H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Stefan Koubek vs Bjorn Phau H2H: 2-1

Stefan Koubek holds a 2–1 lead over Bjorn Phau in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Stefan Koubek leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Stefan Koubek won the 2007 Mumbai round of 16 4-6 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Stefan Koubek
AUT Age 49 Left-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Bjorn Phau
GER Age 46 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Stefan Koubek #53 4-6 6-3 7-5 Bjorn Phau #153 Match data Sep 28, 2007* R16 Mumbai International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Bjorn Phau #96 6-7(7) 6-4 7-6(5) Stefan Koubek #105 Match data Oct 5, 2005* R64 Japan Open ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Stefan Koubek #63 7-5 6-4 Bjorn Phau #171 Match data May 1, 2003* R32 Munich Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Stefan Koubek #906 #20 1,143 1,796 195 235 45.3% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Bjorn Phau #1,098 #59 1,038 1,733 80 138 36.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Stefan Koubek Bjorn Phau
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1994 0–1 0.0% #1219 1,485 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — 1998 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
19 1996 1–2 33.3% #311 1,482 0 0 1999 3–2 60.0% #323 1,541 0 0
20 1997 4–2 66.7% #125 1,543 0 0 2000 0–4 0.0% #208 1,519 0 0
21 1998 2–4 33.3% #93 1,533 0 0 2001 2–4 33.3% #183 1,578 0 0
22 1999 29–25 53.7% #46 1,681 0 1 2002 1–6 14.3% #148 1,503 0 0
23 2000 26–27 49.1% #54 1,625 0 2 2003 1–4 20.0% #158 1,519 0 0
24 2001 20–22 47.6% #63 1,697 0 2 2004 5–4 55.6% #136 1,548 0 0
25 2002 18–31 36.7% #54 1,578 0 2 2005 10–14 41.7% #87 1,635 0 0
26 2003 19–24 44.2% #53 1,648 0 3 2006 16–26 38.1% #77 1,533 0 0
27 2004 22–24 47.8% #60 1,757 0 3 2007 4–10 28.6% #183 1,562 0 0
28 2005 6–15 28.6% #182 1,570 0 3 2008 3–4 42.9% #120 1,664 0 0
29 2006 14–9 60.9% #80 1,693 0 3 2009 12–17 41.4% #111 1,655 0 0
30 2007 22–26 45.8% #47 1,762 0 3 2010 9–13 40.9% #102 1,619 0 0
31 2008 3–6 33.3% #192 1,704 0 3 2011 2–7 22.2% #156 1,610 0 0
32 2009 6–11 35.3% #135 1,638 0 3 2012 7–14 33.3% #75 1,656 0 0
33 2010 3–5 37.5% #131 1,632 0 3 2013 2–6 25.0% #316 1,641 0 0
34 2011 0–1 0.0% #647 1,602 0 3 2014 3–2 60.0% #371 1,691 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Stefan Koubek Bjorn Phau
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1994 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1999 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1997 1 1 2 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1998 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2001 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1999 2 7 9 22.2% 25 13 38 65.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2002 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2000 18 14 32 56.3% 7 10 17 41.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2001 12 13 25 48.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2004 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2002 8 17 25 32.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2005 9 7 16 56.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2003 9 11 20 45.0% 6 9 15 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2006 10 15 25 40.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2004 8 10 18 44.4% 10 11 21 47.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 2007 4 9 13 30.8% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2005 3 7 10 30.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2008 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2006 6 4 10 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% 2009 8 9 17 47.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
