H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Stefan Koubek vs Edouard Roger-Vasselin H2H: 1-0
Stefan Koubek holds a 1–0 lead over Edouard Roger-Vasselin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Stefan Koubek leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Stefan Koubek won the 2009 Wimbledon first round 7-5 6-3 4-6 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 49
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 42
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2009* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Stefan Koubek | 7-5 6-3 4-6 3-6 6-3 | Edouard Roger-Vasselin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stefan Koubek | #906 | #20 | 1,143 | 1,794 | 195 | 235 | 45.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Edouard Roger-Vasselin | #806 | #35 | 1,133 | 1,885 | 84 | 125 | 40.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Stefan Koubek | Edouard Roger-Vasselin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1219 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #311 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #125 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1999 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #46 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2000 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #54 | 1,627 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #97 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #63 | 1,698 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #166 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 18–31 | 36.7% | #54 | 1,578 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #153 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #53 | 1,647 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #124 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #60 | 1,754 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #182 | 1,568 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #102 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2006 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #80 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,817 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2007 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #47 | 1,760 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #87 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2008 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #192 | 1,703 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #123 | 1,758 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2009 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #135 | 1,636 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #293 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2010 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #131 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #647 | 1,602 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |