H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Stefan Edberg vs Danie Visser H2H: 1-0
Stefan Edberg holds a 1–0 lead over Danie Visser in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Stefan Edberg leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Stefan Edberg won the 1989 Indianapolis third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 64
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 1989* | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Stefan Edberg | 6-4 6-4 | Danie Visser | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stefan Edberg | #1,347 | #1 | 3,997 | 2,233 | 744 | 246 | 75.2% | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 29 | 41 |
| Danie Visser | #749 | #59 | 191 | 1,709 | 92 | 129 | 41.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Stefan Edberg | Danie Visser | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1982 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1983 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #54 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1984 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,823 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1985 | 58–17 | 77.3% | #5 | 2,129 | 1 | 5 | 1981 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 66–20 | 76.7% | #5 | 2,121 | 1 | 8 | 1982 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #93 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 75–12 | 86.2% | #2 | 2,206 | 2 | 15 | 1983 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #138 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 54–15 | 78.3% | #5 | 2,080 | 3 | 18 | 1984 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #72 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 58–16 | 78.4% | #3 | 2,149 | 3 | 20 | 1985 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #145 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 67–13 | 83.8% | #1 | 2,172 | 4 | 27 | 1986 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #83 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1991 | 73–14 | 83.9% | #1 | 2,146 | 5 | 33 | 1987 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #136 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1992 | 64–19 | 77.1% | #2 | 2,044 | 6 | 36 | 1988 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #143 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1993 | 58–22 | 72.5% | #5 | 1,986 | 6 | 37 | 1989 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #141 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1994 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #7 | 1,854 | 6 | 40 | 1990 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #197 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1995 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #23 | 1,823 | 6 | 41 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #405 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1996 | 44–25 | 63.8% | #14 | 1,890 | 6 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |