #8 6-3 6-2 Nicolas Almagro #13 Match data
Feb 23, 2013* Buenos Aires ATP 250 SF Clay Stan Wawrinka #17 6-3 7-5 Nicolas Almagro #11 Match data
Apr 20, 2012* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Stan Wawrinka #26 6-3 6-3 Nicolas Almagro #12 Match data
Feb 25, 2012* Buenos Aires ATP 250 SF Clay Nicolas Almagro #11 6-4 3-6 7-5 Stan Wawrinka #26 Match data
Jan 22, 2012* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Nicolas Almagro #10 7-6(2) 6-2 6-4 Stan Wawrinka #22 Match data
Aug 17, 2010* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Stan Wawrinka #26 6-3 6-3 Nicolas Almagro #16 Match data
Jan 11, 2007* Auckland ATP 250 R32 Hard Nicolas Almagro #32 1-6 6-4 6-1 Stan Wawrinka #31 Match data
Aug 23, 2006* New Haven ATP 250 R64 Hard Stan Wawrinka #47 6-3 6-7(5) 6-4 Nicolas Almagro #45 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Stan Wawrinka #117 #3 6,865 2,268 564 371 60.3% 3 1 0 3 9 16
Nicolas Almagro #846 #9 2,735 2,076 385 272 58.6% 0 0 0 2 11 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Stan Wawrinka Nicolas Almagro
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 1–1 50.0% #156 1,511 0 0
18 2003 2–4 33.3% #171 1,483 0 0 2004 2–7 22.2% #103 1,539 0 0
19 2004 0–6 0.0% #168 1,421 0 0 2005 13–22 37.1% #114 1,551 0 0
20 2005 14–14 50.0% #54 1,632 0 0 2006 27–20 57.4% #32 1,721 0 1
21 2006 31–23 57.4% #30 1,867 0 1 2007 32–27 54.2% #28 1,723 0 2
22 2007 21–22 48.8% #36 1,865 0 1 2008 34–16 68.0% #18 1,794 0 4
23 2008 33–20 62.3% #13 1,860 0 1 2009 30–24 55.6% #26 1,831 0 5
24 2009 29–19 60.4% #21 1,875 0 1 2010 41–23 64.1% #15 1,885 0 7
25 2010 35–17 67.3% #21 1,991 0 2 2011 47–23 67.1% #10 1,874 0 10
26 2011 33–19 63.5% #17 1,915 0 3 2012 51–21 70.8% #11 2,010 0 12
27 2012 34–18 65.4% #17 2,018 0 3 2013 42–23 64.6% #13 1,961 0 12
28 2013 49–23 68.1% #8 2,113 0 4 2014 15–10 60.0% #71 1,928 0 12
29 2014 38–16 70.4% #4 2,071 1 7 2015 18–20 47.4% #73 1,795 0 12
30 2015 54–19 74.0% #4 2,199 2 11 2016 22–22 50.0% #44 1,790 0 13
31 2016 46–18 71.9% #4 2,129 3 15 2017 10–12 45.5% #151 1,833 0 13
32 2017 26–11 70.3% #9 2,120 3 16 2018 0–1 0.0% #846 1,777 0 13
33 2018 17–17 50.0% #66 1,946 3 16
34 2019 33–20 62.3% #16 2,021 3 16
35 2020 15–8 65.2% #18 2,001 3 16
36 2021 3–4 42.9% #82 1,916 3 16
37 2022 8–14 36.4% #148 1,824 3 16
38 2023 24–20 54.5% #49 1,782 3 16
39 2024 9–16 36.0% #161 1,714 3 16
40 2025 4–13 23.5% #157 1,640 3 16
41 2026 6–10 37.5% #117 1,632 3 16