H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Stan Wawrinka vs Rafael Nadal H2H: 3-19

Rafael Nadal holds a 19–3 lead over Stan Wawrinka in their ATP head-to-head. Across 22 main-draw meetings, Rafael Nadal leads 11–2 on hard courts and 8–1 on clay. Most recently, Rafael Nadal won the 2019 Paris Masters third round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Stan Wawrinka
Switzerland Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 19
22 main-draw meetings
Rafael Nadal
ESP Age 40 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Rafael Nadal #2 6-4 6-4 Stan Wawrinka #16 Match data Nov 1, 2019* R16 Paris Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Rafael Nadal #2 6-1 6-2 Stan Wawrinka #34 Match data May 11, 2019* QF Madrid Open Masters 1000 Clay
Rafael Nadal #1 7-5 7-6(4) Stan Wawrinka #195 Match data Aug 10, 2018* R16 Canadian Open Masters 1000 Hard
Rafael Nadal #4 6-2 6-3 6-1 Stan Wawrinka #3 Match data Jun 11, 2017* F Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Rafael Nadal #5 6-1 6-4 Stan Wawrinka #4 Match data Apr 16, 2016* QF Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Rafael Nadal #5 6-3 6-2 Stan Wawrinka #4 Match data Nov 15, 2015 RR ATP Finals ATP Finals Hard
Stan Wawrinka #4 7-6(8) 7-6(7) Rafael Nadal #6 Match data Nov 7, 2015* QF Paris Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Rafael Nadal #7 6-2 6-1 Stan Wawrinka #4 Match data Oct 17, 2015* QF Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Stan Wawrinka #9 7-6(7) 6-2 Rafael Nadal #7 Match data May 16, 2015* QF Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay
Stan Wawrinka #8 6-3 6-2 3-6 6-3 Rafael Nadal #1 Match data Jan 26, 2014* F Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Rafael Nadal #1 7-6(5) 7-6(6) Stan Wawrinka #8 Match data Nov 4, 2013 RR ATP Finals ATP Finals Hard
Rafael Nadal #1 7-6(10) 6-1 Stan Wawrinka #8 Match data Oct 12, 2013* QF Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Rafael Nadal #4 6-2 6-3 6-1 Stan Wawrinka #10 Match data Jun 6, 2013* QF Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Rafael Nadal #5 6-2 6-4 Stan Wawrinka #15 Match data May 12, 2013* F Madrid Open Masters 1000 Clay
Rafael Nadal #2 7-5 6-4 Stan Wawrinka #26 Match data Apr 21, 2012* QF Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Rafael Nadal #1 6-4 6-4 Stan Wawrinka #21 Match data Oct 13, 2010* R32 Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Rafael Nadal #1 7-6(12) 6-3 Stan Wawrinka #24 Match data Aug 12, 2010* R32 Canadian Open Masters 1000 Hard
Rafael Nadal #3 6-4 6-1 Stan Wawrinka #26 Match data May 1, 2010* QF Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay
Rafael Nadal #1 7-6(2) 7-6(4) Stan Wawrinka #17 Match data Apr 1, 2009* R16 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard
Rafael Nadal #2 6-4 6-3 Stan Wawrinka #36 Match data Nov 2, 2007* R16 Paris Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Rafael Nadal #2 6-4 7-5 Stan Wawrinka #50 Match data Jul 22, 2007* F Stuttgart Open International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Clay
Rafael Nadal #2 6-2 6-2 6-2 Stan Wawrinka #40 Match data Jan 21, 2007* R32 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Stan Wawrinka #127 #3 6,865 2,264 566 376 60.1% 3 0 1 0 3 9 16
Rafael Nadal #175 #1 15,390 2,503 1,056 228 82.2% 22 1 36 0 23 10 92

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Stan Wawrinka Rafael Nadal
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2002 1–1 50.0% #200 1,508 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2003 14–11 56.0% #49 1,640 0 0
18 2003 2–4 33.3% #171 1,483 0 0 2004 27–17 61.4% #51 1,744 0 1
19 2004 0–6 0.0% #168 1,420 0 0 2005 77–10 88.5% #2 2,156 1 12
20 2005 14–14 50.0% #54 1,633 0 0 2006 58–12 82.9% #2 2,129 2 17
21 2006 31–23 57.4% #30 1,867 0 1 2007 71–15 82.6% #2 2,154 3 23
22 2007 21–22 48.8% #36 1,866 0 1 2008 79–11 87.8% #1 2,271 5 31
23 2008 34–21 61.8% #13 1,846 0 1 2009 64–14 82.1% #2 2,182 6 36
24 2009 29–19 60.4% #21 1,875 0 1 2010 71–10 87.7% #1 2,294 9 43
25 2010 35–17 67.3% #21 1,993 0 2 2011 64–15 81.0% #2 2,257 10 46
26 2011 33–19 63.5% #17 1,916 0 3 2012 42–7 85.7% #4 2,345 11 50
27 2012 34–19 64.2% #17 2,017 0 3 2013 75–7 91.5% #1 2,439 13 60
28 2013 49–23 68.1% #8 2,121 0 4 2014 49–11 81.7% #3 2,269 14 64
29 2014 38–16 70.4% #4 2,066 1 7 2015 60–20 75.0% #5 2,234 14 67
30 2015 54–19 74.0% #4 2,215 2 11 2016 40–15 72.7% #9 2,133 14 69
31 2016 46–18 71.9% #4 2,138 3 15 2017 67–12 84.8% #1 2,309 16 75
32 2017 26–11 70.3% #9 2,123 3 16 2018 43–4 91.5% #2 2,351 17 80
33 2018 17–17 50.0% #66 1,949 3 16 2019 54–9 85.7% #1 2,378 19 84
34 2019 33–20 62.3% #16 2,028 3 16 2020 23–5 82.1% #2 2,319 20 86
35 2020 15–8 65.2% #18 2,004 3 16 2021 24–5 82.8% #6 2,278 20 88
36 2021 3–4 42.9% #82 1,938 3 16 2022 40–9 81.6% #2 2,229 22 92
37 2022 8–14 36.4% #148 1,832 3 16 2023 1–1 50.0% #670 2,189 22 92
38 2023 24–20 54.5% #49 1,784 3 16 2024 12–7 63.2% #153 2,066 22 92
39 2024 10–17 37.0% #161 1,718 3 16 — — — — — — —
40 2025 4–13 23.5% #157 1,641 3 16 — — — — — — —
41 2026 6–12 33.3% #127 1,609 3 16 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Stan Wawrinka Rafael Nadal
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1 2 3 33.3% 11 6 17 64.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
18 2003 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 14 10 24 58.3% 12 4 16 75.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
19 2004 0 1 1 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 28 6 34 82.4% 48 2 50 96.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
20 2005 3 6 9 33.3% 10 4 14 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2006 26 10 36 72.2% 24 0 24 100.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — —
21 2006 13 10 23 56.5% 11 7 18 61.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2007 32 12 44 72.7% 31 1 32 96.9% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — —
22 2007 16 12 28 57.1% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2008 45 10 55 81.8% 22 1 23 95.7% 12 0 12 100.0% — — — —
23 2008 17 14 31 54.8% 14 6 20 70.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2009 42 12 54 77.8% 22 2 24 91.7% — — — — — — — —
24 2009 14 11 25 56.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2010 40 9 49 81.6% 22 0 22 100.0% 9 1 10 90.0% — — — —
25 2010 19 11 30 63.3% 16 5 21 76.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2011 31 11 42 73.8% 25 2 27 92.6% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — —
26 2011 21 10 31 67.7% 11 7 18 61.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2012 17 4 21 81.0% 23 1 24 95.8% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 2012 16 9 25 64.0% 18 8 26 69.2% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2013 37 4 41 90.2% 38 2 40 95.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2013 21 13 34 61.8% 24 8 32 75.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2014 21 6 27 77.8% 25 3 28 89.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
29 2014 25 11 36 69.4% 6 3 9 66.7% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2015 29 12 41 70.7% 26 6 32 81.3% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
30 2015 36 13 49 73.5% 13 4 17 76.5% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2016 18 10 28 64.3% 22 5 27 81.5% — — — — — — — —
31 2016 33 12 45 73.3% 12 4 16 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2017 40 10 50 80.0% 24 1 25 96.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
32 2017 14 5 19 73.7% 12 4 16 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2018 14 2 16 87.5% 24 1 25 96.0% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — —
33 2018 14 11 25 56.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2019 28 5 33 84.8% 21 3 24 87.5% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — —
34 2019 23 13 36 63.9% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2020 14 4 18 77.8% 9 1 10 90.0% — — — — — — — —
35 2020 13 6 19 68.4% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2021 5 2 7 71.4% 19 3 22 86.4% — — — — — — — —
36 2021 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 25 6 31 80.6% 10 2 12 83.3% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — —
37 2022 5 8 13 38.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2023 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2023 13 12 25 52.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2024 2 1 3 66.7% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — — — — —
39 2024 5 8 13 38.5% 4 8 12 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2025 2 7 9 22.2% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 2026 5 5 10 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 331 212 543 61.0% 195 122 317 61.5% 34 35 69 49.3% 6 7 13 46.2% — 510 149 659 77.4% 469 53 522 89.8% 76 21 97 78.4% 1 5 6 16.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 926/942 of Stan Wawrinka's and 1,250/1,284 of Rafael Nadal's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Stan Wawrinka Rafael Nadal
