H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Stefan Edberg vs Richard Krajicek H2H: 3-4

Richard Krajicek holds a 4–3 lead over Stefan Edberg in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Stefan Edberg leads 3–2 on hard courts, while Richard Krajicek leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Stefan Edberg won the 1996 US Open first round 6-3 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Stefan Edberg
SWE Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 4
7 main draw meetings
Richard Krajicek
NED Age 54 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 28, 1996* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Stefan Edberg #28 6-3 6-3 6-3 Richard Krajicek #8 Match data
May 19, 1996* Rome Masters Masters 1000 QF Clay Richard Krajicek #25 6-3 6-3 Stefan Edberg #54 Match data
Apr 25, 1996* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Richard Krajicek #25 0-6 6-4 6-2 Stefan Edberg #52 Match data
Aug 15, 1994 Indianapolis ATP 250 R16 Hard Stefan Edberg #4 6-1 5-7 6-4 Richard Krajicek #31 Match data
Sep 9, 1992* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Stefan Edberg #2 6-4 6-7(6) 6-3 3-6 6-4 Richard Krajicek #15 Match data
Apr 11, 1992* Tokyo Outdoor ATP 250 SF Hard Richard Krajicek #30 6-3 7-5 Stefan Edberg #1 Match data
Aug 16, 1991* New Haven ATP 250 R16 Hard Richard Krajicek #37 4-6 6-3 6-3 Stefan Edberg #2 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Stefan Edberg #1,347 #1 3,997 2,233 744 246 75.2% 6 5 1 0 29 41
Richard Krajicek #1,044 #4 3,130 2,044 408 207 66.3% 1 2 0 0 14 17

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Stefan Edberg Richard Krajicek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1982 0–3 0.0% — 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1983 12–10 54.5% #54 1,616 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1984 27–18 60.0% #20 1,823 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1985 58–17 77.3% #5 2,129 1 5 1991 26–20 56.5% #45 1,745 0 1
20 1986 66–20 76.7% #5 2,121 1 8 1992 47–24 66.2% #10 1,950 0 3
21 1987 75–12 86.2% #2 2,206 2 15 1993 36–20 64.3% #15 1,888 0 4
22 1988 54–15 78.3% #5 2,080 3 18 1994 32–13 71.1% #17 1,883 0 7
23 1989 58–16 78.4% #3 2,149 3 20 1995 40–20 66.7% #11 1,832 0 9
24 1990 67–13 83.8% #1 2,172 4 27 1996 46–24 65.7% #7 1,876 1 10
25 1991 73–14 83.9% #1 2,146 5 33 1997 50–19 72.5% #11 1,969 1 13
26 1992 64–19 77.1% #2 2,044 6 36 1998 45–16 73.8% #10 1,975 1 15
27 1993 58–22 72.5% #5 1,986 6 37 1999 42–20 67.7% #10 1,879 1 17
28 1994 53–23 69.7% #7 1,854 6 40 2000 26–15 63.4% #36 1,885 1 17
29 1995 35–19 64.8% #23 1,823 6 41 — — — — — — —
30 1996 44–25 63.8% #14 1,890 6 41 2002 7–6 53.8% #112 1,839 1 17
31 — — — — — — — 2003 11–10 52.4% #147 1,762 1 17