H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Stefan Edberg vs Horacio de la Pena H2H: 1-0
Stefan Edberg holds a 1–0 lead over Horacio de la Pena in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Stefan Edberg leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Stefan Edberg won the 1988 Cincinnati third round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 59
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 1988* | Cincinnati | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Stefan Edberg | 7-5 6-2 | Horacio de la Pena | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stefan Edberg | #1,347 | #1 | 3,997 | 2,233 | 744 | 246 | 75.2% | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 29 | 41 |
| Horacio de la Pena | #846 | #31 | 679 | 1,832 | 185 | 173 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Stefan Edberg | Horacio de la Pena | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1982 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1983 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #54 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #89 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1984 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,823 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #70 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1985 | 58–17 | 77.3% | #5 | 2,129 | 1 | 5 | 1986 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #38 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1986 | 66–20 | 76.7% | #5 | 2,121 | 1 | 8 | 1987 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #88 | 1,642 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1987 | 75–12 | 86.2% | #2 | 2,206 | 2 | 15 | 1988 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #52 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1988 | 54–15 | 78.3% | #5 | 2,080 | 3 | 18 | 1989 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #128 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1989 | 58–16 | 78.4% | #3 | 2,149 | 3 | 20 | 1990 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #63 | 1,724 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1990 | 67–13 | 83.8% | #1 | 2,172 | 4 | 27 | 1991 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #101 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1991 | 73–14 | 83.9% | #1 | 2,146 | 5 | 33 | 1992 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #114 | 1,552 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1992 | 64–19 | 77.1% | #2 | 2,044 | 6 | 36 | 1993 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #79 | 1,595 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1993 | 58–22 | 72.5% | #5 | 1,986 | 6 | 37 | 1994 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #265 | 1,555 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1994 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #7 | 1,854 | 6 | 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1995 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #23 | 1,823 | 6 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1996 | 44–25 | 63.8% | #14 | 1,890 | 6 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |