H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Stefan Edberg vs Luiz Mattar H2H: 2-0
Stefan Edberg holds a 2–0 lead over Luiz Mattar in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Stefan Edberg leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Stefan Edberg won the 1992 US Open first round 6-4 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 62
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 1992* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Stefan Edberg | 6-4 7-5 6-2 | Luiz Mattar | Match data |
| Oct 8, 1988* | Basel | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Stefan Edberg | 6-2 6-3 | Luiz Mattar | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stefan Edberg | #1,347 | #1 | 3,997 | 2,233 | 744 | 246 | 75.2% | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 29 | 41 |
| Luiz Mattar | #888 | #29 | 796 | 1,772 | 176 | 161 | 52.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Stefan Edberg | Luiz Mattar | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1982 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1983 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #54 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1984 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,823 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1985 | 58–17 | 77.3% | #5 | 2,129 | 1 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1986 | 66–20 | 76.7% | #5 | 2,121 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1987 | 75–12 | 86.2% | #2 | 2,206 | 2 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1988 | 54–15 | 78.3% | #5 | 2,080 | 3 | 18 | 1986 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #95 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 58–16 | 78.4% | #3 | 2,149 | 3 | 20 | 1987 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #38 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1990 | 67–13 | 83.8% | #1 | 2,172 | 4 | 27 | 1988 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #44 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1991 | 73–14 | 83.9% | #1 | 2,146 | 5 | 33 | 1989 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #62 | 1,684 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1992 | 64–19 | 77.1% | #2 | 2,044 | 6 | 36 | 1990 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #43 | 1,696 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1993 | 58–22 | 72.5% | #5 | 1,986 | 6 | 37 | 1991 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #113 | 1,635 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1994 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #7 | 1,854 | 6 | 40 | 1992 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #51 | 1,718 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 1995 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #23 | 1,823 | 6 | 41 | 1993 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #70 | 1,691 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 1996 | 44–25 | 63.8% | #14 | 1,890 | 6 | 41 | 1994 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #73 | 1,696 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #404 | 1,593 | 0 | 7 |