H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Stan Wawrinka vs Thijs Boogaard H2H: 1-0

Stan Wawrinka holds a 1–0 lead over Thijs Boogaard in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Stan Wawrinka leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Stan Wawrinka won the 2026 ABN AMRO Open first round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Stan Wawrinka
Switzerland Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Thijs Boogaard
Netherlands Age 18 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Stan Wawrinka #106 6-3 6-4 Thijs Boogaard Match data Feb 11, 2026 R32 ABN AMRO Open ATP 500 Hard

Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Stan Wawrinka #127 #3 6,865 2,264 566 376 60.1% 3 1 0 3 9 16
Thijs Boogaard #493 #481 92 1,512 1 2 33.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Stan Wawrinka Thijs Boogaard
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2026 1–2 33.3% #493 1,510 0 0
18 2003 2–4 33.3% #171 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2004 0–6 0.0% #168 1,420 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2005 14–14 50.0% #54 1,633 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2006 31–23 57.4% #30 1,867 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 2007 21–22 48.8% #36 1,866 0 1 — — — — — — —
23 2008 34–21 61.8% #13 1,846 0 1 — — — — — — —
24 2009 29–19 60.4% #21 1,875 0 1 — — — — — — —
25 2010 35–17 67.3% #21 1,993 0 2 — — — — — — —
26 2011 33–19 63.5% #17 1,916 0 3 — — — — — — —
27 2012 34–19 64.2% #17 2,017 0 3 — — — — — — —
28 2013 49–23 68.1% #8 2,121 0 4 — — — — — — —
29 2014 38–16 70.4% #4 2,066 1 7 — — — — — — —
30 2015 54–19 74.0% #4 2,215 2 11 — — — — — — —
31 2016 46–18 71.9% #4 2,138 3 15 — — — — — — —
32 2017 26–11 70.3% #9 2,123 3 16 — — — — — — —
33 2018 17–17 50.0% #66 1,949 3 16 — — — — — — —
34 2019 33–20 62.3% #16 2,028 3 16 — — — — — — —
35 2020 15–8 65.2% #18 2,004 3 16 — — — — — — —
36 2021 3–4 42.9% #82 1,938 3 16 — — — — — — —
37 2022 8–14 36.4% #148 1,832 3 16 — — — — — — —
38 2023 24–20 54.5% #49 1,784 3 16 — — — — — — —
39 2024 10–17 37.0% #161 1,718 3 16 — — — — — — —
40 2025 4–13 23.5% #157 1,641 3 16 — — — — — — —
41 2026 6–12 33.3% #127 1,609 3 16 — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Stan Wawrinka Thijs Boogaard
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1492 101.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1484 99.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1510 110.4 +0.98 -1.07 0.850 48.0% — — — 37.5% -0.75 1–1 0–1 — -0.16
18 2003 1484 97.4 -1.62 -1.55 0.927 48.4% — +36 — 38.5% -0.69 0–1 0–2 — +0.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 1421 107.8 -1.73 -3.43 0.746 44.5% — +50 — 7.7% -2.15 0–1 0–4 (0%) — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 1633 131.2 +0.78 +0.37 1.017 50.2% -105 +93 — 48.8% -0.16 6–5 (55%) 8–8 (50%) 102.2 +0.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2006 1868 146.2 +0.70 +0.56 1.001 50.1% -72 -59 -316 50.7% +0.22 17–6 (74%) 10–19 (34%) 107.2 -3.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2007 1866 152.0 +0.10 +0.97 0.985 49.9% +22 -86 -397 48.3% +0.07 8–8 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 99.0 -2.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2008 1847 152.7 +1.49 +4.08 1.136 52.3% -27 +57 -235 59.3% +0.61 13–9 (59%) 15–11 (58%) 103.0 +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2009 1875 154.2 +2.29 +2.51 1.126 51.9% -14 +13 -151 60.0% +0.61 7–8 (47%) 6–9 (40%) 95.2 +1.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2010 1994 165.4 +3.75 +3.60 1.190 52.7% -11 +33 — 64.1% +0.90 7–4 (64%) 7–12 (37%) 97.7 -1.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2011 1917 159.1 +2.18 +1.86 1.087 51.2% +94 +71 -264 58.3% +0.49 15–8 (65%) 13–12 (52%) 100.8 +1.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2012 2017 166.9 +2.86 +2.59 1.109 52.1% +27 +29 — 59.0% +0.82 14–7 (67%) 10–19 (34%) 96.9 -0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2013 2122 173.6 +4.27 +2.65 1.158 52.3% +22 +65 -417 63.7% +0.87 15–7 (68%) 16–15 (52%) 103.8 -2.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2014 2067 172.5 +4.62 +2.82 1.210 53.1% +44 +79 -127 65.0% +0.90 6–10 (38%) 20–8 (71%) 98.5 -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2015 2215 173.9 +3.92 +1.92 1.115 52.0% +7 +99 -216 72.4% +0.99 11–8 (58%) 33–12 (73%) 104.4 +0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2016 2138 172.3 +4.19 +2.13 1.184 52.8% +43 +135 -184 66.9% +1.04 9–7 (56%) 22–15 (59%) 95.2 +1.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 2123 168.5 +3.10 +0.73 1.081 51.6% +55 +142 — 64.1% +0.72 9–3 (75%) 14–6 (70%) 104.9 -1.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2018 1949 153.0 +1.77 -1.23 0.985 49.7% +73 +201 -90 52.2% -0.19 4–8 (33%) 13–8 (62%) 94.7 -0.95 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 2028 168.4 +4.01 +0.79 1.112 51.6% +42 +114 -199 61.2% +0.61 8–11 (42%) 22–15 (59%) 96.0 -1.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 2005 154.1 +2.50 +0.39 1.090 51.5% +47 +77 — 56.7% +0.37 7–3 (70%) 6–4 (60%) 100.6 +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 1939 119.2 +0.33 -1.47 1.059 51.2% +46 — — 52.6% +0.42 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2022 1832 141.6 +1.38 -2.07 0.883 48.4% +63 +190 -60 42.9% -0.38 6–6 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 94.7 -1.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2023 1784 145.0 +2.53 -0.13 1.062 51.0% +5 +147 +35 53.1% +0.25 8–6 (57%) 10–16 (38%) 92.5 +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2024 1719 139.9 -0.08 -2.93 0.911 48.6% +37 +76 — 43.1% -0.21 3–7 (30%) 6–11 (35%) 91.6 -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2025 1642 129.7 -2.18 -0.78 0.884 47.8% +62 +48 — 33.3% -0.93 2–6 (25%) 5–5 (50%) 95.2 -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 2026 1609 131.3 +0.44 -1.01 0.940 49.1% +121 0 — 38.5% -0.50 2–3 (40%) 7–9 (44%) 96.6 +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2265 167.2 +2.52 +1.39 1.081 51.3% +23 +63 -206 57.8% +0.48 179–144 (55%) 255–236 (52%) 96.0 -0.94 — 1512 105.5 +0.98 -1.07 0.850 48.0% — — — 37.5% -0.75 1–1 0–1 — -5.33

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.