30 2007 15 15 30 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2010 4 7 11 36.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2008 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2009 4 5 9 44.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2012 2 7 9 22.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
33 2010 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2013 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 92 116 208 44.2% 83 89 172 48.3% 8 19 27 29.6% 12 11 23 52.2% — 56 84 140 40.0% 22 37 59 37.3% 1 13 14 7.1% 1 4 5 20.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 390/430 of Stefan Koubek's and 218/218 of Bjorn Phau's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Stefan Koubek Bjorn Phau
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1994 1/1 0.0 1.0 76.1% 45.7% 18.2% 0.0% 28.6% 39.1% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 1/1 1.0 4.0 40.0% 65.0% 46.7% 50.0% 0.0% 54.0% 27.1%
19 1996 3/3 1.0 3.7 66.3% 48.8% 38.8% 48.3% 43.4% 45.6% 39.8% 1999 5/5 1.6 3.4 53.4% 54.5% 54.4% 45.3% 49.6% 54.6% 40.9%
20 1997 5/6 3.2 3.2 61.8% 61.8% 57.4% 46.6% 51.3% 60.1% 47.7% 2000 4/4 1.8 1.8 52.8% 62.8% 40.8% 51.8% 7.1% 52.3% 31.3%
21 1998 6/6 2.8 3.0 61.9% 64.4% 44.5% 49.8% 42.8% 56.9% 37.5% 2001 6/6 4.3 4.7 52.5% 63.3% 42.9% 53.9% 45.2% 52.9% 34.4%
22 1999 46/54 2.6 2.3 58.6% 66.4% 52.1% 56.8% 40.4% 60.8% 39.5% 2002 7/7 3.3 3.7 50.6% 64.1% 46.5% 57.5% 53.4% 55.5% 38.5%
23 2000 38/53 4.2 3.9 59.6% 67.7% 49.6% 52.4% 40.4% 60.2% 37.0% 2003 5/5 4.2 3.4 51.3% 66.4% 48.3% 40.4% 41.4% 57.3% 34.3%
24 2001 38/42 3.5 3.4 58.2% 66.1% 50.6% 58.1% 43.5% 59.4% 36.3% 2004 9/9 4.9 2.9 53.1% 76.7% 51.5% 55.8% 62.4% 64.6% 43.2%
25 2002 39/49 3.5 3.7 58.9% 65.2% 48.6% 48.7% 40.1% 58.3% 37.2% 2005 24/24 4.4 3.6 52.4% 68.8% 50.4% 55.0% 41.3% 60.2% 37.5%
26 2003 43/43 2.7 2.8 60.0% 65.0% 51.0% 58.8% 39.9% 59.5% 38.5% 2006 42/42 3.4 2.9 51.9% 68.0% 50.8% 54.4% 41.0% 59.6% 36.1%
27 2004 45/46 3.6 3.0 63.1% 65.9% 50.1% 55.2% 39.2% 60.1% 37.6% 2007 14/14 4.4 4.5 52.7% 66.7% 47.4% 56.2% 35.8% 57.5% 37.3%
28 2005 21/21 4.3 3.7 60.1% 63.6% 48.3% 56.0% 42.7% 57.4% 36.9% 2008 7/7 3.9 3.9 50.2% 70.9% 51.4% 56.7% 30.1% 61.5% 32.3%
29 2006 22/23 3.5 3.3 55.8% 68.2% 51.8% 58.7% 40.8% 60.7% 39.0% 2009 29/29 3.4 3.5 51.7% 69.1% 50.6% 51.6% 50.1% 60.2% 37.6%
30 2007 48/48 4.0 2.7 59.2% 67.9% 52.4% 56.6% 46.6% 61.4% 37.4% 2010 22/22 3.6 4.0 55.2% 69.2% 52.9% 65.0% 39.2% 62.1% 39.4%
31 2008 9/9 4.6 3.6 58.6% 65.0% 42.6% 46.4% 40.7% 55.7% 34.1% 2011 9/9 2.4 3.6 59.3% 63.5% 43.7% 41.9% 48.6% 55.1% 33.8%
32 2009 17/17 3.8 3.1 54.3% 70.4% 50.5% 42.5% 38.1% 60.9% 36.2% 2012 21/21 4.6 4.5 52.9% 66.9% 45.4% 55.4% 44.1% 56.9% 37.0%
33 2010 8/8 4.8 3.3 60.6% 61.5% 48.0% 42.1% 41.7% 56.6% 37.6% 2013 8/8 2.9 2.3 53.6% 65.2% 46.5% 35.9% 31.1% 57.5% 32.5%
34 2011 1/1 0.0 2.0 74.0% 51.4% 30.8% 16.7% 100.0% 46.0% 30.2% 2014 5/5 3.0 3.2 54.6% 69.7% 55.1% 58.5% 44.1% 63.0% 39.6%
Career — 390/430 3.5 3.1 59.5% 66.0% 50.2% 54.1% 41.6% 59.6% 37.7% — 218/218 3.7 3.5 52.8% 67.6% 49.4% 53.9% 42.5% 59.0% 36.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Stefan Koubek Bjorn Phau
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1994 1485 97.3 +0.16 -0.91 0.620 38.4% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1489 97.1 -0.67 +0.23 0.589 40.8% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.07
19 1996 1482 96.6 -2.52 -2.52 0.731 43.0% — +24 — 28.6% -1.86 1–0 — — +0.08 1999 1541 117.3 -2.26 +2.33 0.900 48.3% +18 — — 54.5% +0.09 1–0 — — -0.05
20 1997 1543 118.6 -0.10 +1.82 1.193 53.2% — +48 — 62.5% +1.00 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.15 2000 1520 113.1 -1.19 -2.11 0.655 41.9% — — — 10.0% -2.90 — — — -0.11
21 1998 1533 108.9 -0.90 -0.95 0.869 47.6% — +69 — 33.3% -0.80 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.21 2001 1579 109.7 -1.56 -0.62 0.730 44.0% +30 — — 41.2% -1.53 0–2 1–0 — -0.29
22 1999 1681 136.8 -0.61 +1.04 1.009 50.2% -157 +114 — 51.6% +0.05 5–5 (50%) 7–7 (50%) — -0.19 2002 1503 105.9 -2.35 -0.97 0.866 47.0% +44 +21 — 25.0% -1.31 0–2 1–2 (33%) — +0.28
23 2000 1625 128.0 -1.07 -0.50 0.930 48.8% +9 +46 -98 48.5% -0.25 9–8 (53%) 10–10 (50%) — +1.65 2003 1520 108.8 -1.25 -1.61 0.802 46.1% +50 — — 23.1% -1.23 1–1 3–4 (43%) — +0.04
24 2001 1698 130.5 -1.96 -0.75 0.896 48.3% -36 -2 — 45.3% -0.31 9–7 (56%) 9–4 (69%) — -0.37 2004 1549 112.6 +0.11 +2.06 1.218 53.5% +29 — — 54.5% +0.64 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — +0.81
25 2002 1578 131.6 -3.16 -0.15 0.892 47.7% -9 +101 -81 40.5% -0.74 5–8 (38%) 12–7 (63%) — -0.55 2005 1636 123.8 -2.04 +0.30 0.941 49.1% +33 -116 -171 45.2% -0.40 2–3 (40%) 5–7 (42%) — -0.35
26 2003 1648 134.0 -1.86 +1.04 0.952 49.2% -22 0 -152 46.3% -0.27 4–8 (33%) 9–2 (82%) — -1.35 2006 1534 119.1 -2.65 -1.24 0.895 47.8% +35 +14 -125 39.0% -0.89 4–6 (40%) 6–6 (50%) — +2.39
27 2004 1757 132.2 -2.49 +0.57 0.941 48.8% -16 -76 -256 45.5% -0.22 11–2 (85%) 9–7 (56%) — -1.10 2007 1562 125.0 -3.80 +0.33 0.876 47.5% +27 — — 35.1% -0.97 2–5 (29%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.14
28 2005 1570 110.6 -3.42 -1.33 0.865 47.6% +70 +14 — 35.8% -0.96 1–6 (14%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.80 2008 1664 123.3 +0.19 -0.03 0.839 47.4% -2 — — 38.9% -0.67 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.93
29 2006 1694 126.5 -1.41 +1.06 0.991 49.7% +45 -95 — 51.7% -0.05 9–2 (82%) 6–2 (75%) — +0.80 2009 1655 122.5 -2.48 +0.31 0.945 48.9% +37 -87 -225 39.1% -0.64 4–3 (57%) 3–3 (50%) — +1.24
30 2007 1763 141.7 -1.17 +0.49 0.969 49.6% +25 -117 — 47.8% -0.16 8–9 (47%) 9–7 (56%) — -0.82 2010 1620 123.4 -0.86 +1.49 1.040 50.9% +12 +26 — 39.6% -0.31 2–2 (50%) 2–7 (22%) — +1.70
31 2008 1704 118.9 -4.34 -0.28 0.769 45.0% +16 — — 42.3% -0.69 1–2 (33%) 4–2 (67%) — -0.40 2011 1610 120.1 -4.07 -0.27 0.753 44.3% -4 — — 28.6% -1.57 1–1 2–2 (50%) — -0.67
32 2009 1639 122.2 -1.09 -0.53 0.926 48.9% +44 -39 -164 41.3% -0.28 1–3 (25%) 1–6 (14%) — -0.24 2012 1656 129.8 -3.82 +0.05 0.858 46.9% -5 -6 -210 36.4% -1.29 1–5 (17%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.64
33 2010 1633 125.7 -2.71 +0.54 0.867 46.8% +123 — — 47.6% +0.09 1–1 2–3 (40%) — +0.03 2013 1642 127.4 -2.35 -2.12 0.765 44.5% +25 — — 26.3% -1.74 1–1 1–1 — -0.28
34 2011 1603 113.9 -0.31 -0.24 0.560 38.7% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.19 2014 1691 122.4 -0.28 +0.27 1.071 51.0% +37 — — 54.5% +0.46 1–0 — — +0.15
Career — 1796 135.7 -1.82 +0.18 0.932 48.8% -3 +19 -140 45.7% -0.31 69–64 (52%) 84–63 (57%) 111.6 -0.32 — 1734 127.9 -2.24 -0.06 0.902 48.0% +26 -14 -183 38.2% -0.83 24–34 (41%) 31–41 (43%) 95.8 +1.61

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.