H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Stefan Edberg vs Marc Rosset H2H: 3-1
Stefan Edberg holds a 3–1 lead over Marc Rosset in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Stefan Edberg leads 1–0 on carpet, while Marc Rosset leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Marc Rosset won the 1996 Roland Garros fourth round 7-6(4) 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 55
Right-Handed
201 cm / 6'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 1996* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Marc Rosset | 7-6(4) 6-3 6-3 | Stefan Edberg | Match data |
| Oct 2, 1993* | Basel | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Stefan Edberg | 6-4 7-6(5) | Marc Rosset | Match data |
| Jun 26, 1991* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Stefan Edberg | 6-4 6-4 6-4 | Marc Rosset | Match data |
| Oct 27, 1990* | Stockholm Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Carpet | Stefan Edberg | 6-4 6-4 | Marc Rosset | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stefan Edberg | #1,347 | #1 | 3,997 | 2,233 | 744 | 246 | 75.2% | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 29 | 41 |
| Marc Rosset | #1,490 | #9 | 2,069 | 1,950 | 398 | 334 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 14 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Stefan Edberg | Marc Rosset | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1982 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1983 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #54 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #474 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1984 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,823 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 7–2 | 77.8% | #45 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1985 | 58–17 | 77.3% | #5 | 2,129 | 1 | 5 | 1990 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #22 | 1,811 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1986 | 66–20 | 76.7% | #5 | 2,121 | 1 | 8 | 1991 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #60 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1987 | 75–12 | 86.2% | #2 | 2,206 | 2 | 15 | 1992 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #35 | 1,826 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1988 | 54–15 | 78.3% | #5 | 2,080 | 3 | 18 | 1993 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #16 | 1,922 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 1989 | 58–16 | 78.4% | #3 | 2,149 | 3 | 20 | 1994 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #14 | 1,925 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 1990 | 67–13 | 83.8% | #1 | 2,172 | 4 | 27 | 1995 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #15 | 1,814 | 0 | 10 |
| 25 | 1991 | 73–14 | 83.9% | #1 | 2,146 | 5 | 33 | 1996 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #22 | 1,771 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1992 | 64–19 | 77.1% | #2 | 2,044 | 6 | 36 | 1997 | 32–31 | 50.8% | #31 | 1,630 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | 1993 | 58–22 | 72.5% | #5 | 1,986 | 6 | 37 | 1998 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,749 | 0 | 11 |
| 28 | 1994 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #7 | 1,854 | 6 | 40 | 1999 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #45 | 1,658 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | 1995 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #23 | 1,823 | 6 | 41 | 2000 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #28 | 1,723 | 0 | 14 |
| 30 | 1996 | 44–25 | 63.8% | #14 | 1,890 | 6 | 41 | 2001 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #119 | 1,601 | 0 | 14 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,597 | 0 | 14 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #122 | 1,586 | 0 | 14 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #214 | 1,546 | 0 | 14 |