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 2/2 0.5 0.5 86.2% 59.1% 31.4% 61.1% 71.4% 55.0% 39.8%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 24/25 1.5 1.9 71.3% 67.9% 53.6% 63.8% 47.9% 63.8% 40.4%
18 2003 6/6 4.0 3.2 63.8% 66.3% 47.0% 66.1% 36.5% 59.3% 37.7% 2004 43/44 1.3 2.0 70.1% 68.4% 54.4% 58.3% 46.4% 64.1% 41.2%
19 2004 6/6 4.3 3.5 56.0% 64.6% 47.3% 54.8% 21.3% 56.7% 32.3% 2005 87/87 2.5 1.5 68.7% 72.6% 58.1% 61.2% 50.5% 68.2% 46.4%
20 2005 27/28 8.2 4.4 56.2% 72.2% 52.0% 62.8% 35.2% 63.4% 37.2% 2006 69/70 3.5 1.6 68.8% 72.1% 57.4% 68.1% 47.6% 67.4% 41.6%
21 2006 54/54 6.0 3.9 55.5% 72.0% 50.9% 58.2% 42.8% 62.6% 37.4% 2007 85/86 2.8 1.5 67.7% 73.9% 57.7% 66.0% 45.9% 68.8% 42.6%
22 2007 43/43 7.0 3.1 56.2% 71.4% 51.4% 59.5% 36.9% 62.5% 36.9% 2008 84/90 3.1 1.3 69.4% 72.5% 59.4% 61.3% 48.2% 68.6% 43.4%
23 2008 53/55 5.9 2.3 60.8% 70.9% 54.5% 51.1% 46.1% 64.2% 40.6% 2009 76/78 2.9 1.3 67.0% 71.9% 57.7% 60.9% 48.9% 67.3% 43.9%
24 2009 47/48 7.0 2.6 57.9% 74.1% 53.5% 66.8% 40.1% 65.2% 39.2% 2010 81/81 3.8 1.5 67.1% 76.4% 60.1% 62.3% 49.0% 70.9% 41.7%
25 2010 52/52 6.9 2.5 57.3% 76.0% 54.7% 71.6% 42.4% 66.8% 39.5% 2011 78/79 3.4 1.6 67.2% 73.0% 58.5% 61.2% 50.2% 68.1% 44.0%
26 2011 52/52 6.2 2.4 60.6% 71.6% 53.8% 58.2% 40.0% 64.5% 38.6% 2012 48/49 3.3 1.2 67.4% 76.1% 57.9% 69.4% 51.0% 70.2% 46.0%
27 2012 52/53 7.7 2.7 56.2% 73.4% 54.2% 66.7% 50.6% 64.9% 38.9% 2013 81/82 2.7 1.5 69.2% 73.8% 58.2% 69.7% 49.9% 68.8% 43.2%
28 2013 71/72 6.9 2.6 59.9% 74.3% 56.2% 63.9% 40.2% 66.9% 38.3% 2014 59/60 3.1 1.5 70.0% 73.0% 57.0% 67.2% 51.3% 68.0% 44.9%
29 2014 51/54 8.6 2.7 56.1% 78.8% 55.5% 62.9% 45.3% 68.6% 38.0% 2015 80/80 2.8 2.1 68.0% 72.4% 55.4% 62.4% 43.3% 67.1% 41.6%
30 2015 72/73 8.0 2.5 56.3% 76.5% 56.2% 66.6% 39.9% 67.4% 36.3% 2016 47/55 2.2 1.6 71.0% 69.3% 54.7% 61.0% 47.3% 64.8% 44.1%
31 2016 64/64 7.1 2.5 58.2% 75.3% 56.9% 68.4% 41.1% 67.6% 38.3% 2017 77/79 3.7 1.6 67.5% 74.6% 63.0% 70.5% 44.6% 70.8% 44.0%
32 2017 37/37 7.1 2.2 59.1% 73.8% 56.4% 62.6% 40.2% 66.7% 36.0% 2018 47/47 2.6 1.9 65.5% 72.9% 60.7% 62.3% 49.0% 68.9% 45.6%
33 2018 34/34 7.4 2.5 59.3% 73.5% 54.1% 57.2% 29.9% 65.6% 33.9% 2019 59/63 4.6 2.0 64.8% 76.2% 60.5% 67.7% 47.1% 70.7% 43.3%
34 2019 52/53 9.8 1.8 58.5% 76.8% 56.0% 66.7% 42.3% 68.2% 35.3% 2020 28/28 4.6 1.8 62.8% 74.7% 60.9% 67.6% 54.4% 69.5% 44.6%
35 2020 23/23 9.8 1.7 59.1% 76.3% 51.8% 65.1% 41.9% 66.2% 36.8% 2021 29/29 4.0 2.7 64.0% 73.5% 55.3% 60.7% 46.4% 66.9% 44.7%
36 2021 6/7 9.8 2.7 57.2% 78.7% 51.9% 67.9% 35.2% 67.4% 34.5% 2022 47/49 4.8 3.6 65.2% 73.8% 55.8% 56.6% 48.5% 67.5% 42.0%
37 2022 22/22 7.6 1.8 55.8% 74.5% 52.1% 65.2% 46.2% 64.3% 31.5% 2023 2/2 6.0 2.5 64.6% 67.3% 49.9% 50.6% 50.0% 61.2% 36.8%
