H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Stan Wawrinka vs Nicolas Almagro H2H: 6-3
Stan Wawrinka holds a 6–3 lead over Nicolas Almagro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Stan Wawrinka leads 3–2 on hard courts and 3–1 on clay. Most recently, Stan Wawrinka won the 2014 Monte Carlo Masters fourth round W/O.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Switzerland
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
6
–
3
9 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2014* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Stan Wawrinka | (w/o) | Nicolas Almagro | Match data |
| Nov 1, 2013* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Stan Wawrinka | 6-3 6-2 | Nicolas Almagro | Match data |
| Feb 23, 2013* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Stan Wawrinka | 6-3 7-5 | Nicolas Almagro | Match data |
| Apr 20, 2012* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Stan Wawrinka | 6-3 6-3 | Nicolas Almagro | Match data |
| Feb 25, 2012* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Nicolas Almagro | 6-4 3-6 7-5 | Stan Wawrinka | Match data |
| Jan 22, 2012* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Nicolas Almagro | 7-6(2) 6-2 6-4 | Stan Wawrinka | Match data |
| Aug 17, 2010* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Stan Wawrinka | 6-3 6-3 | Nicolas Almagro | Match data |
| Jan 11, 2007* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Nicolas Almagro | 1-6 6-4 6-1 | Stan Wawrinka | Match data |
| Aug 23, 2006* | New Haven | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Stan Wawrinka | 6-3 6-7(5) 6-4 | Nicolas Almagro | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stan Wawrinka | #117 | #3 | 6,865 | 2,268 | 564 | 371 | 60.3% | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 16 |
| Nicolas Almagro | #846 | #9 | 2,735 | 2,076 | 385 | 272 | 58.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 13 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Stan Wawrinka | Nicolas Almagro | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #156 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2003 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #171 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #103 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2004 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,421 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2005 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #32 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2006 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #30 | 1,867 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #28 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2007 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #36 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 34–16 | 68.0% | #18 | 1,794 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 2008 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #13 | 1,860 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #26 | 1,831 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2009 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #21 | 1,875 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #15 | 1,885 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 2010 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #21 | 1,991 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #10 | 1,874 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 2011 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #17 | 1,915 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 51–21 | 70.8% | #11 | 2,010 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | 2012 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #17 | 2,018 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #13 | 1,961 | 0 | 12 |
| 28 | 2013 | 49–23 | 68.1% | #8 | 2,113 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #71 | 1,928 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | 2014 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #4 | 2,071 | 1 | 7 | 2015 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #73 | 1,795 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | 2015 | 54–19 | 74.0% | #4 | 2,199 | 2 | 11 | 2016 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,790 | 0 | 13 |
| 31 | 2016 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #4 | 2,129 | 3 | 15 | 2017 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #151 | 1,833 | 0 | 13 |
| 32 | 2017 | 26–11 | 70.3% | #9 | 2,120 | 3 | 16 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #846 | 1,777 | 0 | 13 |
| 33 | 2018 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,946 | 3 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2019 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #16 | 2,021 | 3 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2020 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #18 | 2,001 | 3 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2021 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,916 | 3 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2022 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #148 | 1,824 | 3 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2023 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #49 | 1,782 | 3 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2024 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #161 | 1,714 | 3 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 2025 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #157 | 1,640 | 3 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 41 | 2026 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #117 | 1,632 | 3 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |