H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Stefan Edberg vs Andreas Maurer H2H: 2-0
Stefan Edberg holds a 2–0 lead over Andreas Maurer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Stefan Edberg leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Stefan Edberg won the 1987 Rotterdam fourth round 6-0 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 68
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 1987* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Stefan Edberg | 6-0 6-0 | Andreas Maurer | Match data |
| Apr 25, 1986* | Monte Carlo | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Stefan Edberg | 0-6 6-4 6-3 | Andreas Maurer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stefan Edberg | #1,347 | #1 | 3,997 | 2,233 | 744 | 246 | 75.2% | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 29 | 41 |
| Andreas Maurer | #1,008 | #24 | 12 | 1,821 | 114 | 138 | 45.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Stefan Edberg | Andreas Maurer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1982 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1983 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #54 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1984 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,823 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1985 | 58–17 | 77.3% | #5 | 2,129 | 1 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1986 | 66–20 | 76.7% | #5 | 2,121 | 1 | 8 | 1978 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #148 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 75–12 | 86.2% | #2 | 2,206 | 2 | 15 | 1979 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #151 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 54–15 | 78.3% | #5 | 2,080 | 3 | 18 | 1980 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #200 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 58–16 | 78.4% | #3 | 2,149 | 3 | 20 | 1981 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #49 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 67–13 | 83.8% | #1 | 2,172 | 4 | 27 | 1982 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #65 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1991 | 73–14 | 83.9% | #1 | 2,146 | 5 | 33 | 1983 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #93 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1992 | 64–19 | 77.1% | #2 | 2,044 | 6 | 36 | 1984 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #129 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1993 | 58–22 | 72.5% | #5 | 1,986 | 6 | 37 | 1985 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #32 | 1,770 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1994 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #7 | 1,854 | 6 | 40 | 1986 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #58 | 1,725 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1995 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #23 | 1,823 | 6 | 41 | 1987 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #126 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1996 | 44–25 | 63.8% | #14 | 1,890 | 6 | 41 | 1988 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #384 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #636 | 1,495 | 0 | 1 |