H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC
Stefan Edberg holds a 1–0 lead over Martin Damm Sr in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Stefan Edberg leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Stefan Edberg won the 1995 US Open round of 128 6-0 6-3 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stefan Edberg | 6-0 6-3 7-6(4) | Martin Damm Sr | Match data | Aug 30, 1995* | R128 | US Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stefan Edberg | #1,347 | #1 | 3,997 | 2,237 | 748 | 248 | 75.1% | 6 | 4 | 1 | 9 | 21 | 41 |
| Martin Damm Sr | — | — | — | 1,731 | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Stefan Edberg | Martin Damm Sr | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1982 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #54 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,825 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 58–17 | 77.3% | #5 | 2,130 | 1 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 66–20 | 76.7% | #5 | 2,124 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 75–12 | 86.2% | #2 | 2,208 | 2 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 58–16 | 78.4% | #5 | 2,077 | 3 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 58–16 | 78.4% | #3 | 2,154 | 3 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 67–13 | 83.8% | #1 | 2,175 | 4 | 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 73–14 | 83.9% | #1 | 2,147 | 5 | 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 64–20 | 76.2% | #2 | 2,035 | 6 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 58–22 | 72.5% | #5 | 1,986 | 6 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #7 | 1,873 | 6 | 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #23 | 1,827 | 6 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 44–25 | 63.8% | #14 | 1,887 | 6 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Stefan Edberg | Martin Damm Sr | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1982 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 1990 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 1991 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 1985 | 25 | 7 | 32 | 78.1% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 9 | 1 | 10 | 90.0% | 16 | 7 | 23 | 69.6% | 1992 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 1986 | 32 | 5 | 37 | 86.5% | 12 | 3 | 15 | 80.0% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 16 | 10 | 26 | 61.5% | 1993 | 7 | 11 | 18 | 38.9% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% |
| 1987 | 42 | 5 | 47 | 89.4% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 14 | 2 | 16 | 87.5% | 14 | 2 | 16 | 87.5% | 1994 | 7 | 12 | 19 | 36.8% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% |
| 1988 | 28 | 9 | 37 | 75.7% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 12 | 1 | 13 | 92.3% | 12 | 4 | 16 | 75.0% | 1995 | 7 | 13 | 20 | 35.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% |
| 1989 | 29 | 7 | 36 | 80.6% | 9 | 2 | 11 | 81.8% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 14 | 5 | 19 | 73.7% | 1996 | 15 | 13 | 28 | 53.6% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 13 | 10 | 23 | 56.5% |
| 1990 | 39 | 5 | 44 | 88.6% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 10 | 1 | 11 | 90.9% | 16 | 4 | 20 | 80.0% | 1997 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 43.5% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% |
| 1991 | 39 | 7 | 46 | 84.8% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 10 | 1 | 11 | 90.9% | 18 | 3 | 21 | 85.7% | 1998 | 10 | 14 | 24 | 41.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% |
| 1992 | 32 | 6 | 38 | 84.2% | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 16 | 9 | 25 | 64.0% | 1999 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 1993 | 24 | 9 | 33 | 72.7% | 16 | 4 | 20 | 80.0% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 11 | 7 | 18 | 61.1% | 2000 | 6 | 11 | 17 | 35.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 1994 | 31 | 9 | 40 | 77.5% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 11 | 7 | 18 | 61.1% | 2001 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 26 | 11 | 37 | 70.3% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2002 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 18 | 12 | 30 | 60.0% | 14 | 7 | 21 | 66.7% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 380 | 104 | 484 | 78.5% | 110 | 48 | 158 | 69.6% | 98 | 26 | 124 | 79.0% | 160 | 70 | 230 | 69.6% | Career | 74 | 107 | 181 | 40.9% | 6 | 28 | 34 | 17.6% | 22 | 24 | 46 | 47.8% | 51 | 49 | 100 | 51.0% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Stefan Edberg | Martin Damm Sr | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1982 | 1464 | 96.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 25.0% | -2.62 | 0–2 | 1–0 | — | +0.35 | 1989 | 1492 | 98.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | -0.08 |