38 2023 44/44 7.8 1.9 56.7% 76.8% 53.4% 62.6% 42.9% 66.6% 35.4% 2024 17/19 2.1 1.7 69.1% 69.0% 53.5% 56.3% 43.7% 64.2% 40.2%
39 2024 25/27 7.5 2.4 55.9% 76.2% 49.5% 60.9% 33.0% 64.7% 32.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
40 2025 15/17 5.9 2.1 55.1% 67.9% 49.5% 43.7% 33.9% 59.6% 35.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
41 2026 18/18 8.9 3.2 57.9% 73.6% 52.9% 57.3% 38.8% 64.2% 33.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 926/942 7.4 2.6 57.7% 74.3% 54.1% 62.8% 40.9% 65.6% 37.2% — 1,250/1,284 3.1 1.7 67.8% 73.1% 58.0% 63.9% 48.2% 68.2% 43.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Stan Wawrinka Rafael Nadal
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1508 101.2 +0.34 -2.99 0.884 48.1% — — — 50.0% -1.00 — — — +0.13
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1641 140.0 +0.72 +2.04 1.116 52.2% -128 +81 -52 55.2% +0.40 1–5 (17%) 0–5 (0%) 94.2 +0.33
18 2003 1484 97.4 -1.62 -1.55 0.927 48.4% — +36 — 38.5% -0.69 0–1 0–2 — +0.70 2004 1744 145.4 +1.37 +3.48 1.148 52.6% -75 +92 — 59.6% +0.69 4–8 (33%) 6–7 (46%) 97.7 +0.83
19 2004 1421 107.8 -1.73 -3.43 0.746 44.5% — +50 — 7.7% -2.15 0–1 0–4 (0%) — -0.13 2005 2156 168.1 +5.90 +8.66 1.457 56.7% -139 +157 -582 80.4% +2.06 15–6 (71%) 16–9 (64%) 112.1 +0.44
20 2005 1633 131.2 +0.78 +0.37 1.017 50.2% -105 +93 — 48.8% -0.16 6–5 (55%) 8–8 (50%) 102.2 +0.62 2006 2129 165.1 +5.41 +5.16 1.277 54.2% -128 +357 -277 76.4% +1.52 11–3 (79%) 20–12 (63%) 107.4 -2.20
21 2006 1868 146.2 +0.70 +0.56 1.001 50.1% -72 -59 -316 50.7% +0.22 17–6 (74%) 10–19 (34%) 107.2 -3.52 2007 2154 170.3 +6.23 +6.38 1.363 54.9% -117 +371 -123 77.6% +1.81 11–3 (79%) 13–9 (59%) 106.5 -1.58
22 2007 1866 152.0 +0.10 +0.97 0.985 49.9% +22 -86 -397 48.3% +0.07 8–8 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 99.0 -2.17 2008 2271 172.8 +5.78 +7.19 1.382 55.5% -113 +338 +31 81.7% +2.07 16–2 (89%) 22–10 (69%) 113.6 -1.34
23 2008 1847 152.7 +1.49 +4.08 1.136 52.3% -27 +57 -235 59.3% +0.61 13–9 (59%) 15–11 (58%) 103.0 +0.04 2009 2182 178.2 +4.87 +7.91 1.342 55.0% -15 +402 — 74.3% +1.61 13–2 (87%) 16–12 (57%) 105.0 +0.99
24 2009 1875 154.2 +2.29 +2.51 1.126 51.9% -14 +13 -151 60.0% +0.61 7–8 (47%) 6–9 (40%) 95.2 +1.74 2010 2295 174.6 +7.48 +6.14 1.437 55.7% -31 +354 +112 82.7% +1.96 12–7 (63%) 22–6 (79%) 104.5 +0.16
25 2010 1994 165.4 +3.75 +3.60 1.190 52.7% -11 +33 — 64.1% +0.90 7–4 (64%) 7–12 (37%) 97.7 -1.10 2011 2257 176.9 +5.72 +8.05 1.379 55.4% -39 +410 +159 75.5% +1.65 10–6 (63%) 19–9 (68%) 99.2 -1.97
26 2011 1917 159.1 +2.18 +1.86 1.087 51.2% +94 +71 -264 58.3% +0.49 15–8 (65%) 13–12 (52%) 100.8 +1.40 2012 2345 178.2 +7.27 +8.98 1.545 57.5% -35 +358 -32 83.7% +2.37 3–3 (50%) 8–3 (73%) 100.1 -1.78
27 2012 2017 166.9 +2.86 +2.59 1.109 52.1% +27 +29 — 59.0% +0.82 14–7 (67%) 10–19 (34%) 96.9 -0.31 2013 2440 183.0 +6.19 +7.44 1.386 55.7% +11 +306 — 82.6% +2.10 14–1 (93%) 18–7 (72%) 107.7 -1.01
28 2013 2122 173.6 +4.27 +2.65 1.158 52.3% +22 +65 -417 63.7% +0.87 15–7 (68%) 16–15 (52%) 103.8 -2.10 2014 2269 173.9 +4.79 +8.24 1.406 55.9% +44 +435 -117 74.3% +1.88 9–4 (69%) 12–12 (50%) 90.8 -0.59
29 2014 2067 172.5 +4.62 +2.82 1.210 53.1% +44 +79 -127 65.0% +0.90 6–10 (38%) 20–8 (71%) 98.5 -0.20 2015 2235 176.9 +3.33 +6.13 1.265 54.0% +41 +333 -122 70.0% +1.38 14–9 (61%) 15–12 (56%) 94.4 +1.00
30 2015 2215 173.9 +3.92 +1.92 1.115 52.0% +7 +99 -216 72.4% +0.99 11–8 (58%) 33–12 (73%) 104.4 +0.51 2016 2134 174.6 +2.22 +7.13 1.252 54.3% -34 +352 — 71.1% +1.59 9–6 (60%) 8–12 (40%) 92.3 -0.77
31 2016 2138 172.3 +4.19 +2.13 1.184 52.8% +43 +135 -184 66.9% +1.04 9–7 (56%) 22–15 (59%) 95.2 +1.48 2017 2310 181.5 +7.06 +8.36 1.508 56.6% -43 +222 -250 80.3% +2.13 9–5 (64%) 15–8 (65%) 101.8 -1.97
32 2017 2123 168.5 +3.10 +0.73 1.081 51.6% +55 +142 — 64.1% +0.72 9–3 (75%) 14–6 (70%) 104.9 -1.03 2018 2351 176.2 +5.50 +8.38 1.463 56.7% -81 +242 -202 86.9% +2.46 5–1 (83%) 10–5 (67%) 104.0 -0.45
33 2018 1949 153.0 +1.77 -1.23 0.985 49.7% +73 +201 -90 52.2% -0.19 4–8 (33%) 13–8 (62%) 94.7 -0.95 2019 2379 180.2 +6.55 +7.64 1.474 56.5% -40 +196 -148 82.9% +2.39 6–2 (75%) 10–6 (63%) 101.8 -0.66
34 2019 2028 168.4 +4.01 +0.79 1.112 51.6% +42 +114 -199 61.2% +0.61 8–11 (42%) 22–15 (59%) 96.0 -1.93 2020 2319 171.0 +5.49 +6.57 1.461 56.8% -54 +222 — 79.7% +2.32 3–1 (75%) 7–6 (54%) 98.9 -0.41
35 2020 2005 154.1 +2.50 +0.39 1.090 51.5% +47 +77 — 56.7% +0.37 7–3 (70%) 6–4 (60%) 100.6 +0.13 2021 2279 165.5 +4.20 +7.79 1.347 55.7% -42 +275 — 76.5% +1.86 6–3 (67%) 3–3 (50%) 94.8 -0.99
36 2021 1939 119.2 +0.33 -1.47 1.059 51.2% +46 — — 52.6% +0.42 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.05 2022 2230 169.2 +3.67 +6.30 1.291 54.4% -30 +333 +92 73.9% +1.50 8–4 (67%) 12–5 (71%) 98.5 -0.71
37 2022 1832 141.6 +1.38 -2.07 0.883 48.4% +63 +190 -60 42.9% -0.38 6–6 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 94.7 -1.59 2023 2190 111.8 +1.96 +1.40 0.950 49.3% — — — 42.9% -0.14 — — — -0.01
38 2023 1784 145.0 +2.53 -0.13 1.062 51.0% +5 +147 +35 53.1% +0.25 8–6 (57%) 10–16 (38%) 92.5 +0.05 2024 2067 139.3 +0.62 +2.72 1.124 52.2% +59 +276 — 55.6% +0.58 5–1 (83%) 1–4 (20%) 95.9 -0.98
39 2024 1719 139.9 -0.08 -2.93 0.911 48.6% +37 +76 — 43.1% -0.21 3–7 (30%) 6–11 (35%) 91.6 -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2025 1642 129.7 -2.18 -0.78 0.884 47.8% +62 +48 — 33.3% -0.93 2–6 (25%) 5–5 (50%) 95.2 -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 2026 1609 131.3 +0.44 -1.01 0.940 49.1% +121 0 — 38.5% -0.50 2–3 (40%) 7–9 (44%) 96.6 +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2265 167.2 +2.52 +1.39 1.081 51.3% +23 +63 -206 57.8% +0.48 179–144 (55%) 255–236 (52%) 96.0 -0.94 — 2504 179.0 +5.24 +7.01 1.365 55.3% -49 +295 -72 76.9% +1.81 184–82 (69%) 253–162 (61%) 104.0 -1.07

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.