H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Stefan Edberg vs Thomas Hogstedt H2H: 1-1
Stefan Edberg and Thomas Hogstedt are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Stefan Edberg leads 1–0 on carpet, while Thomas Hogstedt leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Stefan Edberg won the 1991 Paris Masters third round 6-0 6-7(1) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 62
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 1991* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Stefan Edberg | 6-0 6-7(1) 6-3 | Thomas Hogstedt | Match data |
| Nov 3, 1982* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Thomas Hogstedt | 6-3 6-7 6-1 | Stefan Edberg | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stefan Edberg | #1,347 | #1 | 3,997 | 2,233 | 744 | 246 | 75.2% | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 29 | 41 |
| Thomas Hogstedt | #1,032 | #38 | 413 | 1,736 | 90 | 153 | 37.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Stefan Edberg | Thomas Hogstedt | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #368 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1982 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1983 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #54 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #549 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1984 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,823 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #82 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 58–17 | 77.3% | #5 | 2,129 | 1 | 5 | 1983 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #63 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1986 | 66–20 | 76.7% | #5 | 2,121 | 1 | 8 | 1984 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #84 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1987 | 75–12 | 86.2% | #2 | 2,206 | 2 | 15 | 1985 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #210 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1988 | 54–15 | 78.3% | #5 | 2,080 | 3 | 18 | 1986 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #124 | 1,504 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1989 | 58–16 | 78.4% | #3 | 2,149 | 3 | 20 | 1987 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #179 | 1,508 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1990 | 67–13 | 83.8% | #1 | 2,172 | 4 | 27 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #159 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1991 | 73–14 | 83.9% | #1 | 2,146 | 5 | 33 | 1989 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #133 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1992 | 64–19 | 77.1% | #2 | 2,044 | 6 | 36 | 1990 | 12–26 | 31.6% | #91 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1993 | 58–22 | 72.5% | #5 | 1,986 | 6 | 37 | 1991 | 11–23 | 32.4% | #130 | 1,518 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1994 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #7 | 1,854 | 6 | 40 | 1992 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #181 | 1,547 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1995 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #23 | 1,823 | 6 | 41 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #306 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1996 | 44–25 | 63.8% | #14 | 1,890 | 6 | 41 | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #309 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |