H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Stefan Edberg vs Fabrice Santoro H2H: 3-1

Stefan Edberg holds a 3–1 lead over Fabrice Santoro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Stefan Edberg leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Stefan Edberg won the 1995 Roland Garros round of 128 6-2 6-0 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Stefan Edberg
SWE Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Fabrice Santoro
FRA Age 53 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Stefan Edberg #17 6-2 6-0 6-2 Fabrice Santoro #34 Match data May 31, 1995* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Fabrice Santoro #45 6-3 6-1 Stefan Edberg #17 Match data Apr 26, 1995* R64 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Stefan Edberg #4 6-2 6-3 Fabrice Santoro #99 Match data Mar 5, 1994* R16 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Stefan Edberg #4 6-2 6-1 6-1 Fabrice Santoro #68 Match data Jan 23, 1994* R32 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Stefan Edberg #1,347 #1 3,997 2,237 748 248 75.1% 6 4 1 9 21 41
Fabrice Santoro #142 #17 1,516 1,890 462 435 51.5% 0 0 0 1 5 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Stefan Edberg Fabrice Santoro
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1982 0–3 0.0% — 1,463 0 0 1989 3–6 33.3% #235 1,509 0 0
17 1983 12–10 54.5% #54 1,616 0 0 1990 15–16 48.4% #62 1,684 0 0
18 1984 27–18 60.0% #20 1,825 0 1 1991 26–21 55.3% #43 1,697 0 0
19 1985 58–17 77.3% #5 2,130 1 5 1992 28–23 54.9% #43 1,748 0 0
20 1986 66–20 76.7% #5 2,124 1 8 1993 24–26 48.0% #55 1,631 0 0
21 1987 75–12 86.2% #2 2,208 2 15 1994 24–18 57.1% #46 1,736 0 0
22 1988 58–16 78.4% #5 2,077 3 18 1995 16–25 39.0% #102 1,610 0 0
23 1989 58–16 78.4% #3 2,154 3 20 1996 6–12 33.3% #118 1,558 0 0
24 1990 67–13 83.8% #1 2,175 4 27 1997 32–23 58.2% #29 1,803 0 1
25 1991 73–14 83.9% #1 2,147 5 33 1998 27–27 50.0% #41 1,708 0 1
26 1992 64–20 76.2% #2 2,035 6 36 1999 36–25 59.0% #34 1,765 0 2
27 1993 58–22 72.5% #5 1,986 6 37 2000 34–27 55.7% #31 1,739 0 3
28 1994 53–23 69.7% #7 1,873 6 40 2001 35–26 57.4% #22 1,769 0 3
29 1995 35–19 64.8% #23 1,827 6 41 2002 27–25 51.9% #35 1,740 0 4
30 1996 44–25 63.8% #14 1,887 6 41 2003 17–21 44.7% #62 1,708 0 4
31 — — — — — — — 2004 18–15 54.5% #52 1,815 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 2005 18–19 48.6% #58 1,781 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2006 19–23 45.2% #52 1,701 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2007 24–19 55.8% #37 1,788 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2008 18–17 51.4% #52 1,757 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 2009 15–20 42.9% #68 1,696 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #142 1,689 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Stefan Edberg Fabrice Santoro
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1982 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1989 1 1 2 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1983 6 5 11 54.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1990 8 4 12 66.7% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
18 1984 9 5 14 64.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 9 6 15 60.0% 1991 13 10 23 56.5% 11 8 19 57.9% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
19 1985 25 7 32 78.1% 8 2 10 80.0% 9 1 10 90.0% 16 7 23 69.6% 1992 6 6 12 50.0% 21 13 34 61.8% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0%
20 1986 32 5 37 86.5% 12 3 15 80.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 16 10 26 61.5% 1993 16 14 30 53.3% 8 11 19 42.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1987 42 5 47 89.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 14 2 16 87.5% 14 2 16 87.5% 1994 12 9 21 57.1% 12 8 20 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1988 28 9 37 75.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 12 1 13 92.3% 12 4 16 75.0% 1995 3 7 10 30.0% 13 14 27 48.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
23 1989 29 7 36 80.6% 9 2 11 81.8% 6 2 8 75.0% 14 5 19 73.7% 1996 1 4 5 20.0% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — — — — —
24 1990 39 5 44 88.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 10 1 11 90.9% 16 4 20 80.0% 1997 9 6 15 60.0% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 11 7 18 61.1%
25 1991 39 7 46 84.8% 6 3 9 66.7% 10 1 11 90.9% 18 3 21 85.7% 1998 14 15 29 48.3% 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0%
26 1992 32 6 38 84.2% 9 3 12 75.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 16 9 25 64.0% 1999 22 12 34 64.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 8 6 14 57.1%
27 1993 24 9 33 72.7% 16 4 20 80.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 11 7 18 61.1% 2000 22 16 38 57.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
28 1994 31 9 40 77.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 2001 20 15 35 57.1% 7 6 13 53.8% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
29 1995 26 11 37 70.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2002 22 14 36 61.1% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
30 1996 18 12 30 60.0% 14 7 21 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 2003 11 11 22 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 13 11 24 54.2% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 10 9 19 52.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 9 13 22 40.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 3 6 50.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 15 12 27 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 11 10 21 52.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 8 13 21 38.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 380 104 484 78.5% 110 48 158 69.6% 98 26 124 79.0% 160 70 230 69.6% — 246 213 459 53.6% 128 136 264 48.5% 44 33 77 57.1% 44 53 97 45.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 392/450 of Stefan Edberg's and 766/857 of Fabrice Santoro's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Stefan Edberg Fabrice Santoro
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 43/47 1.3 2.4 59.8% 64.2% 47.7% 57.1% 45.6% 57.5% 43.8%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 41/51 1.9 3.2 58.7% 63.0% 51.9% 51.4% 47.1% 58.2% 42.1%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 46/50 1.3 2.7 61.4% 64.0% 51.2% 51.1% 47.6% 58.6% 41.1%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 36/42 2.5 3.1 61.1% 66.0% 51.6% 64.6% 42.4% 60.0% 42.5%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 39/41 2.0 3.4 61.1% 62.4% 48.9% 54.4% 37.3% 57.2% 39.6%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 13/18 1.6 3.2 53.2% 61.7% 49.9% 50.7% 47.8% 56.1% 36.9%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 48/55 3.4 2.1 50.9% 70.6% 54.1% 56.5% 43.0% 62.5% 40.7%
25 1991 77/87 3.0 2.9 63.0% 75.5% 56.0% 60.7% 45.0% 68.3% 43.6% 1998 42/54 3.0 2.0 54.4% 67.3% 51.7% 57.4% 43.3% 60.1% 40.6%
26 1992 75/84 3.5 3.6 63.9% 74.6% 54.9% 64.0% 45.3% 67.4% 40.6% 1999 51/61 3.1 2.4 58.3% 67.4% 50.4% 61.7% 41.5% 60.2% 38.7%
27 1993 63/80 2.9 4.6 60.3% 73.6% 51.0% 59.4% 47.5% 64.4% 42.1% 2000 51/61 3.2 2.6 55.4% 68.5% 52.3% 55.2% 44.2% 61.1% 39.0%
28 1994 62/76 2.8 3.6 62.4% 72.9% 53.8% 61.0% 47.0% 65.7% 41.8% 2001 51/61 2.8 1.7 57.0% 66.1% 51.9% 62.8% 47.5% 60.0% 39.2%
29 1995 52/54 3.0 3.6 61.0% 72.5% 49.2% 60.5% 46.4% 63.6% 41.6% 2002 43/52 3.9 2.7 56.0% 69.4% 53.4% 54.4% 42.1% 62.2% 40.2%
30 1996 63/69 3.9 4.1 59.0% 72.3% 52.5% 58.8% 41.9% 64.0% 41.0% 2003 38/38 2.9 2.2 59.9% 67.0% 49.7% 47.3% 39.7% 59.9% 39.2%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 31/33 4.2 1.8 56.0% 69.3% 51.0% 56.2% 37.7% 61.0% 38.8%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 37/37 3.4 1.4 58.5% 64.7% 51.6% 59.6% 36.9% 59.4% 40.2%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 42/42 4.3 2.6 58.4% 68.0% 48.9% 56.2% 46.1% 60.0% 38.2%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 43/43 5.0 1.5 55.7% 72.3% 54.2% 57.1% 45.6% 64.1% 38.6%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 35/35 3.5 1.3 57.5% 69.5% 53.5% 57.8% 41.1% 62.7% 37.2%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 35/35 4.8 1.9 56.6% 69.3% 49.5% 56.5% 41.4% 60.9% 36.1%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 1/1 0.0 1.0 60.2% 66.2% 48.8% 70.6% 50.0% 59.3% 30.4%
Career — 392/996 3.2 3.7 61.7% 73.7% 53.2% 60.9% 45.5% 65.8% 41.8% — 766/897 3.1 2.3 57.4% 67.1% 51.3% 56.5% 43.2% 60.3% 39.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Stefan Edberg Fabrice Santoro
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1982 1464 96.7 — — — — — — — 25.0% -2.62 0–2 1–0 — +0.35 1989 1509 117.4 — — — — +25 +18 — 37.5% -0.75 2–2 (50%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.24
17 1983 1617 133.1 — — — — +5 -20 -83 52.8% +0.21 2–2 (50%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.10 1990 1685 143.3 — — — — -18 -64 — 53.2% -0.15 2–7 (22%) 6–3 (67%) — -1.45
18 1984 1826 153.7 — — — — -28 -162 -156 60.9% +0.75 5–7 (42%) 11–11 (50%) — -0.06 1991 1698 140.2 -2.94 +4.41 1.033 50.6% -23 +17 — 55.5% +0.39 8–9 (47%) 7–4 (64%) — -0.38
19 1985 2130 166.9 — — — — -89 -335 -173 72.7% +1.45 7–8 (47%) 19–14 (58%) — -3.55 1992 1748 143.8 -2.09 +2.77 1.007 50.2% -63 +37 — 53.7% +0.24 7–6 (54%) 13–6 (68%) — -1.57
20 1986 2125 164.5 — — — — +27 -250 -162 69.7% +1.52 18–7 (72%) 19–13 (59%) — -1.90 1993 1632 140.6 -2.07 +2.75 0.993 49.9% +48 +70 — 46.7% -0.12 9–7 (56%) 5–8 (38%) — -0.03
21 1987 2209 172.3 — — — — +77 -360 -99 77.7% +1.92 13–3 (81%) 19–16 (54%) — -3.18 1994 1737 139.2 -1.00 +3.08 1.062 51.3% -5 +10 — 56.3% +0.29 9–9 (50%) 8–4 (67%) — -0.43
22 1988 2077 159.9 — — — — +31 -199 +95 72.3% +1.37 14–8 (64%) 16–8 (67%) — -2.31 1995 1611 128.7 -2.75 +0.77 0.927 48.4% -29 +106 — 43.8% -0.57 6–11 (35%) 3–8 (27%) — +0.74
23 1989 2155 169.3 — — — — +39 -186 +7 73.0% +1.25 10–5 (67%) 18–9 (67%) — -6.13 1996 1558 113.5 -2.78 -1.32 0.840 46.7% -8 +78 — 35.9% -1.13 2–2 (50%) 3–7 (30%) — +0.36
24 1990 2176 173.1 — — — — +30 -272 +103 74.5% +1.68 16–1 (94%) 19–10 (66%) — -4.50 1997 1804 152.5 +0.69 +3.16 1.085 51.3% -35 -44 — 56.1% +0.33 11–9 (55%) 11–3 (79%) — -2.98
25 1991 2148 168.6 +6.92 +5.37 1.372 55.2% +61 -218 +146 78.7% +1.85 12–7 (63%) 18–9 (67%) — -1.02 1998 1709 143.8 -1.02 +2.20 1.017 50.4% -3 +74 — 50.7% -0.05 10–12 (45%) 8–5 (62%) — -0.42
26 1992 2036 166.3 +5.64 +3.53 1.246 53.7% +37 -92 +216 68.9% +1.22 17–10 (63%) 29–14 (67%) — +0.13 1999 1766 144.6 -1.34 +1.00 0.973 49.6% +38 -13 -220 56.4% +0.23 10–5 (67%) 13–8 (62%) — +1.38
27 1993 1987 165.8 +3.09 +4.76 1.184 52.9% +16 +31 +233 67.6% +1.11 15–9 (63%) 24–13 (65%) — -2.70 2000 1740 141.2 -0.34 +2.05 1.004 50.0% +13 +19 -204 51.0% -0.11 13–8 (62%) 10–12 (45%) — -0.61
28 1994 1874 159.8 +4.24 +3.69 1.218 53.6% +60 +64 +297 67.4% +1.26 11–10 (52%) 13–11 (54%) — +1.11 2001 1769 141.9 -1.14 +1.52 0.980 49.9% -19 +17 -124 56.3% +0.07 9–7 (56%) 10–6 (63%) — -0.40
29 1995 1827 152.9 +1.63 +3.73 1.143 52.1% +69 +91 +198 60.3% +0.83 12–7 (63%) 13–7 (65%) — +0.90 2002 1740 141.0 -0.22 +2.22 1.064 51.1% +48 -51 -125 51.5% +0.12 10–12 (45%) 12–11 (52%) — +1.01
30 1996 1888 152.3 +2.04 +3.83 1.139 52.1% -26 +12 +184 60.6% +0.82 9–9 (50%) 13–17 (43%) — -2.82 2003 1709 127.8 -1.70 +2.05 0.978 49.4% +20 -96 -93 45.7% -0.26 9–10 (47%) 2–6 (25%) — -0.35
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1816 137.3 -1.06 +1.68 0.997 49.9% -21 -159 — 50.0% +0.07 5–3 (63%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.43
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1781 146.7 -1.92 +3.04 0.990 49.9% +42 -184 -142 50.0% +0.01 6–5 (55%) 6–8 (43%) — -2.81
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1702 141.3 -1.28 +1.44 0.957 49.5% +11 -128 +3 48.2% -0.10 4–9 (31%) 7–8 (47%) — -2.48
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1788 144.1 +1.04 +2.02 1.074 51.2% -11 — +11 55.1% +0.11 6–9 (40%) 12–5 (71%) — -1.41
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1758 141.9 -0.13 +0.94 0.995 50.0% +37 -208 +68 49.4% -0.26 3–2 (60%) 9–6 (60%) — -0.59
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1696 134.7 -1.83 -0.14 0.922 48.5% -3 -186 +180 42.9% -0.27 6–6 (50%) 4–9 (31%) — -1.38
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1690 110.3 +0.81 +1.44 0.747 46.0% — — — 0.0% -2.33 — — — -0.30
Career — 2237 168.9 +4.15 +4.19 1.222 53.4% +27 -108 +46 69.9% +1.32 161–95 (63%) 235–156 (60%) 102.1 -2.58 — 1890 147.6 -1.17 +2.02 1.000 50.0% +6 +5 -36 51.0% -0.01 147–150 (49%) 155–133 (54%) 103.9 -1.65

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.