H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Stefan Edberg vs Mark Woodforde H2H: 2-1
Stefan Edberg holds a 2–1 lead over Mark Woodforde in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Stefan Edberg leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Stefan Edberg won the 1994 Tokyo Indoor fourth round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 60
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 1994* | Tokyo Indoor | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Stefan Edberg | 6-4 6-4 | Mark Woodforde | Match data |
| Oct 4, 1991* | Sydney Indoor | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Stefan Edberg | 6-4 6-2 | Mark Woodforde | Match data |
| Aug 11, 1988* | Montreal / Toronto | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Mark Woodforde | 6-7 7-5 6-2 | Stefan Edberg | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stefan Edberg | #1,347 | #1 | 3,997 | 2,233 | 744 | 246 | 75.2% | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 29 | 41 |
| Mark Woodforde | #985 | #19 | 1,291 | 1,922 | 313 | 294 | 51.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Stefan Edberg | Mark Woodforde | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1982 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1983 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #54 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1984 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,823 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1985 | 58–17 | 77.3% | #5 | 2,129 | 1 | 5 | 1985 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #127 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 66–20 | 76.7% | #5 | 2,121 | 1 | 8 | 1986 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #181 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1987 | 75–12 | 86.2% | #2 | 2,206 | 2 | 15 | 1987 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #67 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1988 | 54–15 | 78.3% | #5 | 2,080 | 3 | 18 | 1988 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,800 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1989 | 58–16 | 78.4% | #3 | 2,149 | 3 | 20 | 1989 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #75 | 1,710 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1990 | 67–13 | 83.8% | #1 | 2,172 | 4 | 27 | 1990 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,716 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1991 | 73–14 | 83.9% | #1 | 2,146 | 5 | 33 | 1991 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #88 | 1,631 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1992 | 64–19 | 77.1% | #2 | 2,044 | 6 | 36 | 1992 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #40 | 1,814 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1993 | 58–22 | 72.5% | #5 | 1,986 | 6 | 37 | 1993 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #28 | 1,792 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1994 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #7 | 1,854 | 6 | 40 | 1994 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #43 | 1,792 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1995 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #23 | 1,823 | 6 | 41 | 1995 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #51 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 1996 | 44–25 | 63.8% | #14 | 1,890 | 6 | 41 | 1996 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #27 | 1,800 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #46 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #58 | 1,747 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #130 | 1,611 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #321 | 1,584 | 0 | 4 |