H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Stan Wawrinka vs Sergiy Stakhovsky H2H: 3-1
Stan Wawrinka holds a 3–1 lead over Sergiy Stakhovsky in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Stan Wawrinka leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Stan Wawrinka won the 2016 Dubai third round 5-7 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Switzerland
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
UKR
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2016* | Dubai | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Stan Wawrinka | 5-7 6-3 7-5 | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
| Feb 19, 2016* | Marseille | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Stan Wawrinka | 6-4 4-6 7-6(8) | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
| Feb 21, 2015* | Marseille | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Sergiy Stakhovsky | 6-4 3-6 6-4 | Stan Wawrinka | Match data |
| Aug 29, 2012* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Stan Wawrinka | 6-7(6) 7-6(2) 6-4 6-2 | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stan Wawrinka | #117 | #3 | 6,865 | 2,268 | 564 | 371 | 60.3% | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 16 |
| Sergiy Stakhovsky | #678 | #31 | 1,263 | 1,839 | 145 | 195 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Stan Wawrinka | Sergiy Stakhovsky | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2003 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #171 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #335 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,421 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #30 | 1,867 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #36 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #92 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #13 | 1,860 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,750 | 0 | 2 |
| 2009 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #21 | 1,875 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,743 | 0 | 4 |
| 2010 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #21 | 1,991 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 |
| 2011 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #17 | 1,915 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 |
| 2012 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #17 | 2,018 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,679 | 0 | 4 |
| 2013 | 49–23 | 68.1% | #8 | 2,113 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #58 | 1,686 | 0 | 4 |
| 2014 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #4 | 2,071 | 1 | 7 | 2015 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #62 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 |
| 2015 | 54–19 | 74.0% | #4 | 2,199 | 2 | 11 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 |
| 2016 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #4 | 2,129 | 3 | 15 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #122 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 |
| 2017 | 26–11 | 70.3% | #9 | 2,120 | 3 | 16 | 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #134 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| 2018 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,946 | 3 | 16 | 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 |
| 2019 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #16 | 2,021 | 3 | 16 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 |
| 2020 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #18 | 2,001 | 3 | 16 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,530 | 0 | 4 |
| 2021 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,916 | 3 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #148 | 1,824 | 3 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #49 | 1,782 | 3 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #161 | 1,714 | 3 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #157 | 1,640 | 3 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #117 | 1,632 | 3 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |