H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Stefan Edberg vs Albert Costa H2H: 1-0
Stefan Edberg holds a 1–0 lead over Albert Costa in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Stefan Edberg leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Stefan Edberg won the 1994 Monte Carlo Masters third round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 51
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 1994* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Stefan Edberg | 6-1 6-2 | Albert Costa | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stefan Edberg | #1,347 | #1 | 3,997 | 2,233 | 744 | 246 | 75.2% | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 29 | 41 |
| Albert Costa | #669 | #6 | 2,385 | 1,996 | 368 | 263 | 58.3% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Stefan Edberg | Albert Costa | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1982 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1983 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #54 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1984 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,823 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #221 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 58–17 | 77.3% | #5 | 2,129 | 1 | 5 | 1994 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #52 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 66–20 | 76.7% | #5 | 2,121 | 1 | 8 | 1995 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1987 | 75–12 | 86.2% | #2 | 2,206 | 2 | 15 | 1996 | 46–26 | 63.9% | #13 | 1,750 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1988 | 54–15 | 78.3% | #5 | 2,080 | 3 | 18 | 1997 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,830 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 1989 | 58–16 | 78.4% | #3 | 2,149 | 3 | 20 | 1998 | 47–26 | 64.4% | #14 | 1,759 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 1990 | 67–13 | 83.8% | #1 | 2,172 | 4 | 27 | 1999 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #18 | 1,810 | 0 | 11 |
| 25 | 1991 | 73–14 | 83.9% | #1 | 2,146 | 5 | 33 | 2000 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #26 | 1,779 | 0 | 11 |
| 26 | 1992 | 64–19 | 77.1% | #2 | 2,044 | 6 | 36 | 2001 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #40 | 1,807 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | 1993 | 58–22 | 72.5% | #5 | 1,986 | 6 | 37 | 2002 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #9 | 1,796 | 1 | 12 |
| 28 | 1994 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #7 | 1,854 | 6 | 40 | 2003 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #25 | 1,767 | 1 | 12 |
| 29 | 1995 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #23 | 1,823 | 6 | 41 | 2004 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #56 | 1,668 | 1 | 12 |
| 30 | 1996 | 44–25 | 63.8% | #14 | 1,890 | 6 | 41 | 2005 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #116 | 1,619 | 1 | 12 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #623 | 1,631 | 1 | 12 |