H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Stan Wawrinka vs Rafael Nadal H2H: 3-19
Rafael Nadal holds a 19–3 lead over Stan Wawrinka in their ATP head-to-head. Across 22 main-draw meetings, Rafael Nadal leads 11–2 on hard courts and 8–1 on clay. Most recently, Rafael Nadal won the 2019 Paris Masters fourth round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Switzerland
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3
–
19
22 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 40
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2019* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Rafael Nadal | 6-4 6-4 | Stan Wawrinka | Match data |
| May 11, 2019* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Clay | Rafael Nadal | 6-1 6-2 | Stan Wawrinka | Match data |
| Aug 10, 2018* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Rafael Nadal | 7-5 7-6(4) | Stan Wawrinka | Match data |
| Jun 11, 2017* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | F | Clay | Rafael Nadal | 6-2 6-3 6-1 | Stan Wawrinka | Match data |
| Apr 16, 2016* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Clay | Rafael Nadal | 6-1 6-4 | Stan Wawrinka | Match data |
| Nov 15, 2015 | Tour Finals | ATP Finals | RR | Hard | Rafael Nadal | 6-3 6-2 | Stan Wawrinka | Match data |
| Nov 7, 2015* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Hard | Stan Wawrinka | 7-6(8) 7-6(7) | Rafael Nadal | Match data |
| Oct 17, 2015* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Hard | Rafael Nadal | 6-2 6-1 | Stan Wawrinka | Match data |
| May 16, 2015* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Clay | Stan Wawrinka | 7-6(7) 6-2 | Rafael Nadal | Match data |
| Jan 26, 2014* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | F | Hard | Stan Wawrinka | 6-3 6-2 3-6 6-3 | Rafael Nadal | Match data |
| Nov 4, 2013 | Tour Finals | ATP Finals | RR | Hard | Rafael Nadal | 7-6(5) 7-6(6) | Stan Wawrinka | Match data |
| Oct 12, 2013* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Hard | Rafael Nadal | 7-6(10) 6-1 | Stan Wawrinka | Match data |
| Jun 6, 2013* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | QF | Clay | Rafael Nadal | 6-2 6-3 6-1 | Stan Wawrinka | Match data |
| May 12, 2013* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | F | Clay | Rafael Nadal | 6-2 6-4 | Stan Wawrinka | Match data |
| Apr 21, 2012* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Clay | Rafael Nadal | 7-5 6-4 | Stan Wawrinka | Match data |
| Oct 13, 2010* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Rafael Nadal | 6-4 6-4 | Stan Wawrinka | Match data |
| Aug 12, 2010* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Rafael Nadal | 7-6(12) 6-3 | Stan Wawrinka | Match data |
| May 1, 2010* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Clay | Rafael Nadal | 6-4 6-1 | Stan Wawrinka | Match data |
| Apr 1, 2009* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Rafael Nadal | 7-6(2) 7-6(4) | Stan Wawrinka | Match data |
| Nov 2, 2007* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Rafael Nadal | 6-4 6-3 | Stan Wawrinka | Match data |
| Jul 22, 2007* | Stuttgart | ATP 250 | F | Clay | Rafael Nadal | 6-4 7-5 | Stan Wawrinka | Match data |
| Jan 21, 2007* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Rafael Nadal | 6-2 6-2 6-2 | Stan Wawrinka | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stan Wawrinka | #117 | #3 | 6,865 | 2,268 | 564 | 371 | 60.3% | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 16 |
| Rafael Nadal | #175 | #1 | 15,390 | 2,500 | 1,045 | 225 | 82.3% | 22 | 36 | 0 | 18 | 15 | 91 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Stan Wawrinka | Rafael Nadal | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #200 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #49 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2003 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #171 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #51 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2004 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,421 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 77–10 | 88.5% | #2 | 2,155 | 1 | 12 |
| 20 | 2005 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 58–12 | 82.9% | #2 | 2,129 | 2 | 17 |
| 21 | 2006 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #30 | 1,867 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 71–15 | 82.6% | #2 | 2,154 | 3 | 23 |
| 22 | 2007 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #36 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 73–11 | 86.9% | #1 | 2,254 | 5 | 30 |
| 23 | 2008 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #13 | 1,860 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 64–14 | 82.1% | #2 | 2,176 | 6 | 35 |
| 24 | 2009 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #21 | 1,875 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 71–10 | 87.7% | #1 | 2,292 | 9 | 42 |
| 25 | 2010 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #21 | 1,991 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 64–15 | 81.0% | #2 | 2,260 | 10 | 45 |
| 26 | 2011 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #17 | 1,915 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 42–7 | 85.7% | #4 | 2,333 | 11 | 49 |
| 27 | 2012 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #17 | 2,018 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 75–7 | 91.5% | #1 | 2,437 | 13 | 59 |
| 28 | 2013 | 49–23 | 68.1% | #8 | 2,113 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 49–11 | 81.7% | #3 | 2,270 | 14 | 63 |
| 29 | 2014 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #4 | 2,071 | 1 | 7 | 2015 | 60–20 | 75.0% | #5 | 2,231 | 14 | 66 |
| 30 | 2015 | 54–19 | 74.0% | #4 | 2,199 | 2 | 11 | 2016 | 36–13 | 73.5% | #9 | 2,123 | 14 | 68 |
| 31 | 2016 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #4 | 2,129 | 3 | 15 | 2017 | 67–12 | 84.8% | #1 | 2,277 | 16 | 74 |
| 32 | 2017 | 26–11 | 70.3% | #9 | 2,120 | 3 | 16 | 2018 | 43–4 | 91.5% | #2 | 2,339 | 17 | 79 |
| 33 | 2018 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,946 | 3 | 16 | 2019 | 54–9 | 85.7% | #1 | 2,345 | 19 | 83 |
| 34 | 2019 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #16 | 2,021 | 3 | 16 | 2020 | 23–5 | 82.1% | #2 | 2,299 | 20 | 85 |
| 35 | 2020 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #18 | 2,001 | 3 | 16 | 2021 | 24–5 | 82.8% | #6 | 2,269 | 20 | 87 |
| 36 | 2021 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,916 | 3 | 16 | 2022 | 40–9 | 81.6% | #2 | 2,194 | 22 | 91 |
| 37 | 2022 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #148 | 1,824 | 3 | 16 | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #670 | 2,155 | 22 | 91 |
| 38 | 2023 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #49 | 1,782 | 3 | 16 | 2024 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #153 | 2,046 | 22 | 91 |
| 39 | 2024 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #161 | 1,714 | 3 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 2025 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #157 | 1,640 | 3 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 41 | 2026 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #117 | 1,632 | 3 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |