H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Stefan Edberg vs Jim Grabb H2H: 7-1

Stefan Edberg holds a 7–1 lead over Jim Grabb in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Stefan Edberg leads 4–1 on hard courts and 3–0 on carpet. Most recently, Stefan Edberg won the 1992 Tokyo Indoor third round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Stefan Edberg
SWE Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
7 – 1
8 main draw meetings
Jim Grabb
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 15, 1992* Tokyo Indoor ATP 250 R32 Carpet Stefan Edberg #3 6-4 6-4 Jim Grabb #78 Match data
Aug 16, 1992* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Stefan Edberg #2 6-3 7-6(5) Jim Grabb #92 Match data
Sep 1, 1991* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Stefan Edberg #2 7-6(8) 4-6 6-3 6-4 Jim Grabb #121 Match data
Apr 14, 1990* Tokyo Outdoor ATP 250 QF Hard Stefan Edberg #2 6-3 6-3 Jim Grabb #49 Match data
Feb 19, 1988* Memphis ATP 250 R16 Hard Jim Grabb #62 6-4 6-4 Stefan Edberg #3 Match data
Apr 16, 1987* Tokyo Outdoor ATP 250 R32 Hard Stefan Edberg #3 7-5 6-4 Jim Grabb #69 Match data
Mar 21, 1987* Rotterdam ATP 250 SF Carpet Stefan Edberg #3 6-3 6-4 Jim Grabb #90 Match data
Sep 27, 1986* San Francisco ATP 250 QF Carpet Stefan Edberg #3 7-6 6-4 Jim Grabb #280 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Stefan Edberg #1,347 #1 3,997 2,233 744 246 75.2% 6 5 1 0 29 41
Jim Grabb #927 #24 760 1,828 179 199 47.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Stefan Edberg Jim Grabb
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1982 0–3 0.0% — 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1983 12–10 54.5% #54 1,616 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1984 27–18 60.0% #20 1,823 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1985 58–17 77.3% #5 2,129 1 5 — — — — — — —
20 1986 66–20 76.7% #5 2,121 1 8 — — — — — — —
21 1987 75–12 86.2% #2 2,206 2 15 1985 4–4 50.0% #251 1,560 0 0
22 1988 54–15 78.3% #5 2,080 3 18 1986 7–6 53.8% #94 1,636 0 0
23 1989 58–16 78.4% #3 2,149 3 20 1987 20–18 52.6% #66 1,687 0 1
24 1990 67–13 83.8% #1 2,172 4 27 1988 17–23 42.5% #91 1,562 0 1
25 1991 73–14 83.9% #1 2,146 5 33 1989 27–20 57.4% #35 1,767 0 1
26 1992 64–19 77.1% #2 2,044 6 36 1990 16–18 47.1% #72 1,687 0 1
27 1993 58–22 72.5% #5 1,986 6 37 1991 19–23 45.2% #87 1,679 0 1
28 1994 53–23 69.7% #7 1,854 6 40 1992 31–24 56.4% #55 1,747 0 2
29 1995 35–19 64.8% #23 1,823 6 41 1993 6–9 40.0% #197 1,690 0 2
30 1996 44–25 63.8% #14 1,890 6 41 1994 18–20 47.4% #68 1,669 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 1995 6–17 26.1% #207 1,544 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 1996 6–10 37.5% #199 1,565 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 1997 2–7 22.2% #342 1,516 0 2