H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Stefan Edberg vs Andres Gomez H2H: 4-0

Stefan Edberg holds a 4–0 lead over Andres Gomez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Stefan Edberg leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Stefan Edberg won the 1990 Cincinnati Open semifinal 7-5 6-3.

SWE Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4 0
4 main draw meetings
ECU Age 66 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Stefan Edberg #2 7-5 6-3 Andres Gomez #5 Match data Aug 12, 1990* SF Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard
Stefan Edberg #3 4-6 7-6 6-2 Andres Gomez #11 Match data Apr 18, 1987* SF Japan Open ATP 250 Hard
Stefan Edberg #4 6-2 6-3 Andres Gomez #10 Match data Dec 1, 1986 RR ATP Finals ATP Finals Carpet
Stefan Edberg #6 7-5 6-3 Andres Gomez #18 Match data Apr 26, 1986* QF Monte-Carlo Masters ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Stefan Edberg #1,347 #1 3,997 2,237 748 248 75.1% 6 4 1 9 21 41
Andres Gomez #1,171 #4 2,005 2,094 502 261 65.8% 1 0 0 3 17 21

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Stefan Edberg Andres Gomez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1982 0–3 0.0% 1,463 0 0
17 1983 12–10 54.5% #54 1,616 0 0
18 1984 27–18 60.0% #20 1,825 0 1
19 1985 58–17 77.3% #5 2,130 1 5 1979 11–8 57.9% #61 1,639 0 0
20 1986 66–20 76.7% #5 2,124 1 8 1980 36–23 61.0% #42 1,802 0 0
21 1987 75–12 86.2% #2 2,208 2 15 1981 36–21 63.2% #37 1,901 0 1
22 1988 58–16 78.4% #5 2,077 3 18 1982 51–25 67.1% #15 1,887 0 3
23 1989 58–16 78.4% #3 2,154 3 20 1983 43–20 68.3% #14 1,960 0 4
24 1990 67–13 83.8% #1 2,175 4 27 1984 60–13 82.2% #5 2,074 0 9
25 1991 73–14 83.9% #1 2,147 5 33 1985 26–14 65.0% #15 1,971 0 10
26 1992 64–20 76.2% #2 2,035 6 36 1986 57–20 74.0% #10 1,898 0 14
27 1993 58–22 72.5% #5 1,986 6 37 1987 46–18 71.9% #11 1,913 0 15
28 1994 53–23 69.7% #7 1,873 6 40 1988 34–18 65.4% #24 1,808 0 15
29 1995 35–19 64.8% #23 1,827 6 41 1989 32–17 65.3% #17 1,869 0 17
30 1996 44–25 63.8% #14 1,887 6 41 1990 38–27 58.5% #6 1,719 1 20
31 1991 20–19 51.3% #70 1,720 1 21
32 1992 10–12 45.5% #179 1,675 1 21
33 1993 2–6 25.0% #402 1,606 1 21

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Stefan Edberg Andres Gomez
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1982 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1983 6 5 11 54.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0%
18 1984 9 5 14 64.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 9 6 15 60.0%
19 1985 25 7 32 78.1% 8 2 10 80.0% 9 1 10 90.0% 16 7 23 69.6% 1979 1 1 2 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8%
20 1986 32 5 37 86.5% 12 3 15 80.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 16 10 26 61.5% 1980 2 2 4 50.0% 30 17 47 63.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 1987 42 5 47 89.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 14 2 16 87.5% 14 2 16 87.5% 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 32 16 48 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1988 28 9 37 75.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 12 1 13 92.3% 12 4 16 75.0% 1982 3 2 5 60.0% 38 16 54 70.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5%
23 1989 29 7 36 80.6% 9 2 11 81.8% 6 2 8 75.0% 14 5 19 73.7% 1983 16 6 22 72.7% 21 10 31 67.7% 6 4 10 60.0%
24 1990 39 5 44 88.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 10 1 11 90.9% 16 4 20 80.0% 1984 11 3 14 78.6% 35 5 40 87.5% 4 1 5 80.0% 10 4 14 71.4%
25 1991 39 7 46 84.8% 6 3 9 66.7% 10 1 11 90.9% 18 3 21 85.7% 1985 11 3 14 78.6% 8 6 14 57.1% 7 5 12 58.3%
26 1992 32 6 38 84.2% 9 3 12 75.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 16 9 25 64.0% 1986 18 5 23 78.3% 34 9 43 79.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
27 1993 24 9 33 72.7% 16 4 20 80.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 11 7 18 61.1% 1987 15 6 21 71.4% 23 8 31 74.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
28 1994 31 9 40 77.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 1988 17 9 26 65.4% 15 6 21 71.4% 2 3 5 40.0%
29 1995 26 11 37 70.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1989 12 7 19 63.2% 18 8 26 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
30 1996 18 12 30 60.0% 14 7 21 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1990 10 10 20 50.0% 24 6 30 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 10 14 28.6%
31 1991 8 10 18 44.4% 6 8 14 42.9% 6 1 7 85.7%
32 1992 2 3 5 40.0% 8 9 17 47.1%
33 1993 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
Career 380 104 484 78.5% 110 48 158 69.6% 98 26 124 79.0% 160 70 230 69.6% 130 72 202 64.4% 304 135 439 69.2% 10 8 18 55.6% 58 46 104 55.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Stefan Edberg Andres Gomez
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1982 1464 96.7 25.0% -2.62 0–2 1–0 +0.35
17 1983 1617 133.1 +5 -20 -83 52.8% +0.21 2–2 (50%) 3–4 (43%) +0.10
18 1984 1826 153.7 -28 -162 -156 60.9% +0.75 5–7 (42%) 11–11 (50%) -0.06
19 1985 2130 166.9 -89 -335 -173 72.7% +1.45 7–8 (47%) 19–14 (58%) -3.55 1979 1640 133.9 +23 53.3% +0.13 5–1 (83%) 6–1 (86%) +0.20
20 1986 2125 164.5 +27 -250 -162 69.7% +1.52 18–7 (72%) 19–13 (59%) -1.90 1980 1803 150.2 -218 +37 -239 56.6% +0.51 9–5 (64%) 7–5 (58%) -1.09
21 1987 2209 172.3 +77 -360 -99 77.7% +1.92 13–3 (81%) 19–16 (54%) -3.18 1981 1902 159.2 -233 +53 61.4% +0.73 11–11 (50%) 14–9 (61%) -2.54
22 1988 2077 159.9 +31 -199 +95 72.3% +1.37 14–8 (64%) 16–8 (67%) -2.31 1982 1887 151.8 -96 +44 60.2% +0.59 18–10 (64%) 12–9 (57%) -1.90
23 1989 2155 169.3 +39 -186 +7 73.0% +1.25 10–5 (67%) 18–9 (67%) -6.13 1983 1961 152.2 -52 +15 66.2% +0.91 8–8 (50%) 13–6 (68%) -1.48
24 1990 2176 173.1 +30 -272 +103 74.5% +1.68 16–1 (94%) 19–10 (66%) -4.50 1984 2075 162.7 -57 +57 -408 74.2% +1.57 14–6 (70%) 28–8 (78%) -0.36
25 1991 2148 168.6 +6.92 +5.37 1.372 55.2% +61 -218 +146 78.7% +1.85 12–7 (63%) 18–9 (67%) -1.02 1985 1972 156.7 +24 +63 59.6% +0.84 8–6 (57%) 6–3 (67%) -2.07
26 1992 2036 166.3 +5.64 +3.53 1.246 53.7% +37 -92 +216 68.9% +1.22 17–10 (63%) 29–14 (67%) +0.13 1986 1899 151.6 +57 +84 65.3% +0.96 19–3 (86%) 15–13 (54%) +0.32
27 1993 1987 165.8 +3.09 +4.76 1.184 52.9% +16 +31 +233 67.6% +1.11 15–9 (63%) 24–13 (65%) -2.70 1987 1914 153.2 +9 +79 -210 65.7% +0.91 13–5 (72%) 19–11 (63%) -0.88
28 1994 1874 159.8 +4.24 +3.69 1.218 53.6% +60 +64 +297 67.4% +1.26 11–10 (52%) 13–11 (54%) +1.11 1988 1808 143.7 -7 +174 59.9% +0.53 14–6 (70%) 13–4 (76%) +0.08
29 1995 1827 152.9 +1.63 +3.73 1.143 52.1% +69 +91 +198 60.3% +0.83 12–7 (63%) 13–7 (65%) +0.90 1989 1869 146.8 -39 +112 60.4% +0.46 9–7 (56%) 13–12 (52%) -1.82
30 1996 1888 152.3 +2.04 +3.83 1.139 52.1% -26 +12 +184 60.6% +0.82 9–9 (50%) 13–17 (43%) -2.82 1990 1719 152.3 -59 +350 56.2% +0.37 14–14 (50%) 22–13 (63%) +1.72
31 1991 1720 132.4 +1.72 -0.14 1.075 51.3% -41 +210 52.1% +0.27 8–8 (50%) 6–5 (55%) +1.82
32 1992 1676 124.1 +0.46 -0.28 0.968 49.8% -20 +116 50.0% +0.13 3–3 (50%) 3–5 (38%) -0.39
33 1993 1607 107.6 -1.77 +0.32 0.915 48.6% +122 38.1% -0.95 1–4 (20%) 4–1 (80%) +0.27
Career 2237 168.9 +4.15 +4.19 1.222 53.4% +27 -108 +46 69.9% +1.32 161–95 (63%) 235–156 (60%) 102.1 -2.58 2094 156.6 +0.93 -0.14 1.018 50.5% -35 +90 -295 61.4% +0.71 154–97 (61%) 181–105 (63%) 109.8 -1.07

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.