| 1983 | 1617 | 133.1 | — | — | — | — | +5 | -20 | -83 | 52.8% | +0.21 | 2–2 (50%) | 3–4 (43%) | 101.5 | +0.10 | 1990 | 1478 | 98.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | +0.15 |
| 1984 | 1826 | 153.7 | — | — | — | — | -28 | -162 | -156 | 60.9% | +0.75 | 5–7 (42%) | 11–11 (50%) | 100.7 | -0.06 | 1991 | 1504 | 104.7 | — | — | — | — | +57 | — | — | 57.1% | +0.57 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.21 |
| 1985 | 2130 | 166.9 | — | — | — | — | -89 | -335 | -173 | 72.7% | +1.45 | 7–8 (47%) | 19–14 (58%) | 100.1 | -3.55 | 1992 | 1546 | 125.4 | — | — | — | — | +65 | -88 | — | 35.1% | -0.91 | 4–1 (80%) | 2–5 (29%) | 103.3 | +0.26 |
| 1986 | 2125 | 164.5 | — | — | — | — | +27 | -250 | -162 | 69.7% | +1.52 | 18–7 (72%) | 19–13 (59%) | 101.9 | -1.90 | 1993 | 1647 | 128.4 | — | — | — | — | +28 | -196 | — | 44.8% | -0.40 | 6–6 (50%) | 8–5 (62%) | 105.4 | +0.61 |
| 1987 | 2209 | 172.3 | — | — | — | — | +77 | -360 | -99 | 77.7% | +1.92 | 13–3 (81%) | 19–16 (54%) | 104.3 | -3.18 | 1994 | 1630 | 133.5 | — | — | — | — | -23 | -172 | +21 | 44.4% | -0.32 | 3–13 (19%) | 9–10 (47%) | 92.4 | -0.61 |
| 1988 | 2077 | 159.9 | — | — | — | — | +31 | -199 | +95 | 72.3% | +1.37 | 14–8 (64%) | 16–8 (67%) | 100.2 | -2.31 | 1995 | 1619 | 133.0 | — | — | — | — | +8 | — | — | 42.3% | -0.55 | 9–8 (53%) | 11–11 (50%) | 102.9 | -0.27 |
| 1989 | 2155 | 169.3 | — | — | — | — | +39 | -186 | +7 | 73.0% | +1.25 | 10–5 (67%) | 18–9 (67%) | 106.9 | -6.13 | 1996 | 1709 | 139.5 | — | — | — | — | +35 | — | -23 | 47.9% | -0.08 | 13–8 (62%) | 13–18 (42%) | 102.9 | +1.26 |
| 1990 | 2176 | 173.1 | — | — | — | — | +30 | -272 | +103 | 74.5% | +1.68 | 16–1 (94%) | 19–10 (66%) | 108.6 | -4.50 | 1997 | 1694 | 135.4 | — | — | — | — | +35 | -281 | +7 | 48.3% | -0.18 | 8–7 (53%) | 16–10 (62%) | 105.2 | +0.62 |
| 1991 | 2148 | 168.6 | +6.92 | +5.37 | 1.372 | 55.2% | +61 | -218 | +146 | 78.7% | +1.85 | 12–7 (63%) | 18–9 (67%) | 98.6 | -1.02 | 1998 | 1649 | 132.2 | — | — | — | — | +16 | — | +23 | 42.9% | -0.50 | 7–7 (50%) | 8–11 (42%) | 98.6 | -0.31 |
| 1992 | 2036 | 166.3 | +5.64 | +3.53 | 1.246 | 53.7% | +37 | -92 | +216 | 68.9% | +1.22 | 17–10 (63%) | 29–14 (67%) | 101.4 | +0.13 | 1999 | 1578 | 123.5 | — | — | — | — | +27 | -177 | +52 | 39.1% | -0.78 | 1–7 (13%) | 3–5 (38%) | 90.9 | -0.57 |
| 1993 | 1987 | 165.8 | +3.09 | +4.76 | 1.184 | 52.9% | +16 | +31 | +233 | 67.6% | +1.11 | 15–9 (63%) | 24–13 (65%) | 101.9 | -2.70 | 2000 | 1615 | 127.5 | — | — | — | — | -72 | -159 | +102 | 44.2% | -0.34 | 7–3 (70%) | 6–9 (40%) | 105.2 | +0.30 |
| 1994 | 1874 | 159.8 | +4.24 | +3.69 | 1.218 | 53.6% | +60 | +64 | +297 | 67.4% | +1.26 | 11–10 (52%) | 13–11 (54%) | 94.3 | +1.11 | 2001 | 1514 | 96.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +91 | 15.0% | -1.90 | — | 0–2 | — | +0.77 |
| 1995 | 1827 | 152.9 | +1.63 | +3.73 | 1.143 | 52.1% | +69 | +91 | +198 | 60.3% | +0.83 | 12–7 (63%) | 13–7 (65%) | 101.7 | +0.90 | 2002 | 1525 | 111.4 | — | — | — | — | +15 | — | — | 37.5% | -0.75 | — | 1–1 | — | -0.13 |
| 1996 | 1888 | 152.3 | +2.04 | +3.83 | 1.139 | 52.1% | -26 | +12 | +184 | 60.6% | +0.82 | 9–9 (50%) | 13–17 (43%) | 91.4 | -2.82 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 2237 | 168.9 | +4.15 | +4.19 | 1.222 | 53.4% | +27 | -108 | +46 | 69.9% | +1.32 | 161–95 (63%) | 235–156 (60%) | 102.1 | -2.58 | Career | 1732 | 136.6 | — | — | — | — | +17 | -170 | +36 | 43.3% | -0.43 | 59–60 (50%) | 77–88 (47%) | 101.6 | +0.62 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boris Becker | 10 | 22 | 32 | Jun 16, 1996 | H2H |
| Ivan Lendl | 14 | 13 | 27 | Sep 11, 1992 | H2H |
| Michael Chang | 12 | 9 | 21 | Aug 3, 1996 | H2H |
| Mats Wilander | 9 | 11 | 20 | Jul 27, 1995 | H2H |
| Brad Gilbert | 15 | 4 | 19 | Aug 26, 1993 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cedric Pioline | 2 | 7 | 9 | Jun 23, 1999 | — |
| Patrick Rafter | 1 | 7 | 8 | Jun 24, 2000 | — |
| Thomas Johansson | 3 | 4 | 7 | May 4, 2000 | — |
| Byron Black | 2 | 5 | 7 | Aug 18, 1999 | — |
| Goran Ivanisevic | 0 | 5 | 5 | Jan 16, 2002 | — |