H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Stan Wawrinka vs Nicolas Kiefer H2H: 2-2

Stan Wawrinka and Nicolas Kiefer are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Stan Wawrinka leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Nicolas Kiefer leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Stan Wawrinka won the 2009 Canada Masters second round 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Stan Wawrinka
Switzerland Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Nicolas Kiefer
GER Age 49 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 12, 2009* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Stan Wawrinka #22 6-4 6-1 Nicolas Kiefer #110 Match data
May 14, 2008* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Nicolas Kiefer #41 7-5 7-5 Stan Wawrinka #10 Match data
Oct 30, 2007* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Stan Wawrinka #36 7-5 6-3 Nicolas Kiefer #50 Match data
Oct 17, 2007* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Nicolas Kiefer #112 7-5 6-3 Stan Wawrinka #35 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Stan Wawrinka #117 #3 6,865 2,268 564 371 60.3% 3 1 0 3 9 16
Nicolas Kiefer #720 #4 2,447 1,984 343 252 57.6% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Stan Wawrinka Nicolas Kiefer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% #1198 1,489 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1995 3–3 50.0% #206 1,527 0 0
18 2003 2–4 33.3% #171 1,483 0 0 1996 7–9 43.8% #128 1,562 0 0
19 2004 0–6 0.0% #168 1,421 0 0 1997 26–16 61.9% #32 1,798 0 1
20 2005 14–14 50.0% #54 1,632 0 0 1998 31–25 55.4% #35 1,790 0 1
21 2006 31–23 57.4% #30 1,867 0 1 1999 53–21 71.6% #6 1,921 0 4
22 2007 21–22 48.8% #36 1,865 0 1 2000 30–15 66.7% #20 1,921 0 6
23 2008 33–20 62.3% #13 1,860 0 1 2001 26–25 51.0% #42 1,766 0 6
24 2009 29–19 60.4% #21 1,875 0 1 2002 19–24 44.2% #72 1,718 0 6
25 2010 35–17 67.3% #21 1,991 0 2 2003 19–17 52.8% #58 1,727 0 6
26 2011 33–19 63.5% #17 1,915 0 3 2004 32–19 62.7% #21 1,897 0 6
27 2012 34–18 65.4% #17 2,018 0 3 2005 31–22 58.5% #22 1,854 0 6
28 2013 49–23 68.1% #8 2,113 0 4 2006 14–8 63.6% #48 1,843 0 6
29 2014 38–16 70.4% #4 2,071 1 7 2007 19–12 61.3% #49 1,893 0 6
30 2015 54–19 74.0% #4 2,199 2 11 2008 20–16 55.6% #38 1,876 0 6
31 2016 46–18 71.9% #4 2,129 3 15 2009 12–16 42.9% #116 1,757 0 6
32 2017 26–11 70.3% #9 2,120 3 16 2010 1–3 25.0% #722 1,717 0 6
33 2018 17–17 50.0% #66 1,946 3 16 — — — — — — —
34 2019 33–20 62.3% #16 2,021 3 16 — — — — — — —
35 2020 15–8 65.2% #18 2,001 3 16 — — — — — — —
36 2021 3–4 42.9% #82 1,916 3 16 — — — — — — —
37 2022 8–14 36.4% #148 1,824 3 16 — — — — — — —
38 2023 24–20 54.5% #49 1,782 3 16 — — — — — — —
39 2024 9–16 36.0% #161 1,714 3 16 — — — — — — —
40 2025 4–13 23.5% #157 1,640 3 16 — — — — — — —
41 2026 6–10 37.5% #117 1,632 3 16 — — — — — — —